Dissociable Brain Activation Responses to 5-Hz Electrical Pain Stimulation

2004 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  
pp. 939-946 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael T. Alkire ◽  
Nathan S. White ◽  
Raymond Hsieh ◽  
Richard J. Haier

Background To elucidate neural correlates associated with processing of tonic aching pain, the authors used high-field (3-T) functional magnetic resonance imaging with a blocked parametric study design and characterized regional brain responses to electrical stimulation according to stimulus intensity-response functions. Methods Pain was induced in six male volunteers using a 5-Hz electrical stimulus applied to the right index finger. Scanning sequences involved different levels of stimulation corresponding to tingling sensation (P1), mild pain (P2), or high pain (P3). Common effects across subjects were sought using a conjunction analyses approach, as implemented in statistical parametric mapping (SPM-99). Results The contralateral posterior/mid insula and contralateral primary somatosensory cortex were most associated with encoding stimulus intensity because they showed a positive linear relation between blood oxygenation level-dependent signal responses and increasing stimulation intensity (P1 < P2 < P3). The contralateral secondary somatosensory cortex demonstrated a response function most consistent with a role in pain intensity encoding because it had no significant response during the innocuous condition (P1) but proportionally increased activity with increasingly painful stimulus intensities (0 < P2 < P3). Finally, a portion of the anterior cingulate cortex (area 24) and supplementary motor area 6 demonstrated a high pain-specific response (P3). Conclusions The use of response function modeling, conjunction analysis, and high-field imaging reveals dissociable regional responses to a tonic aching electrical pain. Most specifically, the primary somatosensory cortex and insula seem to encode stimulus intensity information, whereas the secondary somatosensory cortex encodes pain intensity information. The cingulate findings are consistent with its proposed role in processing affective-motivational aspects of pain.

2001 ◽  
Vol 899 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 36-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Krause ◽  
Ralf Kurth ◽  
Jan Ruben ◽  
Jessica Schwiemann ◽  
Kersten Villringer ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 1934-1943 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert C. Coghill ◽  
Christine N. Sang ◽  
Jose Ma. Maisog ◽  
Michael J. Iadarola

Functional imaging studies of human subjects have identified a diverse assortment of brain areas that are engaged in the processing of pain. Although many of these brain areas are highly interconnected and are engaged in multiple processing roles, each area has been typically considered in isolation. Accordingly, little attention has been given to the global functional organization of brain mechanisms mediating pain processing. In the present investigation, we have combined positron emission tomography with psychophysical assessment of graded painful stimuli to better characterize the multiregional organization of supraspinal pain processing mechanisms and to identify a brain mechanism subserving the processing of pain intensity. Multiple regression analysis revealed statistically reliable relationships between perceived pain intensity and activation of a functionally diverse group of brain regions, including those important in sensation, motor control, affect, and attention. Pain intensity–related activation occurred bilaterally in the cerebellum, putamen, thalamus, insula, anterior cingulate cortex, and secondary somatosensory cortex, contralaterally in the primary somatosensory cortex and supplementary motor area, and ipsilaterally in the ventral premotor area. These results confirm the existence of a highly distributed, bilateral supraspinal mechanism engaged in the processing of pain intensity. The conservation of pain intensity information across multiple, functionally distinct brain areas contrasts sharply with traditional views that sensory-discriminative processing of pain is confined within the somatosensory cortex and can account for the preservation of conscious awareness of pain intensity after extensive cerebral cortical lesions.


Author(s):  
H. E. Rossiter ◽  
S. F. Worthen ◽  
C. Witton ◽  
S. D. Hall ◽  
P. L. Furlong

Neuroreport ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (17) ◽  
pp. 2335-2339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshinobu Iguchi ◽  
Yoko Hoshi ◽  
Masato Tanosaki ◽  
Masato Taira ◽  
Isao Hashimoto

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flavia Mancini ◽  
Martin I. Sereno ◽  
Min-Ho Lee ◽  
Giandomenico D Iannetti ◽  
Irene Tracey

AbstractThe spatial representation of nociceptive input in the human parietal cortex is not fully understood. For instance, it is known that the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) contains a representation of nociceptive-selective input to different fingers, but it is unclear whether S1 subdivisions contain finer-grained, within-finger maps of nociceptive input. It is also unknown whether within-finger maps of somatosensory input exist in intraparietal regions. Therefore, we used high-field 7T functional MRI to reveal within-finger maps of nociceptive and tactile inputs in the human parietal cortex. Although we replicated the previous findings of between-finger maps of nociceptive input spanning S1 subdivisions, we found weak and inconsistent evidence for within-finger maps of nociceptive input in S1 subdivisions. In the same subjects, we found mirrored, within-finger maps of tactile input in areas 3a, 3b, and 1. Importantly, we discovered a within-finger map of nociceptive input, but not of tactile input, in the human intraparietal area 1 (hIP1). In conclusion, our study indicates that the spatial representation of nociceptive input in the parietal cortex partly differs from that of tactile input and reports the discovery of a within-finger map of nociceptive input in hIP1.New & NoteworthyWe report the discovery of a fine-grained map of nociceptive input to finger segments in the human intraparietal area 1.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document