scholarly journals EXPLORING ALIGNMENT-FREE SEQUENCE COMPARISON METHODS TO ELUCIDATE PATTERNS OF EVOLUTION AND HETEROGENEITY IN LONGITUDINAL GLIOMA PATIENT COHORTS

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (suppl_5) ◽  
pp. v348-v348
Author(s):  
Aideen Roddy ◽  
Anna Jurek ◽  
David Gonzalez ◽  
Manuel Salto-Tellez ◽  
Kevin Prise ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrzej Zielezinski ◽  
Hani Z. Girgis ◽  
Guillaume Bernard ◽  
Chris-Andre Leimeister ◽  
Kujin Tang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Young Lu ◽  
Yiwen Wang ◽  
Fang Zhang ◽  
Jiaxing Bai ◽  
Ying Wang

AbstractMotivationUnderstanding the phylogenetic relationship among organisms is the key in contemporary evolutionary study and sequence analysis is the workhorse towards this goal. Conventional approaches to sequence analysis are based on sequence alignment, which is neither scalable to large-scale datasets due to computational inefficiency nor adaptive to next-generation sequencing (NGS) data. Alignment-free approaches are typically used as computationally effective alternatives yet still suffering the high demand of memory consumption. One desirable sequence comparison method at large-scale requires succinctly-organized sequence data management, as well as prompt sequence retrieval given a never-before-seen sequence as query.ResultsIn this paper, we proposed a novel approach, referred to as SAINT, for efficient and accurate alignment-free sequence comparison. Compared to existing alignment-free sequence comparison methods, SAINT offers advantages in two aspects: (1) SAINT is a weakly-supervised learning method where the embedding function is learned automatically from the easily-acquired data; (2) SAINT utilizes the non-linear deep learning-based model which potentially better captures the complicated relationship among genome sequences. We have applied SAINT to real-world datasets to demonstrate its empirical utility, both qualitatively and quantitatively. Considering the extensive applicability of alignment-free sequence comparison methods, we expect SAINT to motivate a more extensive set of applications in sequence comparison at large scale.AvailabilityThe open source, Apache licensed, python-implemented code will be available upon acceptance.Supplementary informationSupplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.


Author(s):  
Natarajan Ramanathan ◽  
Jayalakshmi Ramamurthy ◽  
Ganapathy Natarajan

Background: Biological macromolecules namely, DNA, RNA, and protein have their building blocks organized in a particular sequence and the sequential arrangement encodes evolutionary history of the organism (species). Hence, biological sequences have been used for studying evolutionary relationships among the species. This is usually carried out by multiple sequence algorithms (MSA). Due to certain limitations of MSA, alignment-free sequence comparison methods were developed. The present review is on alignment-free sequence comparison methods carried out using numerical characterization of DNA sequences. Discussion: The graphical representation of DNA sequences by chaos game representation and other 2-dimesnional and 3-dimensional methods are discussed. The evolution of numerical characterization from the various graphical representations and the application of the DNA invariants thus computed in phylogenetic analysis is presented. The extension of computing molecular descriptors in chemometrics to the calculation of new set of DNA invariants and their use in alignment-free sequence comparison in a N-dimensional space and construction of phylogenetic tress is also reviewed. Conclusion: The phylogenetic tress constructed by the alignment-free sequence comparison methods using DNA invariants were found to be better than those constructed using alignment-based tools such as PHLYIP and ClustalW. One of the graphical representation methods is now extended to study viral sequences of infectious diseases for the identification of conserved regions to design peptide-based vaccine by combining numerical characterization and graphical representation.


2014 ◽  
Vol 358 ◽  
pp. 31-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Upuli Gunasinghe ◽  
Damminda Alahakoon ◽  
Susan Bedingfield

2010 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 325-335
Author(s):  
Junmei Jing ◽  
Conrad J. Burden ◽  
Sylvain Forêt ◽  
Susan R. Wilson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document