SP569PROGNOSTIC IMPORTANCE OF GLYCATED MARKERS ON CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY IN HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS WITH DIABETES MELLITUS -5 YEARS FOLLOW UP

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background-Whether Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) confers a survival benefit in patients with diabetes mellitus(DM) and complex coronary artery disease (CAD), including left main CAD and multivessel coronary disease (MVD) after a follow up period ≥ 5 years remains unknown. Methods- Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane) were searched from inception to December 12th 2020. Using a generic invariance weighted random effects model, Hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from individual studies were converted to Log HRs and corresponding standard errors, which were then pooled. The primary outcome of interest was all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) which was defined as a composite of death, myocardial reinfarction and stroke at ≥ 5 years. Results-A total of 8 studies with 13336 participants(PCI = 6783, CABG = 6553)were included in our analysis. Mean age was 54.6 and 55.3 in the PCI-DES and CABG groups respectively. The 5-yr follow-up outcomes including all-cause mortality (HR 1.37; 95%CI 1.15-1.65; p = 0.0006, I2 = 0)and MACCE (HR 1.48; 95%CI 1.29-1.69; p < 0.00001, I2 = 0) were significantly higher with PCI as compared to CABG. Furthermore, at >5 year follow-up, all-cause mortality (HR 1.35; 95%CI 1.10-1.66; p = 0.004, I2 = 37) and MACCE (HR 1.98; 95%CI 1.85-2.12; p < 0.00001, I2 = 0) had similar outcomes. Conclusion-Amongst patients with DM and Complex CAD ( left main/MVD), CABG was associated with improved long-term mortality and freedom from MACCEs as opposed to PCI-DES. CABG is the preferred revascularization strategy in patients with complex anatomic disease and concurrent diabetes. Abstract Figure.

Download Full-text

P1493CORRELATION BETWEEN END-DIALYSIS OVER-WEIGHT IN INITIAL STAGE OF HEMODIALYSIS AND PROGNOSIS IN INCIDENT HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation ◽

10.1093/ndt/gfaa142.p1493 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽

Author(s):

Ping Zhang ◽

Ying Wang ◽

Xi Yao ◽

Shaohua Chen ◽

Chunping Xu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Factor ◽

Cardiovascular Mortality ◽

Multivariate Regression ◽

Independent Risk Factor ◽

Hemodialysis Patients ◽

Maintenance Hemodialysis ◽

Interdialytic Weight Gain ◽

The Relationship

Abstract Background and Aims The volume factor of maintenance hemodialysis patients is closely related to the prognosis. We hypothesized that the excess weight after dialysis (end-dialysis over-weight, edOW) is an important factor of volume impact survival in hemodialysis (HD) patients. The purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship between edOW and long-term prognosis of patients with maintenance hemodialysis. Method This retrospective study observed incident hemodialysis patients who treated in Kidney Disease Center, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University from January 1, 2008 to April 30, 2017, three times a week for at least one year. The end point of follow-up was death, abdominal dialysis, kidney transplantation, transfer or until April 30, 2018. The general data of the patients included age, gender, BMI, primary renal disease, CVD, first hemodialysis access, albumin(Alb), Haemoglobin(Hb), blood pressure, heart rate, ultrafiltration rate(UFR), interdialytic weight gain IDWG, end -dialysis overweight (edOW). Cox multivariate regression was used to analyze the relationship between edow and all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. Results Totally 469 patients male, 64% were enrolled, with an average age of 56.9 ± 17.1 years. During the follow-up period, 102 patients died. The main cause of death was cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, accounting for 44.7%. The mean value of edow was 0.28 ± 0.02 kg. Kaplan-Meier(Log-rank test) survival analysis showed that the long-term survival rate of the group with edow ≤ 0.28kg was better than that of the group with edow > 0.28kg (P = 0.042), and the cardiovascular mortality of the group with edow > 0.28kg was significantly higher than that of the group with edow ≤ 0.28kg (P = 0.001). Cox multivariate regression analysis showed that edow was an independent risk factor for all-cause death in hemodialysis patients (P = 0.025, AhR = 1.541, 95% CI 1.057-2.249), and also an independent risk factor for CVD death in hemodialysis patients (P = 0.007, AhR = 1.929, 95% CI 1.198-3.107). Conclusion EdOW is an independent risk factor of long-term all-cause and cardiovascular death in hemodialysis patients.

Download Full-text