scholarly journals Severe immune-mediated adverse drug reactions and previous history of drug allergy

2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 224-224
2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 319-324
Author(s):  
Helen E. Smith

Adverse drug reactions are a major cause of morbidity, complicating over 5% of therapeutic drug courses. The majority of these events are due to common predictable mechanisms linked to the way the drug works, but about 5% of all reactions are immune-mediated and constitute true allergy. Drug allergy is one of the potential causes of anaphylaxis, angioedema and urticaria and should always be considered when a patient presents with one of these conditions.


1997 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 1378-1387 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A Hess ◽  
Michael J Rieder

OBJECTIVE: To highlight recent advances in the understanding of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), with a focus on models outlining interactions between drug metabolism, disease processes, and immunity. Specific mechanisms that identify the metabolic pathways responsible for drug bioactivation to reactive drug metabolites (RDMs) involved in the initiation and propagation of specific immune-mediated hypersensitivity reactions are discussed. Drug classes well known to be associated with immune-mediated ADRs are reviewed and the clinical implications of current research are discussed. DATA SOURCES: Original experimental research and immunologic review articles relevant to ADR diagnosis and etiology. DATA EXTRACTION: Results of relevant in vitro experiments and clinical reactions to drug therapy were compiled and reviewed. Critical discoveries concerning the identification of RDMs involved in ADRs were highlighted, with respect to RDM involvement in the production of an immune response to drug haptens. DATA SYNTHESIS: Drug adverse effects are classified according to clinical characteristics, immune interactions, and mechanistic similarities. Cytochrome P450 bioactivation of drug molecules to RDMs is a prerequisite to many ADRs. An electrophilic metabolite may react with cellular macromolecules (i.e., lipids, proteins, nucleic acids), resulting in direct cellular damage and organ toxicity. Covalent binding of an RDM to cellular macromolecules may also result in the formation of a hapten that is capable of eliciting a cellular or humoral immune response against drug or protein epitopes, culminating in the characteristic symptoms of hypersensitivity reactions. Mechanistic details concerning the identification of stable protein-metabolite conjugates and their interaction with the immune system remain unclear. Genetic imbalance between bioactivation and detoxification pathways, as well as reduced cellular defense against RDMs due to disease or concomitant drug therapy, act as risk factors to the onset and severity of ADRs. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse reactions to drug therapy cause significant morbidity and mortality. Identification of the pathways involved in drug bioactivation and detoxification may elucidate the potential of chemical agents to induce immune-mediated ADRs. Understanding the mechanisms of ADRs to current xenobiotics is helpful in the prevention and management of ADRs, and may prove useful in the design of novel therapeutic agents with reduced incidence of severe adverse events.


2000 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 47-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matitiahu Lifshitz ◽  
Perez Kornmehl ◽  
Haim Reuveni

