Demetrius and Phila

2020 ◽  
pp. 27-36
Author(s):  
Pat Wheatley ◽  
Charlotte Dunn

The death of Alexander the Great brings a great deal of political upheaval to the empire, and Alexander’s generals are quick to react. After being threatened by Perdiccas, Antigonus Monophthalmus fled from Phrygia, and eventually forged an alliance with Antipater at the settlement of Triparadeisus in 321 or 320 BC. He cemented it by marrying the 15-year-old Demetrius to Antipater’s daughter Phila, who was aged around 35. She was the mother to Demetrius’ heir, Antigonus Gonatas. This unusual relationship was of great importance to Demetrius and the Antigonid family, and lasted until her suicide in 288. Their age difference caused much comment in the ancient world.

1980 ◽  
Vol 70 ◽  
pp. 28-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. R. F. Price

Because men addressed him as Augustus in view of his claim to honour they revere him with temples and sacrifices over all the islands and continents, in cities and tribes requiting him for the magnitude of his virtue and his benefactions towards them.This passage from a biography of Augustus by a contemporary writer, Nicolaus of Damascus, gives a rare picture of the way in which the emperor was honoured in his lifetime throughout the provinces of the empire. The temples and sacrifices to which it refers formed part of a nexus of cultic honours, classified by the Greeks as isotheoi timai, honours equivalent to those given to the gods, which also included priests, festivals and games. This form of royal ritual stretched back in the Greek lands three hundred years to the time of Alexander the Great and beyond and constitutes a fundamental aspect of the relationship between subject and ruler in the ancient world.


Author(s):  
Pat Wheatley ◽  
Charlotte Dunn

Demetrius the Besieger is a historical and historiographical biography of Demetrius Poliorcetes ‘The Besieger of Cities’ (336–282 BC), an outstanding, yet enigmatic figure who presided over the disintegration of Alexander the Great’s empire after 323 BC. His campaigns, initiatives, and personal life bestride the opening forty years of the so-called ‘Hellenistic’ age, and are pivotal in its formation. Son of Antigonus Monophthalmus ‘The One-Eyed’, who fought alongside Alexander, Demetrius is the most fascinating and high profile of the Diadochoi, or Successors to Alexander the Great, and he became the first of the Hellenistic kings. This work provides a detailed account of Demetrius’ life set in the historical context of the chaotic period following Alexander’s unexpected death. It examines his career as a general, a king, and a legendary womanizer, presenting both the triumphs and disasters experienced by this remarkable individual. Demetrius was especially famous for his spectacular siege operations against enemy cities, and gained his unique nickname from his innovation in building gigantic siege engines, which were engineering wonders of the ancient world. However, his life was a paradox, with his fortunes oscillating wildly between successful and catastrophic ventures. His intrinsic qualities were hotly debated by the ancients, and remain controversial to this day. What is indisputable is that his endeavours dominated a formative period marked by great flux and enormous change, and his dazzling persona supplies a lens through which we can understand Hellenistic history.


2019 ◽  
pp. 1-28
Author(s):  
David C. Yates

The Introduction situates the thesis within current scholarship and explores its broader implications, particularly with regard to Herodotus, panhellenism, and the influence of Philip and Alexander the Great on the later Persian-War tradition. Yates also provides a brief introduction to memory theory through a review of five key concepts: the definition of collective memory, the relationship between power and memory, the nature of memorial communities, memory as narrative, and the transmission of memory over time. This review is not exhaustive, however, and is intended merely as a primer for concepts that appear throughout the book. The Introduction then turns to a discussion of the methodological challenges of applying memory theory to the ancient world and ends with an outline of the chapters.


