Pathogenesis, Epidemiology, and Natural Course of Retinal Detachment

Author(s):  
Daniel A. Brinton ◽  
Charles P. Wilkinson

Retinal detachment does not result from a single, specific disease; rather, numerous disease processes can result in the presence of subretinal fluid. The three general categories of retinal detachments are termed rhegmatogenous, exudative, and tractional. Rhegmatogenous detachments are sometimes referred to as primary detachments, while both exudative and tractional detachments are called secondary or nonrhegmatogenous detachments. The three types of retinal detachments are not mutually exclusive. For example, detachments associated with proliferative vitreoretinopathy or proliferative diabetic retinopathy may exhibit both rhegmatogenous and tractional features. However, excluding the section on differential diagnosis in Chapter 5, the scope of this book is limited to rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. Accordingly, throughout the book, the term retinal detachment refers to the rhegmatogenous type, unless another type is specifically mentioned. Rhegmatogenous detachments (from the Greek rhegma, meaning rent, rupture, or fissure) are the most common form of retinal detachment. They are caused by a break in the retina through which fluid passes from the vitreous cavity into the subretinal space. The responsible break(s) can be identified preoperatively in more than 90% of cases, but occasionally the presence of a minute, unseen break must be assumed. Exudative detachments, also called serous detachments, are due to an associated problem that produces subretinal fluid without a retinal break. This underlying problem usually involves the choroid as a tumor or an inflammatory disorder. Tractional detachments occur when pathologic vitreoretinal adhesions or membranes mechanically pull the retina away from the pigment epithelium without a retinal break. The most common causes include proliferative diabetic retinopathy, cicatricial retinopathy of prematurity, proliferative sickle retinopathy, and penetrating trauma. Retinal breaks may subsequently develop, resulting in a combined tractional and rhegmatogenous detachment. The essential requirements for a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment include a retinal break and low-viscosity vitreous liquids capable of passing through the break into the subretinal space. Vitreous changes usually precede development of important defects in the retina. The usual pathologic sequence causing retinal detachment is vitreous liquefaction followed by a posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) that causes traction at the site of significant vitreoretinal adhesion with a subsequent retinal tear. Fluids from the vitreous cavity then pass through the tear into the subretinal space (Figure 2–1), augmented by currents within the vitreous cavity caused by rotary eye movements. Although a total PVD is usually seen, many detachments occur with partial vitreous detachment, and evidence of posterior vitreous detachment may not be seen.

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 15-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryuichiro Ono ◽  
Akihiro Kakehashi ◽  
Hiroko Yamagami ◽  
Norito Sugi ◽  
Nozomi Kinoshita ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Daniel A. Brinton ◽  
Charles P. Wilkinson

The evolution of the retinal reattachment operation is one of the most remarkable chapters in the history of ophthalmology. Gonin’s operation for repair of the detached retina ranks with Daviel’s cataract extraction, von Graefe’s peripheral iridectomy, and Machemer’s vitrectomy as one of history’s most important surgical treatments for blinding eye diseases. The entity of retinal detachment was recognized early in the eighteenth century by de Saint-Yves, who reported the gross pathologic examination of an eye with a detached retina. The first clinical description did not appear until almost a century later, in 1817, when Beer detected a retinal detachment without the benefit of an ophthalmoscope. Von Helmholtz’s invention of the direct ophthalmoscope in 1851 was a giant step forward in diagnostic technique, and a rapid succession of ophthalmoscopic observations of retinal detachments soon followed. In the same year, Coccius reported the ophthalmoscopic detection of breaks in the detached retina. Von Graefe theorized in 1858 that retinal detachment was caused by a serous effusion from the choroid into the subretinal space. When he observed a retinal break, he assumed that it was secondary to the detachment and represented the eye’s attempt to cure itself. Supposing that the development of a break would allow the subretinal fluid to pass from the subretinal space into the vitreous cavity, he attempted unsuccessfully to treat detachments with deliberate incision of the retina. Girard-Teulon invented the reflecting binocular indirect ophthalmoscope in 1861. This potentially important contribution was generally overlooked by the profession, and more than 80 years transpired before Schepens developed the selfilluminating binocular indirect ophthalmoscope. In 1869 Iwanoff described the entity of posterior vitreous detachment, which is now recognized as a prerequisite to the development of most retinal detachments. The following year de Wecker suggested that retinal breaks cause detachment due to the resultant passage of vitreous fluid through the break into the subretinal space. Unfortunately, his accurate interpretation was not generally accepted. In 1882 Leber reported his observation of retinal breaks in 14 of 27 retinal detachments, and he correctly inferred the role of vitreous traction in the pathogenesis of breaks. Unfortunately, he later altered this opinion.


Author(s):  
V.Y. Markevich ◽  
◽  
T.A. Imshenetskaya ◽  
O.A. Yarmak ◽  
◽  
...  