Objective: To determine the incidence of adverse drug reactions in patients with acetaminophen overdose following administration of intravenous acetylcysteine, and to evaluate the cost-benefit ratio of intravenous compared with oral acetylcysteine therapy. Methods: The incidence of adverse drug reactions to intravenous acetylcysteine therapy was studied retrospectively in all patients with acetaminophen overdose who were admitted to Soroka University Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel, from 1994 to 1998. Data were obtained from hospital records. All patients were treated with a 20-hour intravenous regimen according to the Prescott protocol. Special attention was paid to the clinical manifestations of adverse reactions, time of onset, and history of patient allergy and asthma. Cost of therapy (drug prices, hospital per diems) for intravenous versus oral acetylcysteine administration was evaluated in accordance with average rates prevailing in Israel in December 1998. Results: Ninety-two patients, 32 adolescents aged 12–18 years (mean ± SD 14.2 ± 1.9) and 60 adults aged 18–52 years (28.2 ± 3.2), were treated with intravenous acetylcysteine for acetaminophen overdose during the study period. Three patients (3.2%) developed adverse reactions: one adult presented with a maculopapular rash and pruritus, and two adolescents developed mild urticaria; no other adverse reactions were reported. All adverse reactions occurred during administration of the loading dose, 15–20 minutes after initiation of therapy. The reactions subsided a few hours after the acetylcysteine infusion was stopped and did not require antiallergy therapy. None of the three patients had a history of allergy. The 20-hour intravenous acetylcysteine protocol is approximately three times less expensive than the recommended oral regimen in terms of drug cost and length of hospitalization. Conclusions: Intravenous acetylcysteine is a relatively safe antidote for acetaminophen poisoning. The incidence rate of adverse reactions is low, and they are mild and easily controlled by termination of the infusion. We recommend intravenous acetylcysteine therapy, particularly for patients with vomiting caused by the acetaminophen overdose or by oral acetylcysteine therapy. The 20-hour intravenous acetylcysteine therapy has a cost-benefit advantage over oral therapy; however, the oral formulation is not approved by the FDA.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 309-309
Author(s):  
Alanna M. Poirier ◽  
Paul Nachowicz ◽  
Subhasis Misra

309 Background: The Pharmacy and Therapeutics committee at a regional cancer center is responsible to report and trend existing adverse drug reactions. The electronic health record did not have an option to document the history of an event or have an alert function if a medication was re-ordered. The frequency of documented adverse drug reactions did not correlate to what was being observed on the units with the use of a paper document. Methods: InAugust 2010 a Lean Six Sigma project was initiated to improve adverse drug reaction reporting. An adverse drug reaction document along with standard work instructions was completed by March 2011. A report was built in the electronic health record and a computer based learning module was created and rolled out to clinical staff by October 2011. Results: The turn-around time in days to document an adverse drug reaction in the patients chart decreased from 6.8 days to 0.7 days. The documented adverse drug reactions increased by 37%; verified by the use of supportive medications. Conclusions: The root cause for under-reporting was attributed to lack of knowledge, process, and automation. The history of an adverse drug reaction can now be viewed and an automatic alert is produced requiring physician acknowledgement decreasing the chance of repeated discomfort or harm to the patient. Adverse drug reaction documentation can be retrieved within 24 hours, analyzed, trended, and used for educational purposes to improve patient safety. [Table: see text]


2005 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 1755-1757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoran Bogdanovic ◽  
Jhansi R Nalamati ◽  
John K Kilcullen ◽  
Sunil Dhuper

Objective: To report a case of antidepressant-induced adverse drug reactions in a patient with hemorrhagic stroke. Case Summary: A 56-year-old man developed life-threatening adverse reactions after fluoxetine was added to his previously prescribed regimen of buspirone and olanzapine. One week after starting fluoxetine 60 mg/day, the patient developed syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion and serotonin syndrome concurrently. The patient had experienced a hemorrhagic stroke before the adverse drug reactions occurred. DISCUSSION: A patient with a history of hemorrhagic stroke developed serious adverse drug reactions when fluoxetine was added to his drug therapy. When the combination therapy was stopped, all adverse effects gradually disappeared and laboratory abnormalities were corrected. The likelihood that the adverse reactions were caused by fluoxetine is probable according to the Naranjo probability scale. In addition, a history of stroke may be a risk factor for the development of such reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Today, patients with depression after experiencing a stroke are treated more effectively, but antidepressant-induced adverse drug reactions may be serious. A growing number of patients are treated for post-stroke depression; they require close supervision and careful dosing of antidepressants to prevent full-blown adverse reactions from occurring.


2014 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel E. Becker

Abstract Adverse reactions may occur with any of the medications prescribed or administered in dental practice. Most of these reactions are somewhat predictable based on the pharmacodynamic properties of the drug. Others, such as allergic and pseudoallergic reactions, are less common and unrelated to normal drug action. This article will review the most common adverse reactions that are unrelated to drug allergy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document