scholarly journals Diagnostic Accuracy of Novel and Traditional Rapid Tests Compared to Reverse-Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction for Influenza Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Merckx ◽  
Rehab Wali ◽  
Ian Schiller ◽  
Genevieve C. Gore ◽  
Caroline Chartrand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Reverse Transcription ◽  
Influenza Infection ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Rapid Tests ◽  
Polymerase Chain

scholarly journals Exploring the Clinical Utility of Gustatory Dysfunction (GD) as a Triage Symptom Prior to Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) in the Diagnosis of COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Life ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1315
Author(s):  
Khang Wen Pang ◽  
Sher-Lyn Tham ◽  
Li Shia Ng
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Reverse Transcription ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Upper Respiratory Tract ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Background: The diagnosis of COVID-19 is made using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) but its sensitivity varies from 20 to 100%. The presence of gustatory dysfunction (GD) in a patient with upper respiratory tract symptoms might increase the clinical suspicion of COVID-19. Aims: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR−) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of using GD as a triage symptom prior to RT-PCR. Methods: PubMed and Embase were searched up to 20 June 2021. Studies published in English were included if they compared the frequency of GD in COVID-19 adult patients (proven by RT-PCR) to COVID-19 negative controls in case control or cross-sectional studies. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Results: 21,272 COVID-19 patients and 52,298 COVID-19 negative patients were included across 44 studies from 21 countries. All studies were of moderate to high risk of bias. Patients with GD were more likely to test positive for COVID-19: DOR 6.39 (4.86–8.40), LR+ 3.84 (3.04–4.84), LR− 0.67 (0.64–0.70), pooled sensitivity 0.37 (0.29–0.47) and pooled specificity 0.92 (0.89–0.94). While history/questionnaire-based assessments were predictive of RT-PCR positivity (DOR 6.62 (4.95–8.85)), gustatory testing was not (DOR 3.53 (0.98–12.7)). There was significant heterogeneity among the 44 studies (I2 = 92%, p < 0.01). Conclusions: GD is useful as a symptom to determine if a patient should undergo further testing, especially in resource-poor regions where COVID-19 testing is scarce. Patients with GD may be advised to quarantine while repeated testing is performed if the initial RT-PCR is negative. Funding: None.

scholarly journals Accuracy of chest computed tomography and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in diagnosis of 2019 novel coronavirus disease; a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. e36-e36
Author(s):  
Kamyar Shokraee ◽  
Hossein Mahdavi ◽  
Parsa Panahi ◽  
Farnoosh Seirafianpour ◽  
Amir Mohammad Jahromizadeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Reverse Transcription ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Chest Computed Tomography ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Introduction: This study aims to measure the diagnostic accuracy of chest computed tomography (CT) and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay (RT-PCR) in COVID-19 in a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar, WHO, SSRN, and MedRxiv have been searched on March 26, 2020 for all the alternative names of the disease and virus. Risk of bias assessment was based on QUADAS-2. Data from English-language studies after January 12, 2019 were pooled to calculate necessary diagnostic values and underwent diagnostic test accuracy, random-effects, proportions, and subgroup meta-analysis. Results: Pooled from 27 included studies, the sensitivity of chest CT was calculated 96.6%, specificity 22.5%, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) 8.2, positive likelihood ratio (PLR) 1.2 (95% CI: 1.1-1.4), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) 0.15 (95% CI: 0.1-0.3). The sensitivity for initial RT-PCR was 79.7%, the specificity 100%, and NLR 0.18. Conclusion: Considering the results, in order to diagnose COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019), it is recommended to initially performing chest CT to rule out the uninfected people. In suspicious cases, we suggest RT-PCR to confirm the disease. Performing serial RT-PCR instead of the one-time test is highly recommended, to let the viral loads reach the diagnostic levels, especially in cases of high clinical suspicion.

scholarly journals Role of Chest Computed Tomography versus Real Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction for Diagnosis of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Dina M. Ali ◽  
Lamiaa G. Zake ◽  
Nevine K. El Kady
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Reverse Transcription ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Chest Computed Tomography ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Background. The current global pandemic of COVID-19 is considered a public health emergency. The diagnosis of COVID-19 depends on detection of the viral nucleic acid by real time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). However, false-negative RT-PCR tests are reported and could hinder the control of the pandemic. Chest computed tomography could achieve a more reliable diagnosis and represent a complementary diagnostic tool. Aim. To perform a meta-analysis and systematic review to find out the role of chest computed tomography versus RT-PCR for precise diagnosis of COVID-19 infection. Methods. We searched three electronic databases (PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus) from April 1 to April 20, 2020, to find out articles including the accuracy of chest computed tomography scan versus RT-PCR for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Observational studies, case series, and case reports were included. Results. A total of 238 articles were retrieved from the search strategy. Following screening, 39 articles were chosen for full text assessment and finally 35 articles were included for qualitative and quantitative analysis. Chest computed tomography showed a wide range of sensitivity varied from 12%–100%. Conclusion. Chest computed tomography is playing a key role for diagnosis and detection of COVID-19 infection. Computed tomography image findings may precede the initially positive RT-PCR assay.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document