Classics ◽  
2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Verde

The term “Epicureanism” means the philosophy of Epicurus (b. Samos c. 342–341 bce, d. Athens c. 271–270 bce) and the school founded by him. Epicurus was one of the most famous Greek philosophers of the Hellenistic period (which traditionally dates from the death of Alexander the Great [323 bce] to the Battle of Actium [31 bce]) and its influence on the history of Western philosophy is certainly decisive. Epicurus’s philosophy is organized into a coherent system, with parts that follow an unchangeable order oriented toward ethics; i.e., the end and the culmination to which philosophy aims: (1) canonic (i.e., the epistemological part of the system, which contains the criteria of truth based on the veracity of sensations); (2) physiology (i.e., the science of nature, which explains everything on the ground of atoms and void); (3) ethics (which promises the attainment of happiness through pleasure, which is the complete absence of pain). Although most of Epicurus’s works have been lost, a crucial source to rebuild his philosophy is Diogenes Laertius’s Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers, Book 10, that preserved the “Testament” (§§ 16–21); the three doctrinal letters addressed to Herodotus (§§ 35–83, about the science of nature), to Pythocles (§§ 84–116, about celestial and meteorological phenomena), and to Menoeceus (§§ 121–135, about ethics); and forty “Principal Doctrines” (§§ 139–154, essentially about morals). A Vatican Library manuscript (Vat gr. 1950) also preserved eighty-one maxims (some are identical to Principal Doctrines; others are attributable to the Epicurean Metrodorus of Lampsacus): it is the so-called Gnomologium Vaticanum Epicureum (Vatican Sayings). The masterpiece of Epicurus devoted to the science of nature is Peri physeos (On Nature) in thirty-seven books, only a few fragmentary papyri of these have been found in the Villa dei Papiri in Herculaneum (Italy). Beyond the works by several Epicureans (such as Philodemus of Gadara) found in Herculaneum, Lucretius’s De rerum natura (Of the Nature of Things) and the monumental inscription on stone by Diogenes of Oinoanda (in Lycia) dated around 120 ce are very significant Epicurean sources. After establishing some “philosophical circles” in Mytilene and Lampsacus, Epicurus founded his main philosophical school, the “Garden” (Kepos), in Athens (307–304 bce). Many scholarchs succeeded Epicurus at the helm of the Garden, from Hermarchus of Mytilene (scholarch after Epicurus until about 250 bce) to Patron (before 50 bce); however, no clear information is available after that on the succession of Kepos leaders. Epicureanism was one of the most enduring philosophical schools of the ancient world. Up to the Imperial Age, it is possible to ascertain that Epicureanism was still active; it is well known, indeed, that one of the Imperial chairs created by Marcus Aurelius (176 ce) was of Epicurean philosophy.


1988 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 382-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. G. L. Hammond

Two recently published inscriptions afford new insights into this subject. They were published separately and independently within a year or two of one another. Much is now to be gained by considering them together. The first inscription, found at Philippi in 1936, published by C. Vatin in Proc. 8th Epigr. Conf. (Athens, 1984), 259–70, and published with a fuller commentary by L. Missitzis in The Ancient World 12 (1985), 3–14, records the decision by Alexander the Great on the use of lands given by his father, Philip II, and in some cases confirmed by himself. The second inscription, found at the site of ancient Kalindoia (Toumpes Kalamotou) in 1982, was published with exemplary speed and an excellent commentary by I. P. Vokotopoulou in Ancient Macedonia 4 (Thessaloniki, 1986), 87–114. It records the names of the priests of Asclepius on a stele dedicated to Apollo; and in the preamble it mentions the name of Alexander, being Alexander the Great. Philippi and Kalindoia were both within the limits of the kingdom of Philip and Alexander (Str. 7 fr. 35).


Afghanistan ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-173
Author(s):  
Sara Peterson

Among the six excavated burials at Tillya-tepe, in northern Afghanistan, was one occupied by an elite woman wearing a substantial necklace consisting of large gold beads shaped as seed-heads. The scale and fine workmanship of this necklace suggest that it was one of her most important possessions. It can be demonstrated that these large seed-heads are representations of poppy capsules, whose significance lies in the fact that they are the source of the potent drug opium. This necklace is the most outstanding object within a group of items decorated with poppy imagery, all of which were discovered in female burials. The opium poppy has long been a culturally important plant, and the implication of this identification is investigated in several contexts. Firstly, the proliferation of poppy imagery in the female burials at Tillya-tepe is examined, and then there is a discussion of material evidence for opium among relevant peoples along the Eurasian steppes. The particular cultural importance of opium is reviewed, leading finally to a proposal for the societal role of these women.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document