Efficient Asset Management: A Practical Guide to Stock Portfolio Optimization and Asset Allocation.

2001 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 901-904 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard O. Michaud ◽  
Tongshu Ma
Author(s):  
Jonathan Fletcher

AbstractI use the simulation approach of Jobson and Korkie (J Portfolio Manag 7:70–74, 1981), combined with Michaud optimization (Michaud and Michaud, Efficient asset management: a practical guide to stock portfolio optimization and asset allocation, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008), to evaluate whether US international equity closed-end funds (CEF) provide out-of-sample diversification benefits. My study finds that international CEF do not provide diversification benefits across the whole sample period. However, the out-of-sample diversification benefits of international CEF do vary across economic states. I find that there are significant diversification benefits when the lagged one-month US Treasury Bill return is lower than normal, and when higher than normal, regardless of the benchmark investment universe used.


Author(s):  
Claudio Boido

As a result of the financial crisis of 2007–2008 and subsequent central banking decisions, the asset management industry changed its asset allocation choices. Asset managers are focusing their attention on the search for new asset classes by taking advantage of the new opportunities to capture risk premia with the aim of exceeding the returns given by traditional investments, including traded equities, fixed income securities, and cash. By doing so, they are trying to improve the selection of alternative assets, such as commodities that sometimes have relatively low correlations with traditional assets. The chapter begins by describing the principles of asset allocation, distinguishing between passive and active asset allocation, also focusing on beta and alternative beta. It then concentrates on how investors can gain exposure to commodities through different investment vehicles and strategies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 201
Author(s):  
Yuan Hu ◽  
W. Brent Lindquist ◽  
Svetlozar T. Rachev

This paper investigates performance attribution measures as a basis for constraining portfolio optimization. We employ optimizations that minimize conditional value-at-risk and investigate two performance attributes, asset allocation (AA) and the selection effect (SE), as constraints on asset weights. The test portfolio consists of stocks from the Dow Jones Industrial Average index. Values for the performance attributes are established relative to two benchmarks, equi-weighted and price-weighted portfolios of the same stocks. Performance of the optimized portfolios is judged using comparisons of cumulative price and the risk-measures: maximum drawdown, Sharpe ratio, Sortino–Satchell ratio and Rachev ratio. The results suggest that achieving SE performance thresholds requires larger turnover values than that required for achieving comparable AA thresholds. The results also suggest a positive role in price and risk-measure performance for the imposition of constraints on AA and SE.


2016 ◽  
Vol 267 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 585-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Panos Xidonas ◽  
Christis Hassapis ◽  
George Mavrotas ◽  
Christos Staikouras ◽  
Constantin Zopounidis

In this chapter I recognize the importance of the stochastic programming as a significant tool in financial planning. The current practice of portfolio optimization is still limited to the simple formulation of linear programming (LR) or quadratic programming (QR) type. For that reason, relevant literature on asset-liability management (ALM) model has been reviewed and two different ALM approaches are compared: first piecewise linear function; and second a nonlinear utility function. This chapter shows that the mathematical programming methodology is ready to challenge the huge problem arising from LP portfolio optimization. A special emphasis was put on the shape of the investors' payoff functions in asset price equilibrium. The results underpin our claim that the nonlinear ALM model generated better asset allocation. An algorithmic construction of ALM model is developed in Wolfram Mathematica 9.


Author(s):  
Jhuma Ray ◽  
Siddhartha Bhattacharyya ◽  
N. Bhupendro Singh

Portfolio optimization stands to be an issue of finding an optimal allocation of wealth to place within the obtainable assets. Markowitz stated the problem to be structured as dual-objective mean-risk optimization, pointing the best trade-off solutions within a portfolio between risks which is measured by variance and mean. Thus the major intention was nothing else than hunting for optimum distribution of wealth over a specific amount of assets by diminishing risk and maximizing returns of a portfolio. Value-at-risk, expected shortfall, and semi-variance measures prove to be complex for measuring risk, for maximization of skewness, liquidity, dividends by added objective functions, cardinality constraints, quantity constraints, minimum transaction lots, class constraints in real-world constraints all of which are incorporated in modern portfolio selection models, furnish numerous optimization challenges. The emerging portfolio optimization issue turns out to be extremely tough to be handled with exact approaches because it exhibits nonlinearities, discontinuities and high-dimensional, efficient boundaries. Because of these attributes, a number of researchers got motivated in researching the usage of metaheuristics, which stand to be effective measures for finding near optimal solutions for tough optimization issues in an adequate computational time frame. This review report serves as a short note on portfolio optimization field with the usage of Metaheuristics and finally states that how multi-objective metaheuristics prove to be efficient in dealing with portfolio selection problems with complex measures of risk defining non-convex, non-differential objective functions.


IEEE Access ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 155871-155884
Author(s):  
Chun-Hao Chen ◽  
Cheng-Yu Lu ◽  
Tzung-Pei Hong ◽  
Jerry Chun-Wei Lin ◽  
Matteo Gaeta

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document