pars interarticularis
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

198
(FIVE YEARS 43)

H-INDEX

29
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (17) ◽  
pp. 3987
Author(s):  
Jong-Beom Park ◽  
Sung-Kyu Kim ◽  
Hyoung-Yeon Seo ◽  
Jong-Hyun Ko ◽  
Tae-Min Hong

Spine surgeons often confuse C2 pedicle fractures (PFs) with pars interarticularis fractures. In addition, little information is available about the characteristics and treatment strategies for C2 PFs. We sought to investigate the characteristics of C2 PFs and to propose an appropriate treatment strategy. A total of forty-nine patients with C2 PFs were included in this study. We divided these patients into unilateral and bilateral C2 PF groups. The incidence rates and characteristics of other associated C2 and C2-3 injuries, and other cervical injuries, were evaluated. In addition, treatment methods and outcomes were analyzed. Twenty-two patients had unilateral C2 PFs and twenty-seven patients had bilateral C2 PFs. Among the cases of unilateral C2 PFs, all patients had one or more other C2 fractures, and twenty patients (90.9%) had one or two C2 body fractures. Meanwhile, among the cases of bilateral C2 PF, all patients had two or more other C2 fractures and one or two C2 body fractures. In unilateral C2 PFs, three patients with C2-3 anterior slip or adjacent cervical spine (C1-3) injury underwent surgery and nineteen patients (86.4%) were treated with conservative methods. In bilateral C2 PFs, three patients with C2-3 anterior slip or SCI at C2-3 underwent surgery and twenty-four patients (88.9%) were treated with conservative methods. Our results showed that C2 PFs do not occur alone and are always accompanied by other associated C2 injuries. C2 PFs should, generally, be thought of as a more complex fracture type than hangman’s fracture or dens fracture. Despite the complex fracture characteristics, most C2 PFs can be managed with conservative treatment. However, surgical treatments should be considered if the C2 PFs are accompanied by the C2-3 anterior slip and adjacent cervical spine injury.


2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 322-324
Author(s):  
Patrick Graham

2021 ◽  
Vol 103-B (8) ◽  
pp. 1351-1357
Author(s):  
Joshua Sun ◽  
Avneesh Chhabra ◽  
Uma Thakur ◽  
Louis Vazquez ◽  
Yin Xi ◽  
...  

Aims Some patients presenting with hip pain and instability and underlying acetabular dysplasia (AD) do not experience resolution of symptoms after surgical management. Hip-spine syndrome is a possible underlying cause. We hypothesized that there is a higher frequency of radiological spine anomalies in patients with AD. We also assessed the relationship between radiological severity of AD and frequency of spine anomalies. Methods In a retrospective analysis of registry data, 122 hips in 122 patients who presented with hip pain and and a final diagnosis of AD were studied. Two observers analyzed hip and spine variables using standard radiographs to assess AD. The frequency of lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV), along with associated Castellvi grade, pars interarticularis defect, and spinal morphological measurements were recorded and correlated with radiological severity of AD. Results Out of 122 patients, 110 (90.2%) were female and 12 (9.8%) were male. We analyzed the radiographs of 122 hips (59 (48.4%) symptomatic left hips, and 63 (51.6%) symptomatic right hips). Average age at time of presentation was 34.2 years (SD 11.2). Frequency of LSTV was high (39% to 43%), compared to historic records from the general population, with Castellvi type 3b being the most common (60% to 63%). Patients with AD have increased L4 and L5 interpedicular distance compared to published values. Frequency of pars interarticularis defect was 4%. Intraclass correlation coefficient for hip and spine variables assessed ranged from good (0.60 to 0.75) to excellent (0.75 to 1.00). Severity of AD did not demonstrate significant correlation with frequency of radiological spine anomalies. Conclusion Patients with AD have increased frequency of spinal anomalies seen on standard hip radiographs. However, there exists no correlation between radiological severity of AD and frequency of spine anomalies. In managing AD patients, clinicians should also assess spinal anomalies that are easily found on standard hip radiographs. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(8):1351–1357.