Purpose. To study the effectiveness of extrascleral filling (ESF) using endoillumination in the surgical treatment of patients with primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Material and methods. The material for the study was the data of a comprehensive clinical examination and surgical treatment by ESF method using endoillumination in 17 patients (17 eyes) with RRD. In 7 cases (41%), the macular area was involved in the detachment process. In 5 cases (29.4%), local scleral filling was performed. In the remaining 12 cases (70.6%), the local ESF was supplemented with a circling silicone element. Surgical intervention was supplemented by transscleral drainage of subretinal fluid (SRF) in 10 cases (59%) and pneumatic retinopexy with SF6 gas 50% in 8 cases (48%). Results. In the general group of patients, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) increased from 0.35 to 0.46. In the subgroup of patients with a detached macular area, the positive dynamics is more pronounced, BCVA increased from 0.1 to 0.28. The progression of proliferative vitreoretinopathy caused the recurrence of retinal detachment in two patients (11.8%). Recurrences were diagnosed after 3 and 5 months, respectively. In both cases, a vitrectomy with tamponade of the vitreous cavity with silicone oil 5000 Cst was performed. The percentage of successful anatomical outcome after the first operation in our study was 82%. The percentage of successful achievement of the final anatomical result was 94%. In two cases, additional injection of SF6 gas into the vitreous cavity was required. Conclusion. This type of surgical treatment is an effective method of surgical treatment of patients with RRD. In our study, the successful anatomical outcome after the first operation was recorded in 82% of patients, which correlates with the data of the authors who also used this method (83–92%). Surgeons who performed surgical treatment using this technique in our study note improved workplace ergonomics when visualizing the fundus using an operating microscope and endoillumination compared with indirect ophthalmoscopy. Other teams of authors came to this conclusion as well. In our study, there were no complications associated with the introduction of a light pipe into the vitreous cavity (iatrogenic crystalline lens injury, endophthalmitis), which indicates the safety of this type of surgical treatment.


2021 ◽  
pp. 112067212199268
Author(s):  
Jorge Fernández-Engroba ◽  
Muhsen Saman ◽  
Jeroni Nadal

Purpose: To report our anatomical outcome with the internal limiting membrane (ILM) graft procedure in the management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) secondary to optic disc coloboma (ODC). Methods: Description of a new surgical procedure in one eye of one patient who underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined with ILM graft technique. Subsequent follow-up included optical coherence tomography (OCT) and visual acuity. Results: After only 1 week, the OCT revealed the ILM graft plugging the retinal tear with complete resorption of subretinal fluid. The sealing effect of this graft persisted after 6 months. However, visual outcome was poor and corrected distance visual acuity was 20/200 as a result of the previous long-standing retinal detachment with loss of photoreceptors. Conclusion: We suggest that ILM graft could be performed as a first line treatment in the management of RRD secondary to ODC. This direct closure of the retinal tears, allows a quick and effective interruption of the communication between the subretinal space and the vitreous cavity. Detecting these retinal tears and applying this technique as soon as possible could achieve not only an earlier anatomical success but obtain good visual results in retinal tears with RRD secondary to ODC. Further studies will be necessary to provide more evidences


Author(s):  
Daniel A. Brinton ◽  
Charles P. Wilkinson

Evaluation of a patient for retinal detachment includes a thorough history and a complete ocular exam, including measurement of visual acuity, external examination, ocular motility testing, testing of pupillary reactions, anterior-segment biomicroscopy, tonometry, and binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy with scleral depression. Posterior-segment biomicroscopy, perimetry, and ultrasonography are also sometimes required. Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment is a diagnosis generally made by clinical examination of the retina alone, but a full history, ocular examination, and sometimes selected ancillary tests are also important parts of the evaluation (Figure 4–1). The symptoms of retinal detachment include fl ashes of light, new floaters, visual Field defect, decreased visual acuity, metamorphopsia, and rarely, defective color vision. The perception of light fl ashes, or photopsia, is due to the production of phosphenes by pathophysiologic stimulation of the retina. The retina is activated by light but is also capable of responding to mechanical disturbances. In fact, the most common cause of light fl ashes is posterior vitreous detachment. As the vitreous separates from the retinal surface, the retina is disturbed mechanically, stimulating a sensation of light. This perception is more marked if there are focal vitreoretinal adhesions. Generally, vitreous separation is benign and may almost be regarded as normal in the senescent eye. In approximately 12% of symptomatic posterior vitreous detachments, however, a careful search of the periphery reveals a tear of the retina. If the fl ashes are associated with floaters, it is wise to assume that a retinal tear exists, until proved otherwise. These symptoms demand a prompt and careful examination of the periphery with binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy and scleral indentation. The patient’s localization of the photopsia is of little value in predicting the location of the vitreoretinal pathology. If no breaks are evident in the first examination after symptomatic vitreous detachment, they rarely appear at a later date. If there is no associated hemorrhage or other pathologic condition, the patient needs counseling only. However, if pigment or blood is detected in the vitreous, a follow-up examination is often required. It is prudent to forewarn patients about the symptoms of retinal detachment. Flashes alone or floaters alone are less significant than if they occur together, in which case they are more likely to be associated with a retinal break.


2009 ◽  
Vol 50 (8) ◽  
pp. 3607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karunakaran Coral ◽  
Narayanasamy Angayarkanni ◽  
Narayanan Gomathy ◽  
Muthuvel Bharathselvi ◽  
Rishi Pukhraj ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document