RBIO-03. INITIAL RESULT OF DEVELOP ROBUST DEEP LEARNING MODEL FOR DETECTING GENOMIC STATUS IN GLIOMAS AGAINST IMAGE DIFFERENCES AMONG FACILITIES

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi192-vi192
Author(s):  
Satoshi Takahashi ◽  
Masamichi Takahashi ◽  
Manabu Kinoshita ◽  
Mototaka Miyake ◽  
Jun Sese ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND The importance of detecting the genomic status of gliomas is increasingly recognized and IDH (isocitrate dehydrogenase) mutation and TERT (telomerase reverse transcriptase) promoter mutation have a significant impact on treatment decisions. Noninvasive prediction of these genomic statuses in gliomas is a challenging problem; however, a deep learning model using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be a solution. The image differences among facilities causing performance degradation, called domain shift, have also been reported in other tasks such as brain tumor segmentation. We investigated whether a deep learning model could predict the gene status, and if so, to what extent it would be affected by domain shift. METHOD We used the Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation Challenge (BraTS) data and the Japanese cohort (JC) dataset consisted of brain tumor images collected from 544 patients in 10 facilities in Japan. We focused on IDH mutation and TERT promoter mutation. The deep learning models to predict the statuses of these genes were trained by the BraTS dataset or the training portion of the JC dataset, and the test portion of the JC dataset evaluated the accuracy of the models. RESULTS The IDH mutation predicting model trained by the BraTS dataset showed 80.0% accuracy for the validation portion of the BraTS dataset; however, only 67.3% for the test portion of the JC dataset. The TERT promoter mutation predicting model trained by the training portion of the JC dataset showed only 49% accuracy for the test portion of the JC dataset. CONCLUSION IDH mutation can be predicted by deep learning models using MRI, but the performance degeneration by domain shift was significant. On the other hand, TERT promoter mutation could not be predicted accurately enough by current deep learning techniques. In both mutations, further studies are needed.

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
pp. 98-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaomei Zhao ◽  
Yihong Wu ◽  
Guidong Song ◽  
Zhenye Li ◽  
Yazhuo Zhang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 82 (8) ◽  
pp. 1302-1315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sajid Iqbal ◽  
Muhammad U. Ghani Khan ◽  
Tanzila Saba ◽  
Zahid Mehmood ◽  
Nadeem Javaid ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 290
Author(s):  
Luca Pasquini ◽  
Antonio Napolitano ◽  
Emanuela Tagliente ◽  
Francesco Dellepiane ◽  
Martina Lucignani ◽  
...  

Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant and wildtype glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) often show overlapping features on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), representing a diagnostic challenge. Deep learning showed promising results for IDH identification in mixed low/high grade glioma populations; however, a GBM-specific model is still lacking in the literature. Our aim was to develop a GBM-tailored deep-learning model for IDH prediction by applying convoluted neural networks (CNN) on multiparametric MRI. We selected 100 adult patients with pathologically demonstrated WHO grade IV gliomas and IDH testing. MRI sequences included: MPRAGE, T1, T2, FLAIR, rCBV and ADC. The model consisted of a 4-block 2D CNN, applied to each MRI sequence. Probability of IDH mutation was obtained from the last dense layer of a softmax activation function. Model performance was evaluated in the test cohort considering categorical cross-entropy loss (CCEL) and accuracy. Calculated performance was: rCBV (accuracy 83%, CCEL 0.64), T1 (accuracy 77%, CCEL 1.4), FLAIR (accuracy 77%, CCEL 1.98), T2 (accuracy 67%, CCEL 2.41), MPRAGE (accuracy 66%, CCEL 2.55). Lower performance was achieved on ADC maps. We present a GBM-specific deep-learning model for IDH mutation prediction, with a maximal accuracy of 83% on rCBV maps. Highest predictivity achieved on perfusion images possibly reflects the known link between IDH and neoangiogenesis through the hypoxia inducible factor.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii359-iii359
Author(s):  
Lydia Tam ◽  
Edward Lee ◽  
Michelle Han ◽  
Jason Wright ◽  
Leo Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Brain tumors are the most common solid malignancies in childhood, many of which develop in the posterior fossa (PF). Manual tumor measurements are frequently required to optimize registration into surgical navigation systems or for surveillance of nonresectable tumors after therapy. With recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), automated MRI-based tumor segmentation is now feasible without requiring manual measurements. Our goal was to create a deep learning model for automated PF tumor segmentation that can register into navigation systems and provide volume output. METHODS 720 pre-surgical MRI scans from five pediatric centers were divided into training, validation, and testing datasets. The study cohort comprised of four PF tumor types: medulloblastoma, diffuse midline glioma, ependymoma, and brainstem or cerebellar pilocytic astrocytoma. Manual segmentation of the tumors by an attending neuroradiologist served as “ground truth” labels for model training and evaluation. We used 2D Unet, an encoder-decoder convolutional neural network architecture, with a pre-trained ResNet50 encoder. We assessed ventricle segmentation accuracy on a held-out test set using Dice similarity coefficient (0–1) and compared ventricular volume calculation between manual and model-derived segmentations using linear regression. RESULTS Compared to the ground truth expert human segmentation, overall Dice score for model performance accuracy was 0.83 for automatic delineation of the 4 tumor types. CONCLUSIONS In this multi-institutional study, we present a deep learning algorithm that automatically delineates PF tumors and outputs volumetric information. Our results demonstrate applied AI that is clinically applicable, potentially augmenting radiologists, neuro-oncologists, and neurosurgeons for tumor evaluation, surveillance, and surgical planning.


IEEE Access ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 55135-55144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neelum Noreen ◽  
Sellappan Palaniappan ◽  
Abdul Qayyum ◽  
Iftikhar Ahmad ◽  
Muhammad Imran ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document