Commentary: Illustrated Guide to the Transradial Approach for Neuroendovascular Surgery: A Step-by-Step Description Gleaned From Over 500 Cases at an Early Adopter Single Center

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. E324-E325
Author(s):  
Jason Lee Choi ◽  
Ali Alaraj
2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mithun G Sattur ◽  
Eyad Almallouhi ◽  
Jonathan R Lena ◽  
Alejandro M Spiotta

Abstract BACKGROUND Traditionally, neuroangiography for diagnosis and therapy has been achieved via the transfemoral route. Femoral access, however, has been associated with catastrophic complications. Although transradial access (TRA) has been adopted late by the field of neuroendovascular surgery, several groups have recently demonstrated a dramatically safe and rapid learning curve with a radial-first approach. However, there is a need for a detailed illustrative approach on the transradial technique. OBJECTIVE To provide a detailed description of the operative technique with step-by-step illustrations derived from our single center series of 506 cases, as an early adopter. METHODS A step-by-step illustrated approach to our technique of transradial angiography is provided, based on our clinical experience of an early radial-first approach. Prospective review of patients undergoing transradial angiography and interventions from April 1 to November 30, 2019, at our institution was performed. We included all cases that received radial-first arterial access for diagnostic and interventional neuroangiography. Efficacy, complications, catheter use, and radiation metrics of TRA for the entire cohort were noted. The radial approach was described in 4 stages beginning from the wrist (Stage I) and ending with distal access to target vessel of interest (Stage IV). RESULTS A total of 506 patients underwent TRA over the 7-mo period. Procedural success was achieved in 92.3% of patients (93.7% for diagnostic and 88.5% for interventional). Crossover to the femoral route occurred in 33 (6.5%) cases (25 diagnostic and 8 interventional). The majority occurred in Stage I. No major complications were noted. CONCLUSION Our preferred technique for the transradial approach provides excellent safety and efficacy in performing diagnostic and interventional neuroangiography. The illustrated technical steps are expected to provide guidance for early adopters of TRA.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 502-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lewandowski Pawel ◽  
Gralak-Lachowska Dagmara ◽  
Maciejewski Pawel ◽  
Ramotowski Bogumil ◽  
Budaj Andrzej ◽  
...  

Abstract Hemostatic devices used in the transradial approach (TRA) and transulnar approach (TUA) are limited. This study compared the efficacy and safety of hemostasis using the QuikClot Radial hemostatic pad (QC) vs. standard mechanical compression (SC) after coronary angiography (CAG). This prospective single-center randomized trial included CAG patients. The primary and secondary endpoints were efficacy (successful hemostasis) and safety (total artery occlusion [TAO], pseudoaneurysm, hematoma), respectively. A visual analog scale (VAS) evaluated patient pain during compression. In 2013–2017, 200 patients were randomized 2 × 2 into the: (1) TRA and TUA groups and (2) QC and SC groups. Successful hemostasis was achieved in 92 (92%) patients in the QC group and 100 (100%) patients in the SC group (p < 0.006). The TRA SC subgroup showed significantly better results than the TRA QC subgroup (100% vs. 90.0%; p < 0.03). Similar results were obtained in the TUA QC and TUA SC subgroups (95% vs. 100%; p = 0.5). The secondary endpoint was achieved in the QC and SC groups (8% vs. 9%; p = 0.8). Patients reported significantly less pain during QC application than during SC (VAS: 2.6 ± 2.6 vs. 3.4 ± 2.9; p < 0.03). In patients undergoing CAG with TRA or TUA, QC was associated with lower efficacy, less discomfort, and similar safety compared to SC.


2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. S309
Author(s):  
D. Goldman ◽  
D. Bageac ◽  
C. Kellner ◽  
A. Fischman ◽  
P. Faries ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (C) ◽  
pp. 24
Author(s):  
Damian Maciejewski* ◽  
Lukasz Tekieli ◽  
Anna Kablak-Ziembicka ◽  
Piotr Paluszek ◽  
Mariusz Trystula ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 313-318
Author(s):  
D.T. Goldman ◽  
D. Bageac ◽  
A. Mills ◽  
B. Yim ◽  
K. Yaeger ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document