2021 ◽  
Vol 53 (8S) ◽  
pp. 198-199
Author(s):  
Hannah J. Robison ◽  
Adrian J. Boltz ◽  
Sarah N. Morris ◽  
Christy L. Collins ◽  
Avinash Chandran

Author(s):  
C Hays ◽  
S Fehr ◽  
XC Liu ◽  
R Haddas

Spondylolysis is a stress fracture of the vertebral pars interarticularis that frequently affects adolescents involved in sports. Conservative bracing methods may assist the clinician in treating spondylolysis, though there is a need to further validate these techniques. The goal of this study was to evaluate differences in the 3D movements of the thoracic and lumbar spine before and after bracing. Five patients (mean age 14.4 ± 1.3 years) with spondylogenic back pain were evaluated for kinematic measurements using a Vicon motion capture system. Patients performed activities both with and without a lumbar corset brace including walking, kneeling, standing from a chair, standing from the floor, ascending and descending stairs, and lifting. Patients were evaluated for differences in thoracic and lumbar range of motion (ROM) in the braced and unbraced condition. While wearing the brace, patients demonstrated reduced extension ROM of the thoracic spine while walking (mean reduction = 0.4°), ascending stairs (3.0°), descending stairs (2.1°), lifting (14.8°), standing from a chair (4.1°), standing from the floor (16.7°), and kneeling (8.4°). Patients also exhibited reduced extension ROM of the total lumbar spine while ascending stairs (mean reduction = 1.8°), lifting (12.7°), standing from a chair (9.5°), standing from the floor (11.8°), and kneeling (4.7°). These results provide evidence that bracing reduces stress on the pars interarticularis and relieves symptoms in the athlete with spondylogenic back pain, thereby facilitating a return to sports.


2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822110088
Author(s):  
Daniel Chepurin ◽  
Uphar Chamoli ◽  
Ashish D. Diwan

Study Design: Translational review encompassing basic science and clinical evidence. Objectives: Multiple components of the lumbar spine interact during its normal and pathological function. Bony stress in the lumbar spine is recognized as a factor in the development of pars interarticularis defect and stress fractures, but its relationship with intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration is not well understood. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to examine the relationship between bony stress and IVD degeneration. Methods: Online databases Scopus, PubMed and MEDLINE via OVID were searched for relevant studies published between January 1980-February 2020, using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Two authors independently analyzed the data, noting characteristics and biases in various studies. Results: Thirty-two articles were included in the review: 8 clinical studies, 9 finite element modeling studies, 3 in-vivo biomechanical testing studies, and 12 in-vitro biomechanical testing studies. Of the 32 articles, 19 supported, 4 rejected and 9 made no conclusion on the hypothesis that there is a positive associative relationship between IVD degeneration and bony stress. However, sufficient evidence was not available to confirm or reject a causal relationship. Conclusions: Most studies suggest that the prevalence of IVD degeneration increases in the presence of bony stress; whether a causal relationship exists is unclear. The literature recommends early diagnosis and clinical suspicion of IVD degeneration and bony stress. Longitudinal studies are required to explore causal relationships between IVD degeneration and bony stress.


2021 ◽  
pp. 87-92
Author(s):  
V. P. Mironova ◽  
A. V. Sudarkina ◽  
A. P. Dergilev ◽  
N. A. Gorbunov ◽  
A. A. Kuzovkova

Cervical spondylolysis is a fairly rare clinical phenomenon that is mostly asymptomatic. The article describes a case of detection of bilateral cortical defects of pars interarticularis at the level of the CVI vertebra. Methods of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were used for a comprehensive assessment of morphological changes.


Author(s):  
Rahul Gautam Talukdar ◽  
Kiran Kumar Mukhopadhyay ◽  
Santanu Dhara ◽  
Sanjay Gupta

The objective of this study was to develop an improved finite element (FE) model of a lumbar functional spinal unit (FSU) and to subsequently analyse the deviations in load transfer owing to implantation. The effects of loading and boundary conditions on load transfer in intact and implanted FSUs and its relationship with the potential risk of vertebral fracture were investigated. The FE models of L1-L5 and L3-L4 FSUs, intact and implanted, were developed using patient-specific CT-scan dataset and segmentation of cortical and cancellous bone regions. The effect of submodelling technique, as compared to artificial boundary conditions, on the elastic behaviour of lumbar spine was examined. Applied forces and moments, corresponding to physiologic movements, were used as loading conditions. Results indicated that the loading and boundary conditions considerably affect stress-strain distributions within a FSU. This study, based on an improved FE model of a vertebra, highlights the importance of using the submodelling technique to adequately evaluate the mechanical behaviour of a FSU. In the intact FSU, strains of 200–400 µε were observed in the cancellous bone of vertebral body and pedicles. High equivalent stresses of 10–25 MPa and 1–5 MPa were generated around the pars interarticularis for cortical and cancellous regions, respectively. Implantation caused reductions of 85%–92% in the range of motion for all movements. Insertion of the intervertebral cage resulted in major deviations in load transfer across a FSU for all movements. The cancellous bone around cage experienced pronounced increase in stresses of 10–15 MPa, which indicated potential risk of failure initiation in the vertebra.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document