The Meaning of Modal Discourse

2020 ◽  
pp. 77-91
Author(s):  
Amie L. Thomasson

The goal of this chapter is to make it clear how the modal normativist account can avoid the notorious “Frege-Geach” or “embedding” problem that has long threatened non-descriptive views of all kinds. While Chapter 2 identifies an alternative function for modal discourse, we cannot take this to be a matter of identifying the meaning of modal terms. For modal claims may be embedded in conditionals, negations, etc., in which case they are not serving their characteristic function, and yet must be thought to have the same meaning. To meet this problem, this chapter gives the meaning of modal terms in terms of their inferential role—which is constant even in embedded contexts—and shows how this meaning is related to the function of modal terms. The chapter also aims to show how the modal normativist account can avoid the classic objections to modal conventionalism.

Author(s):  
Jonathan Ben-Artzi ◽  
Marco Marletta ◽  
Frank Rösler

AbstractThe question of whether there exists an approximation procedure to compute the resonances of any Helmholtz resonator, regardless of its particular shape, is addressed. A positive answer is given, and it is shown that all that one has to assume is that the resonator chamber is bounded and that its boundary is $${{\mathcal {C}}}^2$$ C 2 . The proof is constructive, providing a universal algorithm which only needs to access the values of the characteristic function of the chamber at any requested point.


1991 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 593-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. U. Bräker ◽  
J. Hüsler

We deal with the distribution of the first zero Rn of the real part of the empirical characteristic process related to a random variable X. Depending on the behaviour of the theoretical real part of the underlying characteristic function, cases with a slow exponential decrease to zero are considered. We derive the limit distribution of Rn in this case, which clarifies some recent results on Rn in relation to the behaviour of the characteristic function.


Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 1440
Author(s):  
Yiran Yuan ◽  
Chenglin Wen ◽  
Yiting Qiu ◽  
Xiaohui Sun

There are three state estimation fusion methods for a class of strong nonlinear measurement systems, based on the characteristic function filter, namely the centralized filter, parallel filter, and sequential filter. Under ideal communication conditions, the centralized filter can obtain the best state estimation accuracy, and the parallel filter can simplify centralized calculation complexity and improve feasibility; in addition, the performance of the sequential filter is very close to that of the centralized filter and far better than that of the parallel filter. However, the sequential filter can tolerate non-ideal conditions, such as delay and packet loss, and the first two filters cannot operate normally online for delay and will be invalid for packet loss. The performance of the three designed fusion filters is illustrated by three typical cases, which are all better than that of the most popular Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) performance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document