SURG-01. RISK OF TRACT RECURRENCE WITH STEREOTACTIC BIOPSY OF BRAIN METASTASES: AN 18-YEAR CANCER CENTER EXPERIENCE

Abstract BACKGROUND Stereotactic biopsy is increasingly performed on brain metastases (BrM) as improving cancer outcomes drive aggressive multimodality treatment, however the risk of tract recurrence for such biopsies, in both the upfront and recurrent settings, are poorly defined in an era defined by focused-irradiation paradigms. As such, the rate of tract recurrence was evaluated. METHODS A retrospective review was performed to identify stereotactic biopsies performed for BrM at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from 2002-2020. Data including surgical indications, tumor type, radiographic characteristics, stereotactic planning, pre- and post-operative CNS-directed and systemic treatments, and clinical courses were collected. Recurrence was evaluated using RANO-BM criteria. RESULTS Four-hundred-and-seventy-nine patients underwent stereotactic intracranial biopsy for any diagnosis (>80% were for gliomas or CNS lymphoma). Twenty-two (4.5%) were for pathologically-confirmed viable BrM and 91% of these underwent postoperative irradiation with either stereotactic radiotherapy (14/20, 70%; SBRT) in plans that did not specifically target the biopsy tract, or whole-brain irradiation (6/20, 30%; WBRT). Eleven patients (50%) had >/=3 months radiographic follow-up (median 11.9; 4.5-30.6), of which 6 (55%) developed discontinuous enhancement along the tract at a median 6.4 months (2.3-17.1) post-biopsy. Of these, 2 had previously been treated with SBRT and were sampled in the setting of diagnostic ambiguity (one additionally with WBRT for small cell carcinoma) and underwent intraoperative laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) immediately following biopsy. The remainder were treated with SBRT +/- LITT (n=3 and 4, respectively) following biopsy. Tract recurrences were treated with resection (n=2, both with pathologic confirmation), re-irradiation (n=1) or observation/systemic therapy. CONCLUSIONS In this largest reported series of biopsied BrM, we identify a nontrivial rate, higher than previously described, of recurrence along stereotactic biopsy tracts. As BrM are most commonly treated with focused radiotherapy centered on enhancing tumor margins, consideration should be made to include biopsy tracts where feasible.

Download Full-text

50. RISK OF TRACT RECURRENCE WITH STEREOTACTIC BIOPSY OF BRAIN METASTASES: AN 18-YEAR CANCER CENTER EXPERIENCE

Neuro-Oncology Advances ◽

10.1093/noajnl/vdaa073.038 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 2 (Supplement_2) ◽

pp. ii10-ii10

Author(s):

Joseph Carnevale ◽

Graham Winston ◽

Jacob Goldberg ◽

Cameron Brennan ◽

Viviane Tabar ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Brain Metastases ◽

Stereotactic Biopsy ◽

Multimodality Treatment ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Cns Lymphoma ◽

Tumor Type ◽

Whole Brain Irradiation ◽

Brain Irradiation ◽

Systemic Treatments ◽

Postoperative Irradiation

Abstract BACKGROUND Stereotactic biopsy is increasingly performed on brain metastases (BrM) as improving cancer outcomes drive aggressive multimodality treatment, however the risk of tract recurrence for such biopsies, in both the upfront and recurrent settings, are poorly defined in an era defined by focused-irradiation paradigms. As such, the rate of tract recurrence was evaluated. METHODS A retrospective review was performed to identify stereotactic biopsies performed for BrM at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from 2002–2020. Data including surgical indications, tumor type, radiographic characteristics, stereotactic planning, pre- and post-operative CNS-directed and systemic treatments, and clinical courses were collected. Recurrence was evaluated using RANO-BM criteria. RESULTS Four-hundred-and-seventy-nine patients underwent stereotactic intracranial biopsy for any diagnosis (>80% were gliomas or CNS lymphoma). Twenty-two (4.5%) were for pathologically-confirmed viable BrM and 91% (20/22) of these underwent postoperative irradiation with either stereotactic radiotherapy (14/20, 70%; SBRT) in plans that did not specifically target the biopsy tract, or whole-brain irradiation (6/20, 30%; WBRT). Eleven patients (50%) had >/=3 months radiographic follow-up (median 11.9; 4.5–30.6), of which 6 (55%) developed discontinuous enhancement along the tract at a median 6.4 months (2.3–17.1) post-biopsy. Of these, 2 had previously been treated with SBRT and were sampled in the setting of diagnostic ambiguity (one additionally with WBRT for small cell carcinoma) and underwent intraoperative laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) immediately following biopsy. The remainder were treated with SBRT +/- LITT (n=3 and 4, respectively) following biopsy. Tract recurrences were treated with resection (n=2, both with pathologic confirmation), re-irradiation (n=1) or observation/systemic therapy. CONCLUSIONS In this largest reported series of biopsied BrM, we identify a nontrivial rate, higher than previously described, of recurrence along stereotactic biopsy tracts. As BrM are most commonly treated with focused radiotherapy centered on enhancing tumor margins, consideration should be made to include biopsy tracts where feasible.

Download Full-text

Risk of tract recurrence with stereotactic biopsy of brain metastases: an 18-year cancer center experience

Journal of Neurosurgery ◽

10.3171/2021.3.jns204347 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-7

Author(s):

Joseph A. Carnevale ◽

Brandon S. Imber ◽

Graham M. Winston ◽

Jacob L. Goldberg ◽

Ase Ballangrud ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Brain Metastases ◽

Stereotactic Biopsy ◽

Multimodality Treatment ◽

Response Assessment ◽

Cancer Center ◽

Adjuvant Radiation ◽

Time Period ◽

Additional Surgery ◽

Systemic Treatments ◽

Initial Biopsy

OBJECTIVE Stereotactic biopsy is increasingly performed on brain metastases (BrMs) as improving cancer outcomes drive aggressive multimodality treatment, including laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT). However, the tract recurrence (TR) risk is poorly defined in an era defined by focused-irradiation paradigms. As such, the authors aimed to define indications and adjuvant therapies for this procedure and evaluate the BrM-biopsy TR rate. METHODS In a single-center retrospective review, the authors identified stereotactic BrM biopsies performed from 2002 to 2020. Surgical indications, radiographic characteristics, stereotactic planning, dosimetry, pre- and postoperative CNS-directed and systemic treatments, and clinical courses were collected. Recurrence was evaluated using RANO-BM (Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases) criteria. RESULTS In total, 499 patients underwent stereotactic intracranial biopsy for any diagnosis, of whom 25 patients (5.0%) underwent biopsy for pathologically confirmed viable BrM, a proportion that increased over the time period studied. Twelve of the 25 BrM patients had ≥ 3 months of radiographic follow-up, of whom 6 patients (50%) developed new metastatic growth along the tract at a median of 5.0 months post-biopsy (range 2.3–17.1 months). All of the TR cases had undergone pre- or early post-biopsy stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and 3 had also undergone LITT at the time of initial biopsy. TRs were treated with resection, reirradiation, or observation/systemic therapy. CONCLUSIONS In this study the authors identified a nontrivial, higher than previously described rate of BrM-biopsy tract recurrence, which often required additional surgery or radiation and justified close radiographic surveillance. As BrMs are commonly treated with SRS limited to enhancing tumor margins, consideration should be made, in cases lacking CNS-active systemic treatments, to include biopsy tracts in adjuvant radiation plans where feasible.

Download Full-text