Infrastructure Investment in Europe

Author(s):  
Philipp-Bastian Brutscher ◽  
Debora Revoltella

Using new estimates of infrastructure investment in Europe, this chapter documents a sharp fall in infrastructure investment activities in recent years, with government investment and investments targeted at transport infrastructure being most affected. The chapter discusses a broad range of reasons for the poor investment performance, including budget consolidation efforts—in particular, at the sub-sovereign level—low commercial returns to investment and, in certain market segments, access to finance constraints. The chapter concludes with a description of the role of the European Investment Bank in stimulating more infrastructure investment through its financing activities, its technical advisory assistance, and its input to regulatory and structural reform in Europe.

IG ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 328-335
Author(s):  
Hartmut Marhold

The European Union (EU) invests huge resources in overcoming the pandemic crisis and does so as a learning system: The Union learned lessons from the previous, the financial, economic and state debt crisis after 2008, in many ways. The EU assumes now definitely the role of an active player in the economy, leaving behind the neoliberal doctrine; she suspends the restrictive budgetary policy, which prevented already in 2008 and the following years adequate solutions; she reshaped the control over its financial aid programmes so that harsh conflict between member states („troika“) are mitigated; the Union further refined the public private partnership mechanisms established unter the aegis of the European Investment Bank (EIB); the European Central Bank (ECB) assumes now a role still disputed after 2008; the flexibility clauses of the Lisbon Treaty, just put into force after 2008, are now extensively applied; and, more than anything else, the Union aims at a change of paradigm by putting the NextGenerationEU programme at the service of sustainable development (enshrined in the Green Deal).


1995 ◽  
Vol 32 (11) ◽  
pp. 97-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. D. R. Bond

The role of the European Investment Bank (EIB) in financing viable long-term investments and their geographical and sectorial spread are briefly described. Its activities in the Mediterranean environmental field and the special actions taken jointly with the World Bank including structured technical assistance for project preparation are explained. Recent experience of the EIB in the wastewater sector covering the importance of the planning and institutional contexts as well as an analysis of typical problems and risks during implementation and operation are given.


Author(s):  
Rocco Luigi Bubbico ◽  
Philipp-Bastian Brutscher ◽  
Debora Revoltella

The first part sets the stage, providing trends on public investment in France, Germany, Italy and Spain. It is preceded by an initial chapter by Rocco Luigi Bubbico, Philipp-Bastian Brutscher and Debora Revoltella from the European Investment Bank (EIB) outlining the experience of Europe as a whole. The picture is as follows: between 2008 and 2016 public investment in the EU declined from 3.4% of GDP to 2.7%. Despite a slight rebound in 2017 and 2018, public investment still stands at only 2.9% of GDP, 15% below its pre-crisis levels. Fiscal consolidation pressure was at the core of such decline in public investment especially in countries that experienced a strong pressure to tighten their budgets. The negative effect of fiscal consolidation was in many cases amplified by a re-prioritization of public outlays away from investment towards current expenditures. Infrastructure investment was disproportionately affected by the decline in public investment. EIB estimates show that overall infrastructure investment declined by about 25% between 2008 and 2016, with the government sector accounting for the lion’s share of this fall. From a sectorial perspective, investment in transport and education infrastructure experienced the strongest decline. The chapter clearly documents that the fall in government infrastructure investment does not reflect a saturation effect, the annual infrastructure investment gap is estimated to be about €155 bn and that construction of new infrastructure seems to continue to produce large positive economic spillover effects. This chapter advises, as a policy lesson, sound project selection: preparation and implementation are the keys to reversing the negative trend in investment activities in the EU, besides overcoming funding constraints. Obviously, to ensure the efficient use of available funds, sound infrastructure governance is also a key factor.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document