scholarly journals Lessons learned from service design of a trial of a digital mental health service: Informing implementation in primary care clinics

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 598-605
Author(s):  
Andrea K Graham ◽  
Carolyn J Greene ◽  
Thomas Powell ◽  
Pauli Lieponis ◽  
Amanda Lunsford ◽  
...  

Abstract Implementing a digital mental health service in primary care requires integration into clinic workflow. However, without adequate attention to service design, including designing referral pathways to identify and engage patients, implementation will fail. This article reports results from our efforts designing referral pathways for a randomized clinical trial evaluating a digital service for depression and anxiety delivered through primary care clinics. We utilized three referral pathways: direct to consumer (e.g., digital and print media, registry emails), provider referral (i.e., electronic health record [EHR] order and provider recommendation), and other approaches (e.g., presentations, word of mouth). Over the 5-month enrollment, 313 individuals completed the screen and reported how they learned about the study. Penetration was 13%, and direct to consumer techniques, most commonly email, had the highest yield. Providers only referred 16 patients through the EHR, half of whom initiated the screen. There were no differences in referral pathway based on participants’ age, depression severity, or anxiety severity at screening. Ongoing discussions with providers revealed that the technologic implementation and workflow design may not have been optimal to fully affect the EHR-based referral process, which potentially limited patient access. Results highlight the importance of designing and evaluating referral pathways within service implementation, which is important for guiding the implementation of digital services into practice. Doing so can ensure that sustained implementation is not left to post-evaluation bridge-building. Future efforts should assess these and other referral pathways implemented in clinical practice outside of a research trial.

Author(s):  
Rachel Marie Tindall ◽  
Melissa Ferris ◽  
Meredith Townsend ◽  
Gayle Boschert ◽  
Steven Moylan

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 208-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parashar P Ramanuj ◽  
Carlos FA Carvalho ◽  
Robert Harland ◽  
Philippa A Garety ◽  
Tom KJ Craig ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary C. Ruffolo ◽  
Michael S. Spencer ◽  
Cristina Bares ◽  
Jerry L. Rushton

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yvette Maker ◽  
Bernadette McSherry

This article argues that there exist unnecessary gaps in the regulation of the use of physical, mechanical and chemical restraints in mental health and aged care settings. While the use of these forms of restraint may be rationalised on the basis of preventing harm to self or others, there are adverse consequences that necessitate the minimisation, if not elimination, of their use. The overuse of mechanical and chemical restraints at the Oakden Older Persons Mental Health Service in South Australia led to several scathing inquiries. This article looks at the lessons learned and suggests a multidimensional, consistent approach is overdue.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document