Feminism and Criminal Justice: A Historical Perspective. By Anne Logan.

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 578-580
Author(s):  
L. Seal
1986 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 177-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
William G. Staples

Over the past decade, restitution has assumed increasing significance as a sanction both in the juvenile and in the criminal justice system. The purpose of this article is to examine the current trend toward utilizing restitution from a critical and historical perspective. Current restitution policies and practices are placed within the context of three major trends in justice: (1) the individualization of the juvenile court; (2) the growing concern with the victims of crime, and (3) the blurring of traditional distinctions between criminal and tort law. Restitution as a sanction is evaluated in the context of these three developments, and the contemporary form of restitution is compared with its historical predecessors.


Author(s):  
Thomas C. Guiney

The chapter outlines the central concerns of this book. It builds the case for the study of early release in comparative historical perspective and highlights the important, but often overlooked, role early release has played within the criminal justice apparatus of the liberal democratic state. It goes on to locate the evolution of early release within a wider context of policy change and, using a case study approach, identifies three critical periods of reform that exemplify the evolving ideas, trade-offs, and political controversies that marked the evolution of early release in England and Wales between 1960 and 1995.


1983 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 631-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Rothman

It is the purpose of this essay not only to trace the series of stages that sentencing practices have moved through in this country since the beginning of the nineteenth century but to analyze the elements fostering change. The discussion will open with a chronological presentation of the history of sentencing and then move to explore several substantive themes that emerge from this history. It appears that sentencing procedures have traditionally been called upon to bear too heavy a burden in criminal justice. Sentencing reform has tended to minimize the impact of informal mechanisms upon actual practice. It may also be that the search for mathematical precision in sentencing is a symptom of the almost overwhelming current confusion about the purposes of sentencing. The analysis of change presented here argues too that the general public appears to have exerted little influence upon the adoption or revision of sentencing procedures. Finally, there is some reason to anticipate that the determinate sentence movement will not take firm hold in the near future, that it will not replace the Progressive indeterminate sentencing procedures.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-88
Author(s):  
Ismanto Ismanto ◽  
Suparman Suparman

What about the development of Islamic criminal law in Nusantara? This question should have been raised for the position of Islamic civil law is widely related to positive law, both as an influencing element or as a modification of religious norms formulated in civil law, even stated in the substantial legal scope of Law No.7 1989 dealing with religious justice. While Islamic law in the field of criminal justice - to mention another term of the Islamic criminal law - has not attracted much attention like the field of Islamic civil law. Apart from that, the available academic studies are often political in nature and broaden the distance between the understanding of positive criminal law and Islamic law in the field of criminal law. From a macro-historical perspective, the plurality of laws is inevitably a historical reality. The Positivism School believes that: the development of law is formalized for the sake of the law only. These circles strongly reject political interference in law, law by law, legal science in the form of value-free science while political science especially when associated with social science can be in the form of value-loaded science. According to this group's view, the procedure of finding, forming, and implementing law are in the hand of legal apparatus, the law can only be found through the judge's decision. The legal formation process is limited to legitimator products passed by the law. Law is a command of the law giver.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document