scholarly journals Predictors of Postdeployment Prescription Opioid Receipt and Long-term Prescription Opioid Utilization Among Army Active Duty Soldiers: Corrigendum

2018 ◽  
Vol 184 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 58-58
2018 ◽  
Vol 184 (1-2) ◽  
pp. e101-e109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Sayko Adams ◽  
Cindy Parks Thomas ◽  
Grant A Ritter ◽  
Sue Lee ◽  
Mayada Saadoun ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (01) ◽  
pp. 50-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly G. Kilcoyne ◽  
Jonathan F. Dickens ◽  
John-Paul Rue

2020 ◽  
Vol 1;24 (1;1) ◽  
pp. 31-40

BACKGROUND: Long-term opioid therapy was prescribed with increasing frequency over the past decade. However, factors surrounding long-term use of opioids in older adults remains poorly understood, probably because older people are not at the center stage of the national opioid crisis. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the annual utilization and trends in long-term opioid use among older adults in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Data from Medicare-enrolled older adults. METHODS: This study utilized a nationally representative sample of Medicare administrative claims data from the years 2012 to 2016 containing records of health care services for more than 2.3 million Medicare beneficiaries each year. Medicare beneficiaries who were 65 years of age or older and who were enrolled in Medicare Parts A, B, and D, but not Part C, for at least 10 months in a year were included in the study. We measured annual utilization and trends in new long-term opioid use episodes over 4 years (2013–2016). We examined claims records for the demographic characteristics of the eligible individuals and for the presence of chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP), cancer, and other comorbidities. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2016, administrative claims of approximately 2.3 million elderly Medicare beneficiaries were analyzed in each year with a majority of them being women (~56%) and white (~82%) with a mean age of approximately 75 years. The proportion of all eligible beneficiaries with at least one new opioid prescription increased from 6.64% in 2013, peaked at 10.32% in 2015, and then decreased to 8.14% in 2016. The proportion of individuals with long-term opioid use among those with a new opioid prescription was 12.40% in 2013 and 10.20% in 2016. Among new long-term opioid users, the proportion of beneficiaries with a cancer diagnosis during the study years increased from 13.30% in 2013 to 15.67% in 2016, and the proportion with CNCP decreased from 30.25% in 2013 to 27.36% in 2016. Across all years, long-term opioid use was consistently high in the Southern states followed by the Midwest region. LIMITATIONS: This study used Medicare fee-for-service administrative claims data to capture prescription fill patterns, which do not allow for the capture of individuals enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans, cash prescriptions, or for the evaluation of appropriateness of prescribing, or the actual use of medication. This study only examined long-term use episodes among patients who were defined as opioid-naive. Finally, estimates captured for 2016 could only utilize data from 9 months of the year to capture 90-day long-term-use episodes. CONCLUSIONS: Using a national sample of elderly Medicare beneficiaries, we observed that from 2013 to 2016 the use of new prescription opioids increased from 2013 to 2014 and peaked in 2015. The use of new long-term prescription opioids peaked in 2014 and started to decrease from 2015 and 2016. Future research needs to evaluate the impact of the changes in new and long-term prescription opioid use on population health outcomes. KEY WORDS: Long-term, opioids, older adults, trends, Medicare, chronic non-cancer pain, cancer, cohort study


1985 ◽  
Vol 150 (8) ◽  
pp. 447-450
Author(s):  
Manuel J. Martinez ◽  
John C. Hill ◽  
John S. Clarke
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 150 ◽  
pp. 112-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger D. Weiss ◽  
Jennifer Sharpe Potter ◽  
Margaret L. Griffin ◽  
Scott E. Provost ◽  
Garrett M. Fitzmaurice ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tolulope Odedokun ◽  
Larissa F Weir ◽  
James K Aden

Abstract Introduction Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) affects approximately 1-14% of all pregnancies in the United States and has significant maternal and neonatal consequences. Developing GDM can increase a patient’s risk of developing overt diabetes in the future which may impact a soldier’s readiness. The purpose of this study is to compare the incidence of GDM in active duty females compared with civilian dependents. Materials and Methods This retrospective cohort analysis was performed at a military medical center with IRB approval. Active duty and dependent status women who delivered between June 1, 2014 and April 30, 2015 were identified along with incidence of GDM. Sample size calculation determined a need for 391 women in each group to observe a 5% difference in rate of GDM with a power of 80%. Chi-squared analysis was used to compare rates of GDM. Results Rates of GDM were similar between the two cohorts (active duty = 9.95%, dependent = 9.72%, P = .91). Age, gravidity, and prepregnancy BMI were also similar between groups. The rate of diet-controlled GDM were different between the two cohorts (active duty = 53.8%, dependent = 34.2%, P = .02). Conclusions This study highlights active duty females have similar rates of GDM as dependents. Gestational diabetes mellitus is known to affect short- and long-term maternal and neonatal outcomes and can impact a soldier’s readiness. Further research is required to determine the long-term impact of GDM in active duty females and best practices to decrease rates of GDM in the military population.


2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven K. Dobscha ◽  
Benjamin J. Morasco ◽  
Jonathan P. Duckart ◽  
Tara Macey ◽  
Richard A. Deyo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document