Health Systems Research Ethics: Public Health Perspectives

Author(s):  
Bridget Pratt ◽  
Adnan A. Hyder

This chapter focuses on the ethics of health systems research. It first explores the extent to which traditional bioethics principles—respect for persons, beneficence, and justice—are relevant to this growing field. It then demonstrates that, while these principles are pertinent to health systems research, they can be interpreted and applied differently relative to biomedical research. Upholding justice, for example, entails ensuring that projects not only fairly distribute benefits and burdens, but also specifically contribute to advancing global health justice. The chapter then argues that health systems research may further require the application of additional core ethical commitments to consider the full range of ethical issues arising in the field. Ethical commitments to public engagement, collaboration, and sustainability, which have been identified as core commitments of the field of health systems ethics, are suggested as necessary for responsible ethical oversight of health systems research. While the ethical issues discussed are globally relevant, the chapter assumes a deliberate (though not exclusive) focus on low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bridget Pratt ◽  
Adnan A. Hyder

An ethical framework called “research for health justice” provides initial guidance on how to link health systems research in low- and middle-income countries to health equity. To further develop the largely conceptual framework, we tested its guidance against the experience of the Maternal and Neonatal Implementation for Equitable Health Systems (Manifest) project, which was performed in rural Uganda by researchers from Makerere University. We conducted 21 in-depth interviews with investigators and research implementers, directly observed study sites, and reviewed study-related documents. Our analysis identifies where alignment exists between the framework’s guidance and the Manifest project, providing initial lessons on how that was achieved. It also identifies where nonalignment occurred and gaps in the framework’s guidance. Suggestions are then made for revising and expanding “research for health justice.”


2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 1008-1022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adnan A. Hyder ◽  
Bridget Pratt ◽  
Joseph Ali ◽  
Nancy Kass ◽  
Nelson Sewankambo

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 28-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adnan A. Hyder ◽  
Abbas Rattani ◽  
Carleigh Krubiner ◽  
Abdulgafoor M. Bachani ◽  
Nhan T. Tran

Author(s):  
Maria W. Merritt ◽  
Adnan A. Hyder

This chapter relates public health ethics to selected questions regarding health systems ethics and provides overviews of chapters in the section of The Oxford Handbook of Public Health Ethics dedicated to health systems. National and subnational health systems aim chiefly to improve population health. Public health is a collective good whose promotion takes government action, raising ethical issues in stewardship, governance, and accountability. Moral justifications for public health activities, including overall benefit, collective efficiency, distributive fairness, and harm prevention, are considered by way of examining global human resources for health, with an eye to efficiency, equity, rights, and other ethical issues. Worldwide interest in health systems strengthening has boosted investment in health systems research, taking traditional research ethics to the population level in the field of health systems research ethics. The idea of a learning health care system (LHCS) represents a dynamic interface where health care delivery can be continuously improved through systemic data collection undertaken in conjunction with clinical care, posing new system-level ethical opportunities and ethical challenges.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document