Popular Capitalism? Privatization and Demutualization in the 1980s and 1990s

2021 ◽  
pp. 190-219
Author(s):  
Kieran Heinemann

While Margaret Thatcher publicly promoted a Puritan emphasis on thrift, hard work, and asceticism, the outcome of her policies stood in stark contrast to this side of her rhetoric. Her way of selling off nationalized industries allowed the British to have a heavily subsidized flutter on the stock market and increased the shareholder population to ten million investors. Reality, however, was a far cry from Thatcher’s slogan of a ‘share-owning democracy’, not least because the continued growth of large financial institutions meant that small shareholders had very little influence on corporate governance. Millions of people merely ‘stagged’ the privatization issues, meaning that they sold for a quick and easy profit in early trading. ‘Investors’ new and old applied the same short-term logic during the demutualization of major building societies like Halifax or Northern Rock during the 1990s, when ‘carpet-bagging’ became a national sport. Carpetbaggers opened accounts in societies ripe for demutualization not in order to save for a house, but to make a quick profit from selling their accounts once they were converted into shares due to the building society becoming a public company. This chapter places centre stage prominent carpetbaggers such as the former royal butler, Michael Hardern, who during the late 1990s campaigned to become a board member of all remaining building societies. The extent of ‘stagging’ and ‘carpet-bagging’ shows that popular capitalism was less an economic enfranchisement of the nation, and more an expressive culture of self-referential speculation, personal enrichment, and stock market gambling.

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yudho Taruno Muryanto ◽  
Anisa Dwi Wulandari

<p align="center"><strong><em>Abstract</em></strong><em></em></p><p align="center"><em>Developments in the field of capital markets encourage the emergence of </em><em>various</em><em> corporate actions to obtain benefits such as a public company. One of the emerging corporate actions </em><em>which have been done is</em><em> Backdoor Listing. Regulations in the capital market is generally allow</em><em>ed</em><em> backdoor listing. </em><em>B</em><em>ackdoor</em><em> L</em><em>isting</em><em> p</em><em>rocedure are often executed in Indonesia are as follows: (1) The acquisition of control of a public</em><em> </em><em>company by </em><em>private </em><em>company through the rights issue</em><em> (2) </em><em>the acquisition of </em><em>private</em><em> company </em><em>by </em><em>an </em><em>public</em><em> company that has an affiliate relationship with the </em><em>private</em><em> company into standby purchaser/ new controllers</em><em>. Study fulfillment of the Good Corporate Governance</em><em> </em><em>principles in the backdoor listing procedure is known that this procedure is still not met the Principles of Transparency, Accountability</em><em>, </em><em>as well as fairness and equity. It is need</em><em>ed</em><em> to establish </em><em>the </em><em>rules of providing transparency obligation to assess the feasibility of a new public company controller.</em><em></em></p><p>Keywords: <em>Good Corporate Governance, Stock Market, Backdoor Listing</em></p>


Author(s):  
Brian R. Cheffins

Chapter 5 deals with the 1990s, a decade when changing market conditions dramatically affected perceptions of public companies and the executives in charge. Pessimism prevalent as the 1990s got underway would dissipate in a few years with the American economy and the stock market both thriving. Public company executives ended the decade riding high in a manner that was unmatched throughout the post–World War II era. Concomitantly, confidence in the efficacy of internal and external constraints affecting public company management grew substantially. Optimism about corporate governance would quickly dissipate, however, when public companies suffered a sharp reversal of fortunes as the 2000s got underway.


2017 ◽  
Vol 96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yudho Taruno Muryanto, . . ◽  
Anisa Dwi Wulandari . .

Developments in the field of capital markets encourage the emergence of various corporate actions to obtain benefits such as a public company. One of the emerging corporate actions which have been done is Backdoor Listing. Regulations in the capital market is generally allowed backdoor listing. Backdoor Listing procedure are often executed in Indonesia are as follows: (1) The acquisition of control of a public company by private company through the rights issue (2) the acquisition of private company by an public company that has an affiliate relationship with the private company into standby purchaser/ new controllers. Study fulfillment of the Good Corporate Governance principles in the backdoor listing procedure is known that this procedure is still not met the Principles of Transparency, Accountability, as well as fairness and equity. It is needed to establish the rules of providing transparency obligation to assess the feasibility of a new public company controller.<br /><br />Keywords: Good Corporate Governance, Stock Market, Backdoor Listing


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond Siu Yeung Chan ◽  
See Tin Tang ◽  
Roy F. Ying ◽  
Sun Wing Tam

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erick Rading Outa ◽  
Nelson Maina Waweru ◽  
Peterson K Ozili

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1344-1361
Author(s):  
Isaiah Oino

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of transparency and disclosure on the financial performance of financial institutions. The emphasis is on assessing transparency and disclosure; auditing and compliance; risk management as indicators of corporate governance; and understanding how these parameters affect bank profitability, liquidity and the quality of loan portfolios. Design/methodology/approach A sample of 20 financial institutions was selected, with ten respondents from each, yielding a total sample size of 200. Principal component analysis (PCA), with inbuilt ability to check for composite reliability, was used to obtain composite indices for the corporate governance indicators as well as the indicators of financial performance, based on a set of questions framed for each institution. Findings The analysis demonstrates that greater disclosure and transparency, improved auditing and compliance and better risk management positively affect the financial performance of financial institutions. In terms of significance, the results show that as the level of disclosure and transparency in managerial affairs increases, the performance of financial institutions – as measured in terms of the quality of loan portfolios, liquidity and profitability – increases by 0.3046, with the effect being statistically significant at the 1 per cent level. Furthermore, as the level of auditing and the degree of compliance with banking regulations increases, the financial performance of banks improves by 0.3309. Research limitations/implications This paper did not consider time series because corporate governance does not change periodically. Practical implications This paper demonstrates the importance of disclosure and transparency in managerial affairs because the performance of financial institutions, as measured in terms of loan portfolios, liquidity and profitability, increases by 0.4 when transparency and disclosure improve, with this effect being statistically significant at the 1 per cent level. Originality/value The use of primary data in assessing the impact of corporate governance on financial performance, instead of secondary data, is the primary novelty of this study. Moreover, PCA is used to assess the weight of the various parameters.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document