The Role of the Visor Flap in Scalp Reconstruction: A Case Series of 21 Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 651-655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Ellis ◽  
Lisa Hwang ◽  
Ni-Ka Ford ◽  
Konstantin Slavin

Abstract BACKGROUND Full-thickness scalp defects pose a reconstructive problem, especially in the setting of infection, chemotherapy/radiation, and underlying cranial defects. Current options include dermal matrices, skin grafts, and local flaps. Local flaps often fail, requiring subsequent microvascular free flap reconstruction. OBJECTIVE To describe the visor flap, a novel bipedicled advancement flap design, and its role in reconstruction of scalp defects. METHODS A retrospective review of 21 adult patients who developed scalp defects reconstructed using the visor flap from 2013 to 2017. The visor flap is a large bipedicled advancement flap design with a triangular extension at the base, which allows redistribution of a large surface area of the scalp. RESULTS All 21 patients achieved complete and viable soft tissue coverage of the recipient site, but 19.0% developed complications unrelated to flap viability, requiring reoperation (infected bone flap, epidural hematoma, and recurrent glioblastoma with subdural abscess). Only 1 patient required conversion to free flap reconstruction due to cerebrospinal fluid leak. Etiologies included cancer (76.1%), cerebrovascular disease (19.0%), and traumatic brain injury (4.8%). Preoperative radiation (42.9%), bone/hardware exposure (57.1%), and previous craniotomy (85.7%) were widely prevalent. Defect size ranged from 3 to 50 cm2 (mean, 16.9 cm2), and flap size ranged from 90 to 500 cm2 (mean, 222 cm2). CONCLUSION The visor flap provides an innovative solution for closure of scalp defects. This technique optimizes immediate closure of tissue compromised by infection or chemotherapy/radiation without burning bridges to more complex reconstructive options.


2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 1107-1110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sammy Othman ◽  
Saïd C. Azoury ◽  
Michael G. Tecce ◽  
Sameer Shakir ◽  
Arturo J. Rios-Diaz ◽  
...  


2008 ◽  
Vol 139 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. P125-P126
Author(s):  
Barrie Yau-Boon Tan ◽  
Mark Khoo

Objectives To study the use, complication rate, and efficacy of pedicled local regional flaps for head and neck reconstruction, and to compare these results with those of microvascular free flap reconstruction. Methods Retrospective analysis of all head and neck oncologic resections requiring flap reconstruction in a tertiary head and neck surgery centre over a 6-year period from 2001–2007. Results In total, 77 operations with flap reconstruction were performed. 44 resections employed pedicled locoregional flaps, comprising 33 pectoralis major, 3 trapezius, 3 cervical rotation, 1 deltopectoral, 1 temporalis muscle, 2 nasolabial, 1 cheek rotation, and 2 bilobed rotation flaps. 2 patients had a combination of 2 regional flaps. There was 1 flap failure. Minor complications occurred in 25% of patients comprising wound seromas (3), wound dehiscence (6), fibrotic band formation (1) and pharyngocutaneous fistula (1). 33 resections employed free flap microvascular reconstructions, comprising 22 free radial forearm, 7 free rectus abdominis, 1 free jejunal, 1 free fibular, and 2 anterolateral thigh flaps. There was 1 flap failure. Minor complications occurred in 33% of patients, comprising donor site wound dehiscence (4), recipient site wound dehiscence or seroma (4), plate extrusion (1), abscess and wound breakdown (2). Conclusions Despite the ready access to free flap reconstruction today, pedicled flaps, especially the pectoralis major flap, remain a major workhorse in head and neck reconstruction. They are hardy, reliable, cost-effective, and can be done in a short operative time. Moreover, for several regions, the functional outcome is no worse than free flap reconstruction.



2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominik Steiner ◽  
Raymund E. Horch ◽  
Ilker Eyüpoglu ◽  
Michael Buchfelder ◽  
Andreas Arkudas ◽  
...  


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1740
Author(s):  
Stefan Janik ◽  
Rachelle Eljazzar ◽  
Muhammad Faisal ◽  
Stefan Grasl ◽  
Erich Vyskocil ◽  
...  

