scholarly journals A ‘Semi-Protected Oligonucleotide Recombination’ Assay for DNA Mismatch Repairin vivoSuggests Different Modes of Repair for Lagging Strand Mismatches

2017 ◽  
pp. gkw1339
Author(s):  
Eric A. Josephs ◽  
Piotr E. Marszalek
Keyword(s):  
Dna Mismatch ◽  
Lagging Strand ◽  
Recombination Assay

scholarly journals Determinants of base-pair substitution patterns revealed by whole-genome sequencing of DNA mismatch repair defectiveEscherichia coli

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia L. Foster ◽  
Brittany A. Niccum ◽  
Ellen Popodi ◽  
Jesse P. Townes ◽  
Heewook Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Whole Genome Sequencing ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Genome Sequencing ◽  
Base Pair ◽  
Whole Genome ◽  
Dna Mismatch ◽  
In The Wild ◽  
Leading Strand ◽  
Base Pair Substitution ◽  
Lagging Strand

ABSTRACTMismatch repair (MMR) is a major contributor to replication fidelity, but its impact varies with sequence context and the nature of the mismatch. Mutation accumulation experiments followed by whole-genome sequencing of MMR-defectiveE. colistrains yielded ≈30,000 base-pair substitutions, revealing mutational patterns across the entire chromosome. The base-pair substitution spectrum was dominated by A:T > G:C transitions, which occurred predominantly at the center base of 5′NAC3′+5′GTN3′ triplets. Surprisingly, growth on minimal medium or at low temperature attenuated these mutations. Mononucleotide runs were also hotspots for base-pair substitutions, and the rate at which these occurred increased with run length. Comparison with ≈2000 base-pair substitutions accumulated in MMR-proficient strains revealed that both kinds of hotspots appeared in the wild-type spectrum and so are likely to be sites of frequent replication errors. In MMR-defective strains transitions were strand biased, occurring twice as often when A and C rather than T and G were on the lagging-strand template. Loss of nucleotide diphosphate kinase increases the cellular concentration of dCTP, which resulted in increased rates of mutations due to misinsertion of C opposite A and T. In anmmr ndkdouble mutant strain, these mutations were more frequent when the template A and T were on the leading strand, suggesting that lagging-strand synthesis was more error-prone or less well corrected by proofreading than was leading strand synthesis.

scholarly journals Novel PMS1 Alleles Preferentially Affect the Repair of Primer Strand Loops during DNA Replication

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (21) ◽  
pp. 9221-9231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naz Erdeniz ◽  
Sandra Dudley ◽  
Regan Gealy ◽  
Sue Jinks-Robertson ◽  
R. Michael Liskay
Keyword(s):  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Current View ◽  
Dna Mismatch ◽  
Template Strand ◽  
Repeat Sequences ◽  
Mutation Avoidance ◽  
Mismatch Recognition ◽  
Lagging Strand ◽  
Simple Sequence ◽  
Polymerase Slippage

ABSTRACT Null mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes elevate both base substitutions and insertions/deletions in simple sequence repeats. Data suggest that during replication of simple repeat sequences, polymerase slippage can generate single-strand loops on either the primer or template strand that are subsequently processed by the MMR machinery to prevent insertions and deletions, respectively. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and mammalian cells, MMR appears to be more efficient at repairing mispairs comprised of loops on the template strand compared to loops on the primer strand. We identified two novel yeast pms1 alleles, pms1-G882E and pms1-H888R, which confer a strong defect in the repair of “primer strand” loops, while maintaining efficient repair of “template strand” loops. Furthermore, these alleles appear to affect equally the repair of 1-nucleotide primer strand loops during both leading- and lagging-strand replication. Interestingly, both pms1 mutants are proficient in the repair of 1-nucleotide loop mispairs in heteroduplex DNA generated during meiotic recombination. Our results suggest that the inherent inefficiency of primer strand loop repair is not simply a mismatch recognition problem but also involves Pms1 and other proteins that are presumed to function downstream of mismatch recognition, such as Mlh1. In addition, the findings reinforce the current view that during mutation avoidance, MMR is associated with the replication apparatus.

TUMOUR PATHOLOGY PREDICTS MICROSATELLITE INSTABILITY IN A POPULATION-BASED SERIES OF COLORECTAL CANCER CASES

2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 12
Author(s):  
A J Hyde ◽  
D Fontaine ◽  
R C Green ◽  
M Simms ◽  
P S Parfrey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Lynch Syndrome ◽  
Microsatellite Instability ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Pathological Features ◽  
Predictive Tool ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Dna Mismatch ◽  
Bethesda Guidelines ◽  
Revised Bethesda Guidelines

Background: Lynch Syndrome is an autosomal dominant trait that accounts forapproximately 3% of all cases of colorectal cancer (CRC). It is caused by mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes, most commonly MLH1 or MSH2. These MMR defects cause high levels of microsatellite instability (MSI-H) in the tumours. MSI testing of all CRCs to identify potential Lynch Syndrome cases is not practical, so the Bethesda Guidelines, which use clinical and pathological features, were created to identify those tumours most likely to be MSI-H^1. In 2007 Jenkins et. al. created MsPath, a tool based on the pathological features described in the rarely used 3^rd Bethesda criterion, to improve prediction of MSI-H tumours among CRC cases diagnosed before age 60 years^2. Methods: We collected a population-based cohort of 716 CRC cases diagnosed before age 75 years in Newfoundland. For each of these cases we collected family history, performed MSI analysis, and scored a number of pathological features for the purpose of evaluating the accuracy of the Bethesda Criteria and MsPath at predicting MSI-H tumours. Results: Our work validates the MsPath tool in the Newfoundland population for the same age group used to create the tool. We found it identified MSI-H cases with a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of 35% in our population of CRCcases diagnosed before age 60 years (n=290). We also tested this tool on our older population of CRCcases, diagnosed at ages 60 to 74 years (n=426). We found it to be at least as predictive in this population,with a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 42%. We then used our entire cohort (N=716) to compare MsPath with the other Bethesda criteria.Bethesda criteria 1, 2, 4 and 5 together predicted MSI-H cases with a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 51%. MsPath was better at identifying these cases, with a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 39%. Conclusions: We conclude that MsPath can be extended to include patients diagnosed with CRC before age 75 years. As well, we have found that MsPath is a better predictive tool than the Revised Bethesda Guidelines for identifying MSI-H cases within a population-based setting of colorectal cancer. References: 1. Umar, A. et. al. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:261-8 2.Jenkins, M.A. et. al. Gastroenterology 2007;133:48-56

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document