scholarly journals 448. COVID-19 Acute Care at Home: A Substitution for Hospitalization in Patients with Mild Symptoms

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S325-S325
Author(s):  
Joel A Kammeyer ◽  
Brian Perkins ◽  
Sara Seegert ◽  
Dave E Caris ◽  
Caitlyn M Hollingshead ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Constraints on resources require healthcare systems to implement alternative and innovative means for delivering care. The COVID-19 pandemic amplified this issue throughout the world, leading to shortages of ventilators, hospital beds, and healthcare personnel. We report the results of an Acute Care at Home Program (ACHP) response to COVID-19, providing in-home hospital-level care to patients with mild symptoms, preserving in-hospital beds for more serious illness. Methods Patients with COVID-19 were selected for ACHP after undergoing risk stratification for severe disease, including oxygen evaluation, time course of illness, and evaluation of comorbidities. Patients admitted to ACH met inpatient criteria, required oxygen supplementation of ≤4 liters, and received insurance approval. Services were provided consistent with best practice of inpatient care, including 24/7 provider availability via TeleMedicine, bedside care provided by paramedics and nurses, respiratory therapy, radiology and laboratory services, pulse oximetry monitoring, and administration of medications. Protocols existed for patient transfer to hospital in the event of clinical deterioration. Results Our initial cohort included 62 patients enrolled October 1, 2020 – May 31, 2021. Of these, 57 patients were discharged successfully from ACHP. Patients presented with initial oxygen requirements of 0-4 liters. Average length-of-stay in ACHP was 5.4 days. Five patients required hospitalization after enrollment in ACHP; one subsequently expired, two were discharged home, one returned to ACHP after inpatient hospitalization, and one remains hospitalized. One additional patient that was successfully discharged home from ACHP was later readmitted and expired in a subsequent hospitalization. The patients that expired had significant immunocompromising conditions that may have contributed to their outcomes. Conclusion ACHP can provide care equivalent to hospitalization for select COVID-19 patients. Immunocompromised hosts with COVID-19 may represent a subset of patients in which in-house hospitalization must be carefully considered, even with mild oxygen requirements. Health systems should consider ACHP as a substitution for hospitalization for COVID-19 patients with mild symptoms. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (Suppl_3) ◽  
pp. iii1-iii12
Author(s):  
Ann McCann ◽  
Patricia McCaffrey ◽  
Gail Nicholson ◽  
Eamon Farrell

2001 ◽  
Vol 49 (8) ◽  
pp. 1123-1125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce Leff
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii17-iii65
Author(s):  
Deborah Toal ◽  
DrPatricia McCaffrey

Abstract Background The Aim of the Acute Care at Home Team is to provide acute care to over 65's in the patient's own home, providing assessment and treatment of acute conditions such as pneumonia, urinary sepsis and heart failure. It is a multidisciplinary team that works together to streamline services to enable a patient to stay safely in their own home. A full comprehensive geriatric assessment is carried out in all patients to help improve patient outcomes. The patients have full access to in patient services such as scans, and x-rays. All blood tests are treated as urgent to ensure the patient is in no way disadvantaged by being treated by acute care at home compared with hospital care. The aims and objectives are to explore patient and family experiences and identify any areas for improvement. Methods A service users and carers experience Questionnaire (N=31) was used to gain insight into how satisfied the patient or family were with the service and what the experience was like having the team come into their home. Results Patient satisfaction with this Acute Care at Home Team was reported at 100%. Patients were happy with the care they received, 100% of patients were happy with staff's knowledge of their condition and treatment plan. All of the respondents stated they would both recommend the service and use it again. The qualitative responses were in keeping with 100% satisfaction in that they were positive in nature. Conclusion This service evaluation has shown that patient and carer experience of this Acute Care at Home Team is a positive one, with 100% satisfaction levels. There are some small areas to be improved upon, however the results show this service is providing the over 65 population with a good experience of being treated at home as an alternative to hospital care when acutely unwell.


2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 281-283
Author(s):  
Kevin Worth ◽  
Laure Lisk ◽  
Elizabeth Ann Scruth
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 64 (12) ◽  
pp. 2572-2576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen A. Abrashkin ◽  
Jonathan Washko ◽  
Jenny Zhang ◽  
Asantewaa Poku ◽  
Hyun Kim ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
David Michael Levine ◽  
Henry Mitchell ◽  
Nicole Rosario ◽  
Robert B. Boxer ◽  
Charles A. Morris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eamon Farrell ◽  
Patricia McCaffrey ◽  
Roisin Toner ◽  
Catherine Sheeran

2017 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. S4-S5
Author(s):  
A. Stuck ◽  
C. Crowley ◽  
V.T. Tolia ◽  
A.A. Kreshak ◽  
J.P. Killeen ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (suppl_5) ◽  
pp. v13-v60
Author(s):  
Anna Louise Alexander ◽  
Gail Nicholson ◽  
Patricia McCaffrey
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii17-iii65
Author(s):  
Ann McCann ◽  
Patricia McCaffrey ◽  
Deborah Toal

Abstract Background The population is ageing. Acute Care at Home (AC@H) is a consultant led multidisciplinary team, providing acute non-critical care to our older population, preventing hospital admissions and promoting a better quality of life and supporting them to live independently for longer. A recent Cochrane review shows that older people who receive Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment rather than routine medical care after admission to hospital are more likely to be living at home and are less likely to be admitted to a nursing home at up to a year after hospital admission. Methods One-hundred patient charts were selected at random who had been under the AC@H team between 2016 and 2018. The nursing and medical assessments were reviewed to assess how well Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment was being carried out. The domains selected for audit are shown in the results table Results The domains were assessed appropriately as follows in percentages - Dementia 93%, Delerium 85%, Depression 6%, Falls, 99%, Fractures/Osteoporosis: 27%, Medication/Polypharmacy: 100%, Pain: 91%, Nutrition: 98%, Skin: 93%, Incontinence: 94%, Advanced Care Planning: 39%, Visual Acuity: 7%, Social Support: 99% Conclusion Whilst some areas of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment are achieved adequately, others are not. Our electronic assessment did not include a Geriatric Depression Score. Although pain was frequently assessed, again a score was not always used. Other areas for improvement include visual acuity, fractures and osteoporosis and advanced care planning The results of this audit have been presented to the team, adjustments have been made to our electronic assessments so that we can record and capture this data better. There will be a reaudit in 6 month’s to evaluate improvement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document