scholarly journals Diagnosis of primary central nervous system lymphoma: a systematic review of the utility of CSF screening and the role of early brain biopsy

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 415-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexis A Morell ◽  
Ashish H Shah ◽  
Claudio Cavallo ◽  
Daniel G Eichberg ◽  
Christopher A Sarkiss ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Because less-invasive techniques can obviate the need for brain biopsy in the diagnosis of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), it is common practice to wait for a thorough initial work-up, which may delay treatment. We conducted a systematic review and reviewed our own series of patients to define the role of LP and early brain biopsy in the diagnosis of PCNSL. Methods Our study was divided into 2 main sections: 1) systematic review assessing the sensitivity of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis on the diagnosis of PCNSL, and 2) a retrospective, single-center patient series assessing the diagnostic accuracy and safety of early biopsy in immunocompetent PCNSL patients treated at our institution from 2012 to 2018. Results Our systematic review identified 1481 patients with PCNSL. A preoperative LP obviated surgery in 7.4% of cases. Brain biopsy was the preferred method of diagnosis in 95% of patients followed by CSF (3.1%). In our institutional series, brain biopsy was diagnostic in 92.3% of cases (24/26) with 2 cases that required a second procedure for diagnosis. Perioperative morbidity was noted in 7.6% of cases (n = 2) due to hemorrhages after stereotactic brain biopsy that improved at follow-up. Conclusions The diagnostic yield of CSF analyses for PCNSL in immunocompetent patients remains exceedingly low. Our institutional series demonstrates that early biopsy for PCNSL is safe and accurate, and may avert protracted work-ups. We conclude that performing an early brain biopsy in a suspected case of PCNSL is a valid, safe option to minimize diagnostic delay.

Author(s):  
Mashary Binnahil ◽  
Karolyn Au ◽  
Jian-Qiang Lu ◽  
Blaise Matthew Wheatley ◽  
Tejas Sankar

AbstractClassical neurosurgical teaching suggests that corticosteroid administration reduces the diagnostic yield of stereotactic brain biopsy for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). In a single-center series spanning 6 years, we reviewed 155 consecutive biopsy patients, 135 treated with prebiopsy corticosteroids. PCNSL was correctly diagnosed on initial biopsy in 15 of 16 steroid-treated patients; in the single nondiagnostic specimen, polymerase chain reaction reanalysis by an outside institution showed evidence of lymphoproliferative disease consistent with PCNSL. Our data challenge the notion that it is necessary to withhold corticosteroid therapy for cerebral edema in patients awaiting stereotactic biopsy for suspected PCNSL.


2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (8) ◽  
pp. 030006052110351
Author(s):  
Kosuke Matsuzono ◽  
Tomoya Yagisawa ◽  
Keisuke Ohtani ◽  
Yohei Ishishita ◽  
Takashi Yamaguchi ◽  
...  

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, but its diagnosis is challenging in some cases. A brain biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosing PCNSL, but its invasiveness can be problematic. Thus, noninvasive imaging examinations have been developed for the pre-surgical diagnosis of PCNSL, including gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 123I-N-isopropyl-p-iodoamphetamine single-photon emission computed tomography (123I-IMP SPECT), and positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG PET). Here, we report the case of a 71-year-old woman with negative imaging findings for PCNSL, but who was diagnosed with PCNSL by a brain biopsy and histological analysis. Her imaging results were negative for gadolinium-enhanced cranial MRI, with low uptake in 123I-IMP SPECT and hypometabolism in 18F-FDG PET. However, a stereotactic brain biopsy from an abnormal lesion revealed that many round cells had infiltrated into the brain. Moreover, many infiltrating cells were positive for cluster of differentiation (CD)20 and CD79a, and proliferation marker protein Ki-67-positive cells accounted for nearly 80% of all cells. Based on these results, our final pathological diagnosis was PCNSL. The present case highlights the possibility of a PCNSL diagnosis even when all imaging-related examinations display negative results.


BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Scheichel ◽  
Franz Marhold ◽  
Daniel Pinggera ◽  
Barbara Kiesel ◽  
Tobias Rossmann ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Corticosteroid therapy (CST) prior to biopsy may hinder histopathological diagnosis in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). Therefore, preoperative CST in patients with suspected PCNSL should be avoided if clinically possible. The aim of this study was thus to analyze the difference in the rate of diagnostic surgeries in PCNSL patients with and without preoperative CST. Methods A multicenter retrospective study including all immunocompetent patients diagnosed with PCNSL between 1/2004 and 9/2018 at four neurosurgical centers in Austria was conducted and the results were compared to literature. Results A total of 143 patients were included in this study. All patients showed visible contrast enhancement on preoperative MRI. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of diagnostic surgeries with and without preoperative CST with 97.1% (68/70) and 97.3% (71/73), respectively (p = 1.0). Tapering and pause of CST did not influence the diagnostic rate. Including our study, there are 788 PCNSL patients described in literature with an odds ratio for inconclusive surgeries after CST of 3.3 (CI 1.7–6.4). Conclusions Preoperative CST should be avoided as it seems to diminish the diagnostic rate of biopsy in PCNSL patients. Yet, if CST has been administered preoperatively and there is still a contrast enhancing lesion to target for biopsy, surgeons should try to keep the diagnostic delay to a minimum as the likelihood for acquiring diagnostic tissue seems sufficiently high.


2017 ◽  
Vol 96 (7) ◽  
pp. 1163-1173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyunsoo Cho ◽  
Se Hoon Kim ◽  
Soo-Jeong Kim ◽  
Jong Hee Chang ◽  
Woo Ick Yang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jonas Zacher ◽  
Bettina Schmidtke ◽  
Benjamin Kasenda ◽  
Andreas Engert ◽  
Nicole Skoetz

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacoline E. C. Bromberg ◽  
Matthijs van der Meulen ◽  
Jeanette K. Doorduijn

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document