scholarly journals In Reply: Risk of Brain Herniation After Craniotomy With Preoperative Lumbar Spinal Drainage: A Single-Surgeon Experience of 365 Patients Among 3000 Major Cranial Cases

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon C Lane ◽  
Robert Scranton ◽  
Aaron A Cohen-Gadol
Author(s):  
Brandon C Lane ◽  
Robert Scranton ◽  
Aaron A Cohen-Gadol

Abstract BACKGROUND Lumbar spinal drainage (LSD) can significantly facilitate brain relaxation and improve ease of surgical goals for a variety of neurosurgical indications. Although rapid drainage of large volumes of spinal fluid can theoretically produce shifts in brain compartments and herniation syndromes, the clinical significance of this phenomenon when LSD is used immediately before craniotomy is unclear. OBJECTIVE To report a large single-surgeon consecutive experience with symptomatic brain herniation after lumbar drainage before craniotomy. METHODS Included were 365 patients who underwent LSD with either lumbar drain or lumbar puncture for a variety of different neurosurgical pathologies between 2008 and 2018 immediately before craniotomy. We reviewed the surgical indications, craniotomy location, approach, type of LSD, presence of postoperative brain herniation on imaging, type of herniation, clinical symptoms, lesion pathology, and 30-d modified Rankin Scale score for each patient. RESULTS There was no patient who suffered from the development of new or worsening symptomatic or radiological brain herniation directly related to use of immediate preoperative LSD. This included 204 supratentorial and 161 infratentorial procedures. Surgical indications included 188 tumors, 5 aneurysms, 37 arteriovenous malformations, 2 revascularization procedures, 97 microvascular decompressions, 10 optic nerve decompressions requiring extradural clinoidectomy for tumor removal, and 26 “other” pathologies. CONCLUSION Brain herniation did not occur postoperatively with the use of immediate preoperative LSD in our series, regardless of craniotomy location, pathology, extent of mass effect, or approach. Our experience suggests that LSD is a potentially safe preoperative adjunct that can be used to facilitate surgical objectives.


10.14444/4034 ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satyajit V. Marawar ◽  
Ian A. Madom ◽  
Mark Palumbo ◽  
Richard A. Tallarico ◽  
Nathaniel R. Ordway ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 130 (5) ◽  
pp. 1710-1720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasushi Motoyama ◽  
Tsukasa Nakajima ◽  
Yoshiaki Takamura ◽  
Tsutomu Nakazawa ◽  
Daisuke Wajima ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVELumbar spinal drainage (LSD) during neurosurgery can have an important effect by facilitating a smooth procedure when needed. However, LSD is quite invasive, and the pathology of brain herniation associated with LSD has become known recently. The objective of this study was to determine the risk of postoperative brain herniation after craniotomy with LSD in neurosurgery overall.METHODSIncluded were 239 patients who underwent craniotomy with LSD for various types of neurological diseases between January 2007 and December 2016. The authors performed propensity score matching to establish a proper control group taken from among 1424 patients who underwent craniotomy and met the inclusion criteria during the same period. The incidences of postoperative brain herniation between the patients who underwent craniotomy with LSD (group A, n = 239) and the matched patients who underwent craniotomy without LSD (group B, n = 239) were compared.RESULTSBrain herniation was observed in 24 patients in group A and 8 patients in group B (OR 3.21, 95% CI 1.36–8.46, p = 0.005), but the rate of favorable outcomes was higher in group A (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.18–2.76, p = 0.005). Of the 24 patients, 18 had uncal herniation, 5 had central herniation, and 1 had uncal and subfalcine herniation; 8 patients with other than subarachnoid hemorrhage were included. Significant differences in the rates of deep approach (OR 5.12, 95% CI 1.8–14.5, p = 0.002) and temporal craniotomy (OR 10.2, 95% CI 2.3–44.8, p = 0.002) were found between the 2 subgroups (those with and those without herniation) in group A. In 5 patients, brain herniation proceeded even after external decompression (ED). Cox regression analysis revealed that the risk of brain herniation related to LSD increased with ED (hazard ratio 3.326, 95% CI 1.491–7.422, p < 0.001). Among all 1424 patients, ED resulted in progression or deterioration of brain herniation more frequently in those who underwent LSD than it did in those who did not undergo LSD (OR 9.127, 95% CI 1.82–62.1, p = 0.004).CONCLUSIONSBrain herniation downward to the tentorial hiatus is more likely to occur after craniotomy with LSD than after craniotomy without LSD. Using a deep approach and craniotomy involving the temporal areas are risk factors for brain herniation related to LSD. Additional ED would aggravate brain herniation after LSD. The risk of brain herniation after placement of a lumbar spinal drain during neurosurgery must be considered even when LSD is essential.


2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 336-336
Author(s):  
Allison Frisella ◽  
Caroline D Ames ◽  
David Lieber ◽  
Ramakrishna Venkatesh ◽  
Peter G. Schulam ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 677-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith H. Bridwell

Author(s):  
Milan Spaić ◽  
N. Živković ◽  
M. Samardžić ◽  
I. Popović ◽  
V. Aleksić

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document