INNV-01. THE CASE OF LEPTOMENINGEAL CARCINOMATOSIS RELATED HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGED WITH SYSTEMIC AND INTRATHECAL CHEMOTHERAPY

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi105-vi105
Author(s):  
Maya Hrachova ◽  
Maciej Mrugala

Abstract INTRODUCTION Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) is an end-stage sequela of metastatic cancer that commonly leads to severe neurological symptoms due to hydrocephalus and commonly treated with surgery or radiation. As these procedures are invasive and have associated risks, chemotherapy could be a great alternative. We report a case of a hydrocephalus related to LC in a patient with Stage IV breast cancer that resolved after the administration of HD-MTX and intrathecal cytarabine. CASE A 64-year-old right-handed woman with Stage IV ER positive, PR positive, HER2 negative invasive lobular carcinoma of the left breast on chemotherapy with palbociclib and alpelisib who presented with mild occipital headaches, diplopia and imbalance. Imaging revealed an extensive abnormal leptomeningeal enhancement withing the posterior fossa compatible with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. CSF cytology was consistent with metastatic adenocarcinoma. Liquid biopsy detected circulating tumor cells. During the admission for the cycle 1 of systemic chemotherapy with HD-MTX and intrathecal cytarabine, neurological status deteriorated as she became stuporous due to the newly developed moderate obstructive and communicating hydrocephalus. Surgical innervation was considered but given her response to serial Ommaya taps and dexamethasone, we proceeded with observation. Symptomatic improvement was noted within few days and confirmed on imaging showing the resolution of previously seen hydrocephalus. DISCUSSION This case highlights the role of non-invasive combination of systemic and intrathecal chemotherapy in patients with LC-related hydrocephalus aimed to preserve patient’s quality of life. No relevant disclosures.

2011 ◽  
Vol 44 (10) ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
DR. SEEMA KHAN ◽  
DR. BLAKE CADY

Author(s):  
Yoanna S. Pumpalova ◽  
Oluwatosin A. Ayeni ◽  
Wenlong Carl Chen ◽  
Daniel S. O’Neil ◽  
Sarah Nietz ◽  
...  

Cancer ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 444-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Manni ◽  
Jaime E. Trujillo ◽  
James S. Marshall ◽  
Jerald Brodkey ◽  
Olof H. Pearson

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen-Yu He ◽  
Chen-Lu Lian ◽  
Jun Wang ◽  
Jian Lei ◽  
Li Hua ◽  
...  

Abstract This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of biological factors, including histological grade, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) status in de novo stage IV breast cancer. Based on eligibility, patient data deposited between 2010 and 2014 were collected from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database. The receiver operating characteristics curve, Kaplan–Meier analysis, and Cox proportional hazard analysis were used for analysis. We included 8725 patients with a median 3-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) of 52.6%. Higher histologic grade, HER2-negative, ER-negative, and PR-negative disease were significantly associated with lower BCSS in the multivariate prognostic analysis. A risk score staging system separated patients into four risk groups. The risk score was assigned according to a point system: 1 point for grade 3, 1 point if hormone receptor-negative, and 1 point if HER2-negative. The 3-year BCSS was 76.3%, 64.5%, 48.5%, and 23.7% in patients with 0, 1, 2, and 3 points, respectively, with a median BCSS of 72, 52, 35, and 16 months, respectively (P < 0.001). The multivariate prognostic analysis showed that the risk score staging system was an independent prognostic factor associated with BCSS. Patients with a higher risk score had a lower BCSS. Sensitivity analyses replicated similar findings after stratification according to tumor stage, nodal stage, the sites of distant metastasis, and the number of distant metastasis. In conclusion, our risk score staging system shows promise for the prognostic stratification of de novo stage IV breast cancer.


2003 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.R Carmichael ◽  
E.D.C Anderson ◽  
U Chetty ◽  
J.M Dixon

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document