Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Approach for Far Lateral Lumbar Discectomy: 2-Dimensional Operative Video

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. E8-E8
Author(s):  
Osama Nezar Kashlan ◽  
Hyeun Sung Kim ◽  
Siri Sahib S Khalsa ◽  
Ravindra Singh ◽  
Zhang Yong ◽  
...  

Abstract The conventional surgical approach to far lateral lumbar disk herniations is a paraspinal Wiltse approach. During the Wiltse approach, it is sometimes necessary to resect some of the facet or pars interarticularis to achieve an adequate exposure. The endoscopic transforaminal route can be of benefit in far lateral disk herniations due to direct access to the epidural space through Kambin's triangle, without the need for any bony removal or nerve retraction. In this video, we describe a percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal approach for far lateral discectomy in a patient presenting with a left L4 radiculopathy due to a far lateral L4-5 disk herniation. We describe Kambin's triangle anatomy and its relevance to the transforaminal route. The steps of the procedure are then described: dissection of soft tissue and removal of free disk fragments on the inferior aspect of the foramen far from the compressed exiting nerve route above to decrease the risk of retraction injury, gentle maneuvering of endoscope superiorly with removal of further compressive disk fragments, exposure of the exiting nerve root superiorly after adequate decompression is achieved and removal of any remaining fragments in close proximity to the nerve, and finally evaluation of traversing nerve root for any compressive lesions. The presentation ends with postoperative imaging confirming decompression of the far lateral disk herniation.

Author(s):  
Chadi Tannoury ◽  
D. Greg Anderson ◽  
Alexander R. Vaccaro ◽  
Todd J. Albert

Author(s):  
Chadi Tannoury ◽  
D. Greg Anderson ◽  
Alexander R. Vaccaro ◽  
Todd J. Albert

1995 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 681
Author(s):  
Young Chul Kim ◽  
Young Sook Kim ◽  
Jae Hee Oh ◽  
Hyun Shim Koh ◽  
Seung Soo Yun ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ezgi Akar ◽  
Ahmet Öğrenci ◽  
Orkun Koban ◽  
Mesut Yılmaz ◽  
Sedat Dalbayrak

Abstract Introduction The aim of this study was to compare clinical results of bilateral decompression and laminotomy and contralateral laminotomy following discectomy from the same side in patients who have far lateral disk herniation and lumbar spinal stenosis at the same level. Materials and Methods Twenty-four patients with far lateral disk herniation have been divided into two groups: group 1 (n = 14), those who have been through bilateral canal decompression with far lateral discectomy and ipsilateral approach, and group 2 (n = 10), those who have been through far lateral discectomy and bilateral decompression with unilateral approach from contralateral side. Early postoperative, 1st month, and 12th month back and leg pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores of the patients have been retrospectively evaluated. Results There is no significant difference between 1st month back and leg pain VAS scores of the groups. But 12th month back and leg pain VAS scores of group 1 are significantly higher than 1st month VAS scores. Also, 12th month back and leg pain VAS scores of group 1 are significantly higher than group 1. In the scanning carried out when the complaints of eight patients in group 1 continued, pars interarticularis fracture has been observed on the side where the surgery has been performed (57.1%). Six of these eight patients have been through stabilization surgery (42.8%). Conclusion Long-term postoperative results are better in cases who have been performed bilateral decompression with unilateral approach from contralateral side with median incision following paramedian incision discectomy in patients with far lateral disk herniation and spinal stenosis.


2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822199112
Author(s):  
Maike H. J. Schepens ◽  
Miranda L. van Hooff ◽  
Judith A. van Erkelens ◽  
Ronald Bartels ◽  
Eric Hoebink ◽  
...  

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: There is only limited data on the outcome of primary surgery of lumbar disk herniation (LDH) in Dutch patients. The objective of this study is to describe undesirable outcomes after primary LDH. Methods: The National Claims Database (Vektis) was searched for primary LDH operations performed from July 2015 until June 2016, for reoperations within 18 months, prescription of opioids between 6 to 12 months and nerve root block within 1 year. A combined outcome measure was also made. Group comparisons were analyzed with the Student’s t-test. Results: Primary LDH surgery was performed in 6895 patients in 70 hospitals. Weighted mean of reoperations was 7.3%, nerve root block 6.7% and opioid use 15.6%. In total, 23.0% of patients had one or more undesirable outcomes after surgery. The 95% CI interval exceeded the 50% incidence line for 14 out of 26 hospitals with less than 50 surgical interventions per year. Although the data suggested a volume effect on undesired outcomes, the t-tests between hospitals with volume thresholds of 100, 150 and 200 interventions per year did not support this ( P values 0.078, 0.129, 0.114). Conclusion: This unique nationwide claims-based study provides insight into patient-relevant undesirable outcomes such as reoperation, nerve root block and opioid use after LDH surgery. About a quarter of the patients had a serious complication in the first follow up year that prompted further medical treatment. There is a wide variation in complication rates between hospitals with a trend that supports concentration of LDH care.


2019 ◽  
Vol 81 (01) ◽  
pp. 017-027
Author(s):  
Michael Bender ◽  
Carolin Gramsch ◽  
Lukas Herrmann ◽  
Seong Woong Kim ◽  
Eberhard Uhl ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Microsurgical diskectomy/sequestrectomy is the standard procedure for the surgical treatment of lumbar disk herniations. The transforaminal endoscopic sequestrectomy technique is a minimally invasive alternative with potential advantages such as minimal blood loss and tissue damage, as well as early mobilization of the patient. We report the implementation of this technique in a German university hospital setting. Methods One single surgeon performed transforaminal endoscopic sequestrectomy from February 2013 to July 2016 for lumbar disk herniation in 44 patients. Demographic as well as perioperative, clinical, and radiologic data were analyzed from electronic records. Furthermore, we investigated complications, intraoperative change of the procedure to microsurgery, and reoperations. The postoperative course was analyzed using the Macnab criteria, supplemented by a questionnaire for follow-up. Pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging volumetric analyses were performed to assess the radiologic efficacy of the technique. Results Our study population had a median age of 52 years. The median follow-up was 15 months, and the median length of hospital stay was 4 days. Median duration of surgery was 100 minutes with a median blood loss of 50 mL. Surgery was most commonly performed at the L4–L5 level (63%) and in caudally migrated disk herniations (44%). In six patients, surgery was performed for recurrent disk herniations. The procedure had to be changed to conventional microsurgery in four patients. We observed no major complications. Minor complications occurred in six patients, and in four patients a reoperation was performed. Furthermore, a significantly lower Oswestry Disability Index score (p = 0.03), a lower Short Form 8 Health Survey (SF-8) score (p = 0.001), a lower visual analog scale (VAS) lower back pain score (p = 0.03) and VAS leg pain score (p = 0.0008) at the 12-month follow-up were observed in comparison with the preoperative examination. In MRI volumetry, we detected a median postoperative volume reduction of the disk herniation of 57.1% (p = 0.02). Conclusions The transforaminal endoscopic sequestrectomy can be safely implemented in a university hospital setting in selected patients with primary and recurrent lumbar disk herniations, and it leads to good clinical and radiologic results. However, learning curve, caseload, and residents' microsurgical training requirements clearly affect the implementation process.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document