Comparison between Nalbuphine and Ketamine as an adjuvant to Heavy Bupivacaine on Post Dural Puncture Headache

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad A El Gendy ◽  
Gamal M Elewa ◽  
Mina Z Wadea ◽  
Ashraf M Hazem
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Dural Puncture ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Saline Group ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Normal Saline Group ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Post Dural Puncture Headache ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Incidence of post dural puncture headache (PDPH) is relatively high, and many methods have been tried to prevent or treat it, but results are not satisfactory. Both Nalbuphine and Ketamine have analgesic effects, and have been used intrathecally with local anesthetics, but their effects on PDPH were not studied. Objective To study the incidence and severity of PDPH when nalbuphine or ketamine was added as an adjuvant to hyperbaric bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia (primary outcome). Secondary outcomes were the effects of adding nalbuphine or ketamine as an adjuvant to hyperbaric bupivacaine on motor and sensory effects, duration of analgesia, hemodynamics and side effects of both of them. Patients and Methods This prospective double-blind, randomized controlled study was conducted on 320 patients, aged 21–60 years of both sexes, ASA physical status I and II, and allocated for lower abdominal, pelvic, or lower limb surgeries under spinal anesthesia, after approval from ethical committee (Assurance No. FWA 000017585) of Faculty of Medicine, Ain, Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. Contact with 17 patients was lost. So, 303 patients completed the study. Patients were divided into 3 equal groups (101 each) according to drugs injected intrayhecally. Group (N): 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 0.5 mg nalbuphine hydrochloride diluted in 0.5 ml normal saline. Group (K): 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 25 mg ketamine hydrochloride diluted in 0.5 ml normal saline. Group (C): 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 0.5 ml normal saline. Results Incidence of PDPH was statistically significantly less in group N in comparison to Groups K and C, in the first day. But, no statistically significant difference was found between the three groups at 2nd and 3rd days. There was no statistically significant difference between groups according to severity of PDPH by visual analog score (VAS). Group N has the most rapid onset and long duration of sensory block in comparison with groups K and C. There was no statistically significant difference between groups according to onset and duration of motor block and hemodynamic changes. Conclusion Adding nalbuphine, and not ketamine, with hyperbaric bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia decreased incidence of post dural puncture headache, and prolonged the duration of sensory block. Both groups provided adequate anesthesia and analgesia with good hemodynamic stability.

scholarly journals Prevention of Succinylcholine Induced Postoperative Myalgia by Pretreatment with Lignocaine: A Randomized Controlled Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-15
Author(s):  
Muhammad Sazzad Hossain ◽  
Lipika Sanjowal ◽  
Mohammad Mamunur Rashid ◽  
Md Anisur Rahman Babu ◽  
Devashis Saha
Keyword(s):  
Normal Saline ◽  
Muscle Relaxant ◽  
Isotonic Saline ◽  
Saline Group ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Normal Saline Group ◽  
Duration Of Action ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference

Succinylcholine, a depolarizing muscle relaxant possesses a unique property of rapid onset and short duration of action, but is accompanied by side effects such as fasciculation and myalgia. The aim of this study was to investigate the prophylactic effect of intravenous lignocaine on the incidence and severity of succinylcholine-induced postoperative myalgia. This was a randomized controlled double blind study conducted at National Institute of ENT Dhaka, during September to December 2017. Eighty adult patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists status I and II of both sexes for elective surgery under general anesthesia were randomly allocated into two equal groups, lignocaine group and normal saline group. The patients of lignocaine group were pretreated with lignocaine 1.5 mg/kg body weight in 5 ml volume, while patients of normal saline group were given isotonic saline 0.9% in the same volume (5 ml) intravenously. Thereafter, anesthesia was induced in all patients, by injecting 1.5 mg/kg of fentanyl and 2 mg/kg of propofol intravenously. Following the loss of eyelid reflex, 1.5 mg/kg of succinylcholine was injected intravenously as a muscle relaxant and then the patients were intubated. The incidence and severity of myalgia were assessed by a blinded observer 24 hours after surgery. In terms of demographic data, the results of this study showed that there is no significant difference between patients in both groups (P>0.05). Overall, the incidence and severity of succinylcholine-induced myalgia in lignocaine group was significantly less, when compared with normal saline group (P<0.05). Pretreatment with intravenous lignocaine is effective in prevention of postoperative succinylcholine induced myalgia. Faridpur Med. Coll. J. Jan 2019;14(1): 13-15

