scholarly journals Durability of Benefits of Behavioral Interventions on Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescribing in Primary Care: Follow-up From a Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Linder ◽  
Daniella Meeker ◽  
Craig Fox ◽  
Mark Friedberg ◽  
Stephen Persell ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arritxu Etxeberria ◽  
Itziar Pérez ◽  
Idoia Alcorta ◽  
Jose Ignacio Emparanza ◽  
Elena Ruiz de Velasco ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 98 (8) ◽  
pp. 977-983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger Ruiz Moral ◽  
Luis Angel Pérula de Torres ◽  
Laura Pulido Ortega ◽  
Margarita Criado Larumbe ◽  
Ana Roldán Villalobos ◽  
...  

Addiction ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 106 (9) ◽  
pp. 1696-1706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Cabezas ◽  
Mamta Advani ◽  
Diana Puente ◽  
Teresa Rodriguez-Blanco ◽  
Carlos Martin ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Jesús Santamaría-Martín ◽  
Susana Martín Iglesias ◽  
Christine Schwarz ◽  
Milagros Rico-Blázquez ◽  
Julián Alexander Portocarrero-Nuñez ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The rates of exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months in Spain are far from the target recommended by the World Health Organization, which is 50% by 2025. Evidence of the effectiveness of group interventions in late postpartum is limited. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the PROLACT group educational intervention for increasing the proportion of mother-child dyads with exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months compared to the usual practice in primary care.Method: Multicentre cluster randomized clinical trial. A total of 434 mother-child dyads (215 in the control group and 219 in the intervention group) who breastfed exclusively in the first 4 weeks of the infant's life and agreed to participate were included. The main outcome variable was exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months. Secondary variables were the type of breastfeeding, reasons for abandonment, degree of adherence and satisfaction with the intervention. To study the effectiveness, the difference in the proportions of dyads with exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months was calculated, and the relative risk (RR) and number needed to treat (NNT) were calculated with their 95% CIs. To study the factors associated with the maintenance of exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months, a multilevel logistic regression model was fitted. All analyses were performed according to intention to treat.Results: The percentage of dyads with exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months was 22.4% in the intervention group and 8.8% in the control group. The PROLACT intervention obtained an RR of 2.53 (95% CI 1.54-4.15) and an NNT of 7 (95% CI 5-14). The factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months were the PROLACT intervention, OR 3.51 (95% CI 1.55-7.93); age > 39 years, OR 2.79 (95% CI 1.02-7.6); previous breastfeeding experience, OR 2.61 (95% CI 1.29-5.29); monthly income/person > 833.33 €, OR 2.15 (95% CI: 0.996-4.65); planning to start work before the infant was 6 months old, OR 0.35 (0.19-0.63); and use of a pacifier, OR 0.58 (95% CI 0.30-1.11).Conclusions: The PROLACT group educational intervention in primary care is more effective than the usual practice for maintaining exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months.Trial registration: The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov under code number NCT01869920 (03/06/2013).


