HOW OUTCOME MEASURES IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS CLINICAL TRIALS WORKS TO DEVELOP OUTCOME MEASURES IN RHEUMATOLOGY CLINICAL TRIALSI116. CHOOSING AND DEVELOPING CORE OUTCOME MEASUREMENT SETS FOR CLINICAL TRIALS: OUTCOME MEASURES IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS CLINICAL TRIALS FILTER 2.0

Rheumatology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maarten Boers
2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 697-700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexis Ogdie ◽  
Maarten de Wit ◽  
Kristina Callis Duffin ◽  
Willemina Campbell ◽  
Jeffrey Chau ◽  
...  

The Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA)-Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) Core Set working group recently published the updated 2016 psoriatic arthritis (PsA) core domain set, a set of disease features that should be measured in all clinical trials. At the GRAPPA annual meeting in July 2016, the PsA working group presented the updated PsA core domain set endorsed by 90% of participants at OMERACT in May 2016 and drafted a roadmap for the development of the PsA core outcome measurement set. In this manuscript, we review the development process of the PsA core domain set and the ongoing and proposed work streams for development of a PsA core measurement set.


Pain ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 113 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert H. Dworkin ◽  
Dennis C. Turk ◽  
John T. Farrar ◽  
Jennifer A. Haythornthwaite ◽  
Mark P. Jensen ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 171 (6) ◽  
pp. 1318-1325 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.R. Chalmers ◽  
J. Schmitt ◽  
C. Apfelbacher ◽  
M. Dohil ◽  
L.F. Eichenfield ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (8) ◽  
pp. 1021-1027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maarten Boers ◽  
Dorcas E. Beaton ◽  
Beverley J. Shea ◽  
Lara J. Maxwell ◽  
Susan J. Bartlett ◽  
...  

Objective.The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Filter 2.0 framework was developed in 2014 to aid core outcome set development by describing the full universe of “measurable aspects of health conditions” from which core domains can be selected. This paper provides elaborations and updated concepts (OMERACT Filter 2.1).Methods.At OMERACT 2018, we discussed challenges in the framework application caused by unclear or ambiguous wording and terms and incompletely developed concepts.Results.The updated OMERACT Filter 2.1 framework makes benefits and harms explicit, clarifies concepts, and improves naming of various terms.Conclusion.We expect that the Filter 2.1 framework will improve the process of core set development.


2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (8) ◽  
pp. 1041-1046 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Humphrey-Murto ◽  
Richard Crew ◽  
Beverley Shea ◽  
Susan J. Bartlett ◽  
Lyn March ◽  
...  

Objective.Developing international consensus on outcome measures for clinical trials is challenging. The following paper will review consensus building in Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT), with a focus on the Delphi.Methods.Based on the literature and feedback from delegates at OMERACT 2018, a set of recommendations is provided in the form of the OMERACT Delphi Consensus Checklist.Results.The OMERACT delegates generally supported the use of the checklist as a guide. The checklist provides guidance for clearly outlining the multiple aspects of the Delphi process.Conclusion.OMERACT is deeply committed to consensus building and these recommendations should be considered a work in progress.


2013 ◽  
Vol 72 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A550.3-A551
Author(s):  
M. Boers ◽  
J. R. Kirwan ◽  
G. Wells ◽  
D. Beaton ◽  
L. Gossec ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document