scholarly journals A comparison of the effect of dexamethasone and pethidine for prevention of shivering after spinal anesthesia in caesarean section: randomization clinical trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. 2646-2650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamideh Gholami ◽  
Yousef Moradi ◽  
Zaher Khazaei ◽  
Shahrzad Tehrani
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Saline Group ◽  
Elective Cesarean Section ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Dexamethasone Group ◽  
Postanesthetic Shivering ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Postanesthetic shivering is one of the most common complications and problems after operations. Medications and drugs can be used to prevent postanesthetic shivering. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of Dexamethasone and Pethidine in preventing postanesthetic shivering after spinal anesthesia in Iranian women undergoing caesarean section. Method: This double-blind randomized clinical trial was performed in 66 pregnant women who were referred to Ayatollah Moosavi Hospital in Zanjan, Iran for elective cesarean section, from December 2011 to November 2012. All participants who have ASA I-II were randomly classified into three groups: Dexamethasone receivers (Group A), Pethidine receivers (Group B), and Normal Saline receivers (Group C). Data were collected and analyzed using SPSS16 software. IRCT registration number of this study is IRCT201112198469N1. Conclusion: Although statistically there was no significant difference between the three groups of Dexamethasone, Pethidine and Normal Saline receivers regarding shivering reduction; clinical complication rate in Dexamethasone group was lower comparedto Pethidine and Normal Saline groups. Results: There was no significant difference between three groups regarding shivering reduction. There were 11 (72.5%) trembling cases in Normal Saline group, 6 cases (27.3%) in Dexamethasone group, and 12 cases (54.5%) in Pethidine group.

scholarly journals Effects of prophylactic ketamine and pethidine to control postanesthetic shivering: A comparative study

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (12) ◽  
pp. 2898-2903 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masoum Khoshfetrat ◽  
Ali Rosom Jalali ◽  
Gholamreza Komeili ◽  
Aliakbar Keykha
Keyword(s):  
Normal Saline ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Saline Group ◽  
Normal Saline Group ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Postanesthetic Shivering ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
One Way Anova

Background: Shivering is an undesirable complication following general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia, whose early control can reduce postoperative metabolic and respiratory complications. Therefore, this study aims to compare the effects of prophylactic injection of ketamine and pethidine on postoperative shivering. Methods: This double-blind clinical trial was performed on 105 patients with short-term orthopedic and ENT surgery. The patients were randomly divided into three groups; 20 minutes before the end of the surgery, 0.4 mg/kg of pethidine was injected to the first group, 0.5 mg/kg of ketamine was injected to the second group, and normal saline was injected to the third group. After the surgery, the tympanic membrane temperature was measured at 0, 10, 20, and 30 minutes. The shivering was also measured by a four-point grading from zero (no shivering) to four (severe shivering). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA, Kruskal Wallis, Chi-square and Pearson correlation. Results: The mean age of patients was 35.8+/-11.45 years in the ketamine group, 34.8+/-11.64 years in the normal saline group, and 33.11+/-10.5 years in the pethidine group. The one-way ANOVA showed no significant difference in the mean age between the three groups (P=0.645). The incidence and intensity of shivering were significantly higher in the normal saline group than in the ketamine and pethidine groups (p=0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the incidence and the intensity of shivering between the ketamine and the pethidine groups (p=0.936). Conclusion: The results showed that the 0.5 mg/kg of ketamine could control the post-anesthetic shivering.  

scholarly journals Comparison of the Effects of Pre-Anesthetic Administration of Normal Saline, Ringer and Voluven on the Spread of Sensory Block With Hyperbaric Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elham Memary ◽  
Alireza Mirkheshti ◽  
Morteza Jabbari Mogddam ◽  
Dariush Abtahi ◽  
Mehdi Yaseri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine

scholarly journals The spinal adjuvent - intrathecal nalbuphine as effective as intrathecal fentanyl

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 4492-4498
Author(s):  
Pratibha Deshmukh ◽  
Medha Sangawar ◽  
Nikita Dhumne ◽  
Vivek Chakole
Keyword(s):  
Dural Puncture ◽  
Local Anaesthetics ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Time Duration ◽  
Post Dural Puncture Headache ◽  
Intraoperative Hypotension ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
To Receive