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
EDUARDO OLANO-ESPINOSA ◽  
Jose Francisco Avila-Tomas ◽  
Cesar Minue-Lorenzo ◽  
Blanca Matilla Pardo ◽  
Encarnación Serrano-Serrano ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND The magnitude and severity of smoking, the benefits of quitting, and the existence of effective and efficient interventions make it a priority problem. Health professionals intervene less than they should, and the most effective interventions are more expensive, require specific training and more time, which is a disadvantage for the service provider and for the accessibility of the services. Information and communication technologies avoid these problems thanks to their accessibility, privacy, customization possibilities, access to social support, and scalability. OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness of an evidence-based intervention to cease smoking via a chatbot in the smartphone compared to usual clinical practice in primary care. METHODS Pragmatic randomized clinical trial in 34 primary healthcare centers within the Madrid Health Service (Spain). Smokers over 18 years of age who attended on-site consultation and accepted help to quit tobacco were recruited by their doctor or nurse and randomly allocated to receive usual care (control group, CG) or an evidence-based chatbot intervention (intervention group, IG). The interventions in both arms were based on the 5A´s by the US clinical practice guideline, which combines behavioral and pharmacological treatments and is structured in several follow-up appointments. The primary outcome was continuous abstinence from smoking that was biochemically validated after 6 months by the collaborators. The outcome analysis was blinded to allocation of subjects although participants were unblinded to group assignment. An intention-to-treat analysis, entering the basal observation carried forward in cases of missing data, and logistic regression models with robust estimators were employed for assessing the primary outcomes. RESULTS The trial was conducted between October 1st of 2018 and March 31st of 2019. The sample comprised 513 patients (242 in the IG and 271 in the CG), with an average age of 49.8 years (SD 10.82) and gender ratio of 59.3% women and 40.7% men. Of them, 232 patients (45.2%) completed the follow-up, 104 (42.9%) in the IG and 128 (47.2%) in the CG. Main outcome: In the intention-to-treat analysis, the biochemically-validated abstinence rate at 6 months was higher in the IG with 26.03% (63/242) versus 18.82% (51/271) in the CG (odds ratio (OR)=1.52, 95% CI: 1.00–2.31, P=.05). After adjusting for basal CO-oxymetry and bupropion intake, no substantial changes were observed (OR=1.52, 95% CI 0.99–2.33 P= .053; pseudo R2=0.045). In the IG, 61.16% (148/242) of users accessed the chatbot, average bot-patient interaction time was 121 minutes (CI 95% 121.1–140.0), and average number of contacts was 45.56 (SD 36.32). CONCLUSIONS A treatment including a chatbot for helping in tobacco cessation was more effective than usual clinical practice in primary care. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov, reference number NCT 03445507.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel del Cura-González ◽  
Juan A. Lopez-Rodriguez ◽  
Francisca Leiva-Fernández ◽  
Antonio Gimeno-Miguel ◽  
Beatriz Poblador-Plou ◽  
...  

BMJ ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 346 (jun05 2) ◽  
pp. f2570-f2570 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. Gallo ◽  
K. H. Morales ◽  
H. R. Bogner ◽  
P. J. Raue ◽  
J. Zee ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter M Yellowlees ◽  
Michelle Burke Parish ◽  
Alvaro D Gonzalez ◽  
Steven R Chan ◽  
Donald M Hilty ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Asynchronous Telepsychiatry (ATP) consultations (delayed time) can extend psychiatric expertise into primary care, and across languages. OBJECTIVE This is the first clinical outcomes study of ATP compared with Synchronous (real time) Telepsychiatry (STP), the current gold standard telepsychiatry “usual care” method. We hypothesized that patients in the ATP arm would show a better clinical trajectory than those in the STP arm as measured by clinician and patient self-reported ratings of depression, global functioning and health outcomes. METHODS In this randomized clinical trial 36 Primary Care Physicians (PCP) referred a heterogeneous sample of 401 treatment seeking adult depressed or anxious patients over a 5- year period from 3 primary care clinics. 184 English and Spanish speaking participants were enrolled and randomized, of whom 160 (80 ATP, 80 STP) completed baseline evaluations and were entered into the 2-year follow up study. Patients were treated by their PCPs in consultation with University of California Davis Health (UCDH) psychiatrists who consulted with the patients every 6 months for up to 2 years using ATP or STP and then made treatment recommendations to the PCP’s. Patients’ depression, clinical global functioning and health outcomes were assessed every 6 months using both clinician (primary outcomes) and patient (secondary outcomes) self-reported ratings. RESULTS Patients in both ATP and STP groups had significant improvements at 6- and 12-month follow-up on both clinician-rated outcomes. There were no significant differences in improvement between ATP and STP on any clinician or patient self-reported ratings at any follow-up. Drop-out rates at 1 year were 63/160, and at 2 years were 114/143, all somewhat higher for STP than ATP. 19% of the CONCLUSIONS This trial provides evidence of the clinical validity of ATP in English and Spanish speaking primary care patients and may be a key part of a stepped series of mental health interventions available within the primary care treatment setting. ATP presents a possible solution to the workforce shortage of psychiatrists and to the provision of mental healthcare in the home. CLINICALTRIAL NCT02084979


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document