The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the extent of tumor resection and free flap reconstruction influences functional outcome and complications in patients with solid malignancies of the cheek. Therefore, we retrospectively assessed recipient site complications and functional outcomes in 47 patients with solid malignancies of the cheek who underwent either partial (n = 30; 63.8%) or full-thickness (n = 17; 36.2%) cheek resection with free flap reconstruction. Complications occurred in 12 (70.6%) patients after full thickness resections with creation of through-and-through defects compared to 14 (70.6%) patients with partial defects (p = 0.138). Among those 26 patients (55.3%), major recipient site complications, like development of salivary fistula or free flap loss, were observed in 10 (21.3%) and 2 (4.3%) cases, respectively, while minor complications, like wound dehiscence and local infections, were found in 14 (29.8%) and 9 (19.1%) patients. Complications were noticed particularly after reconstruction of suborbital defects (69.2%; p = 0.268), of which occurrence of salivary fistulae was the most common (46.2%; p = 0.035). Similarly, functional outcomes including oral incompetence, ectropion, and trismus were not affected by the extent of resection (p = 0.766). However, oral incompetence was higher in patients with tumors originating from the oral cavity (p = 0.020) and after the performance of mandibulectomy (p = 0.003). Overall, there was no difference in functional outcome or recipient site morbidity between tumor resections resulting in full-thickness and partial defects.



Author(s):  
Daniel Hammer ◽  
Aurora G. Vincent ◽  
Fayette Williams ◽  
Yadranko Ducic

AbstractMidface reconstruction has been a consistent challenge for reconstructive surgeons even with the significant advances in technology and technique achieved over the recent years. A meticulous preoperative assessment of the patient is required to properly assess the defect or anticipated defect, determine proper reconstructive surgical plan, and discuss expected functional and aesthetic outcomes with the patient. For years we have employed local flaps, regional flaps, obturators, alloplastic implants, free flaps, or a combination of the previously mentioned techniques to address complex midface reconstruction. Free flap reconstruction in the midface requires special considerations for the pedicle, flap selection, and flap design to ensure an optimal outcome. The introduction of virtual surgical planning for reconstruction has enhanced patient outcomes to include advances in immediate dental rehabilitation at the time of free flap surgery. Postoperative considerations including quality of life, functional and aesthetic outcomes, and management of complications will also be discussed.



2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Györi ◽  
Anna Fast ◽  
Annika Resch ◽  
Thomas Rath ◽  
Christine Radtke

Summary Background Despite continuous surgical advances, reconstruction of complex lower extremity wounds remains challenging. The indication of local flaps or microsurgical free tissue transfer depends on the anatomical location and size of the defect, as well as the comorbidities and general condition of the patient. In this study, local and free flap reconstruction of distal lower extremity defects was assessed, and postoperative complications and limb salvage were analyzed. Methods A total of 34 patients were included in this retrospective study. Distal lower extremity defects were of traumatic (29%) and non-traumatic (71%) etiologies. Patient characteristics, flap selection, postoperative complications, and limb preservation within the first 12 months were assessed and compared by reconstructive treatment concept. Statistical analysis included parametric and non-parametric tests. The two-sided alpha was set at 5% for all statistical tests. Results While 21 patients were treated with local flaps, 13 patients underwent microsurgical free flap reconstruction. The most common comorbidities were peripheral vascular disease and diabetes. Local flaps included the gastrocnemius muscle flap, soleus flap, sural flap, and plantaris medialis flap. The most commonly used free flaps for soft tissue reconstruction were latissimus dorsi and gracilis muscle flaps. The overall lower extremity preservation rate was 94.1%. There was one case of below-knee amputation 1 month after free flap reconstruction, and one case of first-ray amputation of the foot after local flap coverage. Conclusion Reconstruction of lower extremity defects can be achieved by local or free flap reconstruction. Flap selection is influenced by anatomical location, defect size, and patient factors.



2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 558-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mofiyinfolu Sokoya ◽  
Arash Bahrami ◽  
Aurora Vincent ◽  
Sameep Kadakia ◽  
Jared Inman ◽  
...  


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramez Philips ◽  
Alexander Graf ◽  
Michael Topf ◽  
Howard Krein ◽  
Ryan Heffelfinger ◽  
...  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document