Opioids are favoured as adjuvants to local anaesthetics for spinal anaesthesia. The present study was aimed to compare the clinical efficiency of intrathecal nalbuphine with fentanyl as an adjuvant to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. 100 adult patients of either sex, ASA grade I and II, aged 18–60 years were randomized into two groups of 50 each to receive either fentanyl 25 μg (Group BF) or nalbuphine 500µg (Group BN) with 3 ml 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine, making drug volume to 3.5 ml in each group. Sensory and motor block characteristics, duration of analgesia, VAS score, haemodynamic and side effects were recorded. The sensorimotor characteristics were comparable and found no significant difference between the two groups, (P>0.05). The time duration for adequate analgesia in group BN was 366.40 ± 37.32min, and in the group, BF was 361.39 ± 43.96min, (P= 0.567). In both, the groups, quality of analgesia during the procedure was excellent in a maximum number of patients (96% each group). Sedation score, hemodynamic and respiratory rate changes were comparable between the two groups. In group BF, 4 (8%) patients complained nausea/ vomiting, pruritus was observed in 2 (4%), intraoperative hypotension in 3 (6%) and bradycardia in 2 (4%) and post-dural puncture headache in 2 patient (4%). In group BN, only bradycardia was observed in 3 (6%) patients. Nalbuphine and fentanyl were found to be equally efficient, but nalbuphine had a lower side effect profile, readily available as it does not come under the Narcotic act. However, we suggest Nalbuphine-bupivacaine combination as a better alternative than fentanyl-bupivacaine combination.

scholarly journals Addition of low-dose sufentanil to ropivacaine for reducing shivering and visceral traction pain during cesarean section

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 030006052110170
Author(s):  
Xiao-Rong Chen ◽  
Tao Gao ◽  
Yin Zhang ◽  
Ming-Qing Peng
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Blood Oxygen Saturation ◽  
Time Duration ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Block Time ◽  
Time Motor

Objective To investigate the efficacy of low-dose sufentanil for preventing shivering and visceral traction pain during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Methods This was a prospective, randomized, controlled study. A total of 112 full-term parturients who underwent elective caesarean delivery were randomly divided into two groups. Group R received 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine intrathecally and group RS received 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine plus 5 µg sufentanil intrathecally. Results There were no significant differences in the maximum sensory block time, motor block time, duration of the surgery, and heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and blood oxygen saturation before and 1, 5, and 10 minutes after spinal anesthesia, and at the end of the surgery between the two groups. Shivering was significantly more common in group R (n = 30) than in group RS (n = 8). The incidence of visceral traction pain in group R (46.43%) was significantly higher than that in group RS (14.29%). There was no significant difference in the newborns’ Apgar scores between the groups. Conclusion Adding low-dose sufentanil to ropivacaine can significantly reduce the incidence of shivering and visceral traction pain after spinal anesthesia.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Prophylactic Intrathecal Normal Saline for Prevention of Post Dural Puncture Headache among Women Undergoing Cesarean Section under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Semagn Abate ◽  
Siraj Ahmed ◽  
Getachew Mergia Anbese
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Dural Puncture ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intrathecal Injection ◽  
Repeated Measurements ◽  
Epidural Needle ◽  
Post Dural Puncture Headache ◽  
Resource Limited

Abstract Background: Post-Dural Puncture Headache is the commonest complication of spinal anesthesia. Body of evidence revealed that Conservative management failed to show significant benefit and epidural needle and catheter techniques didn’t provide conclusive evidence. On the other hand, intrathecal injection of normal saline is a simple technique and cost-effective in a resource-limited setup but it is not well examined on its effectiveness and safety profiles.Methods and materials: After Obtaining Ethical clearance from IRB, 152 mothers scheduled for cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were allocated randomly into two groups. Data analysis was done with SPSS version 22. Descriptive statistics were run to see the overall distribution of the study subjects. Unpaired student’s T-test for continuous symmetric data and Mann-Whitney U test for non-normally distributed data were used. Categorical data were analyzed with Chi-square and fisher’s exact test where appropriate. A generalized estimating equation model was used to investigate the interaction of repeated measurements of NRS pain scores of PDPH. Result: The overall incidence of PDPH was 29.6% while the proportion of patients who experienced PDPH was the highest among patients with control as compared to intervention( 36.8% vs 22%) respectively. The GEE model revealed that the NRS pain score was 0.7, 0.4, and 0.2 unit higher at 12, 24, and 48 respectively in control as compared to the interventionConclusion: prophylactic intrathecal normal saline could be an option in a resource-limited setup where the appropriate spinal needle is not accessible and management of moderate and severe PDPH is not feasibleRegistration: The protocol was registered prospectively in Clinical Trials.gov (NCT04393766).

