scholarly journals RADI-16. Efficacy of WBRT among the Sub-types of Metastatic Breast Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii21-iii21
Author(s):  
Shija Mathew ◽  
A S Udaykrishna ◽  
V Lokesh

Abstract Objectives To understand the effect of Whole Brain Radiation (WBRT) in terms of Age, Neurological performance, Radiological Improvement and the Overall Survival. Methods 34 Patients [Median Age: 45 years (31- 65)] with Metastatic Breast Carcinoma who presented with Brain metastasis to the Department of Radiation Oncology at Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology and subjected to Whole Brain Radiotherapy/ Focal RT were taken into the study. The efficacy of WBRT was assessed among the four subtypes of MBC. Results 39% of the patients belonged to Luminal A, 25%, 22% and 14% belonged to Luminal B, Her2 amplified and Basal respectively. Patients under Luminal A, presented with brain metastases by 25 months after the diagnosis of the primary. 60% presented with single lesion, amenable to resection and 58% underwent surgery followed by WBRT and OS fared better as compared to patients with WBRT alone with no distant recurrences on imaging and improvement in KPS. Patients with Luminal B/ HER2 amplified subgroup had predominantly oligometastatic lesions (65%), presented with brain metastases at 15 months after diagnosis of Carcinoma Breast,18% received Herceptin and Lapatinib and 33% and 22% received Herceptin and Lapatinib alone. OS was superior over WBRT alone with exaggerated radiation necrosis in those who took concurrent biological therapy and RT.In patients with Basal subtype,75%had multiple metastatic brain lesions, presented with symptoms by 10 months of diagnosis of the primary with poor KPS and OS remained poor despite WBRT. Conclusions Lesions being amenable for surgery, focal RT to post op cavity alone may be considered in patients with Luminal A. WBRT plus boost for those unfit for surgery. Addition of TKI +/- oral chemo for all patients with Luminal B and HER 2 amplified to Focal RT or WBRT. Triple Negative patients present with poor KPS can be considered for BSC/WBRT on case basis.

2016 ◽  
Vol 125 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 26-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Mix ◽  
Rania Elmarzouky ◽  
Tracey O'Connor ◽  
Robert Plunkett ◽  
Dheerendra Prasad

OBJECTIVEGamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is used to treat brain metastases from breast cancer (BMB) as the sole treatment or in conjunction with tumor resection and/or whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). This study evaluates outcomes in BMB based on treatment techniques and tumor biological features.METHODSThe authors reviewed all patients treated with BMB between 2004 and 2014. Patients were identified from a prospectively collected radiosurgery database and institutional tumor registry; 214 patients were identified. Data were collected from aforementioned sources and supplemented with chart review where needed. Independent radiological review was performed for all available brain imaging in those treated with GKRS. Survival analyses are reported using Kaplan-Meier estimates.RESULTSDuring the 10-year study period, 214 patients with BMB were treated; 23% underwent GKRS alone, 46% underwent a combination of GKRS and WBRT, and 31% underwent WBRT alone. Median survival after diagnosis of BMB in those treated with GKRS alone was 21 months, and in those who received WBRT alone it was 3 months. In those treated with GKRS plus WBRT, no significant difference in median survival was observed between those receiving WBRT upfront or in a salvage setting following GKRS (19 months vs 14 months, p = 0.63). The median survival of patients with total metastatic tumor volume of ≤ 7 cm3 versus > 7 cm3 was 20 months vs 7 months (p < 0.001). Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (Her-2) positively impacted survival after diagnosis of BMB (19 months vs 12 months, p = 0.03). Estrogen receptor status did not influence survival after diagnosis of BMB. No difference was observed in survival after diagnosis of BMB based on receptor status in those who received WBRT alone.CONCLUSIONSIn this single-institution series of BMB, the addition of WBRT to GKRS did not significantly influence survival, nor did the number of lesions treated with GKRS. Survival after the diagnosis of BMB was most strongly affected by Her-2 positivity and total metastatic tumor volume.


Author(s):  
Dianne Hartgerink ◽  
Anna Bruynzeel ◽  
Danielle Eekers ◽  
Ans Swinnen ◽  
Coen Hurkmans ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The clinical value of whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for brain metastases (BM) is a matter of debate due to the significant side effects involved. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an attractive alternative treatment option that may avoid these side effects and improve local tumor control. We initiated a randomized trial (NCT02353000) to investigate whether quality of life is better preserved after SRS compared with WBRT in patients with multiple brain metastases. Methods Patients with 4 to 10 BM were randomized between the standard arm WBRT (total dose 20 Gy in 5 fractions) or SRS (single fraction or 3 fractions). The primary endpoint was the difference in quality of life (QOL) at three months post-treatment. Results The study was prematurely closed due to poor accrual. A total of 29 patients (13%) were randomized, of which 15 patients have been treated with SRS and 14 patients with WBRT. The median number of lesions were 6 (range, 4-9) and the median total treatment volume was 13.0 cc 3 (range, 1.8-25.9 cc 3). QOL at three months decreased in the SRS group by 0.1 (SD=0.2), compared to 0.2 (SD=0.2) in the WBRT group (p=0.23). The actuarial one-year survival rates were 57% (SRS) and 31% (WBRT) (p=0.52). The actuarial one-year brain salvage-free survival rates were 50% (SRS) and 78% (WBRT) (p=0.22). Conclusion In patients with 4 to 10 BM, SRS alone resulted in one-year survival for 57% of patients while maintaining quality of life. Due to the premature closure of the trial, no statistically significant differences could be determined.


CNS Oncology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 401-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Macarena de la Fuente ◽  
Kathryn Beal ◽  
Richard Carvajal ◽  
Thomas J Kaley

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document