scholarly journals Selection of primer-template sequences that bind human immunodeficiency virus reverse transcriptase with high affinity

2006 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 130-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. DeStefano
2006 ◽  
Vol 50 (7) ◽  
pp. 2553-2556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Wirden ◽  
Bénédicte Roquebert ◽  
Anne Derache ◽  
Anne Simon ◽  
Claudine Duvivier ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT We analyzed 3,475 human immunodeficiency virus sequences and 241 therapeutic histories. The L74I mutation was carried by 7% of viruses. L74I was strongly associated with T215F, K70R, and V75M/S/T/A mutations and increased with the number of thymidine analog mutations. It seemed to be linked to the use of abacavir or efavirenz.


Biochemistry ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 34 (29) ◽  
pp. 9599-9610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Schneider ◽  
Juli Feigon ◽  
Zdenek Hostomsky ◽  
Larry Gold

1995 ◽  
Vol 233 (3) ◽  
pp. 856-863 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ol'ga D. Zakharova ◽  
Laura Tarrago-Litvak ◽  
Galija Maksakova ◽  
Marie-Line Andreola ◽  
Emmanuelle Dufour ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 731-738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Maguire ◽  
Denise Shortino ◽  
Astrid Klein ◽  
Wendy Harris ◽  
Varsha Manohitharajah ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Previous data have indicated that the development of resistance to amprenavir, an inhibitor of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease, is associated with the substitution of valine for isoleucine at residue 50 (I50V) in the viral protease. We present further findings from retrospective genotypic and phenotypic analyses of plasma samples from protease inhibitor-naïve and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-experienced patients who experienced virological failure while participating in a clinical trial where they had been randomized to receive either amprenavir or indinavir in combination with NRTIs. Paired baseline and on-therapy isolates from 31 of 48 (65%) amprenavir-treated patients analyzed demonstrated the selection of protease mutations. These mutations fell into four distinct categories, characterized by the presence of either I50V, I54L/I54M, I84V, or V32I+I47V and often included accessory mutations, commonly M46I/L. The I50V and I84V genotypes displayed the greatest reductions in susceptibility to amprenavir, although each of the amprenavir-selected genotypes conferred little or no cross-resistance to other protease inhibitors. There was a significant association, for both amprenavir and indinavir, between preexisting baseline resistance to NRTIs subsequently received during the study and development of protease mutations (P = 0.014 and P = 0.031, respectively). Our data provide a comprehensive analysis of the mechanisms by which amprenavir resistance develops during clinical use and present evidence that resistance to concomitant agents in the treatment regimen predisposes to the development of mutations associated with protease inhibitor resistance and treatment failure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document