scholarly journals Nimodipine reduces delayed cerebral vasospasm after intracranial tumor surgery: a retrospective study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Yu ◽  
Yunqian Li ◽  
Zheng Jin ◽  
Fan Chen
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Saline Group ◽  
Intracranial Tumor ◽  
Tumor Surgery ◽  
Normal Saline Group ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Delayed Cerebral Vasospasm ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background：Cerebral vasospasm (CVS) is a serious neurosurgical complication. This retrospective study was performed to analyze if nimodipine can improve prognosis and reduces ischemia secondary to delayed CVS after intracranial tumor surgery.Methods：Retrospective analysis of 94 patients with an anterior cranial fossa tumor and underwent intracranial tumor surgery was performed, with 42 cases treated with normal saline and 52 cases treated with nimodipine solution. Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography was used to measure velocity in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) and the distal extracranial internal carotid artery (eICA). An examination was conducted 1 day before surgery and 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 days after surgery. Follow-up was performed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) 3 months after discharge.Results：We showed that in the nimodipine group, CVS occurred in 13 (25%) patients who did not have CVS in the first three days after operation; nine patients had CVS between 4 and 7 days, and 4 had CVS between 8 and 14 days. In the normal saline group, nineteen (45%) patients had CVS, 3 presented with CVS within 3 days, 11 between 4-7 days and 5 between 8-14 days. A significant difference in the occurrence of CVS was observed between the two groups. Preoperative and postoperative the MCA velocities were compared, revealing a significant change in the normal saline group (P < 0.05) but not in the nimodipine group. Furthermore, significant differences in the outcome were observed between the two groups at the 3-month follow-up (P < 0.05).Conclusions：Nimodipine markedly improves prognosis and significantly reduces ischemia secondary to delayed CVS after intracranial tumor surgery, as well as the risks of mortality and morbidity.

scholarly journals The Effect of Preparing Dialysis Machine Using Normal Saline-Heparin on the Dialysis Adequacy of Hemodialysis Patients: A Crossover, Two-Group, and Randomized Clinical Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed Reza Borzou ◽  
Hiva Azami ◽  
Mahmood Gholyaf ◽  
Leili Tapak ◽  
Tayebeh Nazari Doust
Keyword(s):  
Normal Saline ◽  
Saline Group ◽  
Hemodialysis Patients ◽  
Normal Saline Group ◽  
Heparin Group ◽  
Dialysis Adequacy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
Hemodialysis Machine

Background: Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) need adequate dialysis. Thus, identification of the ways to enhance dialysis adequacy is very important. Objectives: The present study was conducted to examine the effect of preparing a dialysis machine using a normal saline heparin method on the dialysis adequacy of hemodialysis patients. Methods: This study was conducted in Hamadan in 2019. A total of 36 patients with hemodialysis were selected using convenience sampling who were assigned to the control and intervention groups. The hemodialysis machine was primed for one month using a routine method (control) and one month using a normal saline-heparin method (intervention). Urea reduction ratio (URR) and Kt/V indices were calculated at the beginning and end of each month in the intervention and control groups. Data were analyzed using paired and independent t-test. Results: In the normal saline-heparin group, KT/V showed a statistically significant difference before and after the treatment (P = 0.013), as well as an increase in the KT/V. The URR as the mean dialysis adequacy showed a statistically significant difference (P = 0.004) between the normal saline group and the normal saline-heparin group before and after the treatment. Moreover, URR in the normal saline-heparin group increased after the treatment. In the normal saline treatment group, KT/V and URR decreased after the treatment. In the normal saline group, URR decreased after the treatment. Conclusions: Applying the hemodialysis machine preparation with a normal saline-heparin method increased dialysis adequacy in the patients who underwent hemodialysis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document