Labeling (Package Insert): Meaning* by the Food and Drug Administration of Not Recommended, Not Indicated, and Off-label Use

2006 ◽  
Vol 104 (5) ◽  
pp. 1107-1107
Author(s):  
Daniel C. Moore
PEDIATRICS ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-145 ◽  
Author(s):  

Physicians who prescribe a new drug that has not been approved for a specific indication or a specific age group frequently find themselves in a quandary. Physicians who prescribe "old," time-honored drugs usually do not consult the package insert or search for US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. This statement was written to clarify the legal and informational status of the package insert and the role of the FDA in approving or not approving drugs for specific indications or specific age groups. The unapproved use of approved drugs, or so-called "off-label" use, is extremely prevalent among physicians who care for children. It is important that such use of compounds be brought up to date with current FDA policies and to emphasize the responsibility of the prescribing physician in the use of these compounds.


2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 965-969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aron S. Yustein ◽  
Daniel Schultz ◽  
Carolyn Neuland ◽  
David S. Buckles ◽  
Joshua C. Nipper ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 317-325
Author(s):  
Melody Ryan

Abstract Epilepsy, although common, remains difficult to treat with as much as 30% of patients having treatment-resistant conditions. Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and Dravet syndrome are childhood-onset epilepsies and among the most difficult to treat. Cannabidiol has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration to treat these conditions in individuals over 2 years of age; however, there is a great deal of interest in off-label use. This article examines 3 cases: 1 of a patient with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, 1 of off-label use of cannabidiol to treat epilepsy, and 1 of nonprescription forms of cannabidiol to treat epilepsy.


2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 303-306
Author(s):  
Christopher F. Hyer

Drugs and medical devices obtain specific on-label indications for use by the Food and Drug Administration. Physicians are able to use such devices and drugs off label as part of the practice of medicine, but is this is good thing? This edition of In the Profession examines what it means to be off label in terms of regulations, clinical studies, industry marketing, and common areas of use.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6074-6074
Author(s):  
C. Angelotta ◽  
A. J. Lurie ◽  
P. R. Yarnold ◽  
S. Singhal ◽  
J. Mehta ◽  
...  

6074 Background: Half of cancer therapies are used off-label, but regulations prohibit package inserts from describing toxicities that occur only in these settings. In 2003, RADAR reported VTE rates of 20% to 62% when thalidomide, approved for leprosy treatment, was used off-label (with dexamethasone) for multiple myeloma. In 2005, the Connecticut attorney general requested that a black box warn of high rates of VTE when thalidomide is used off-label. Subsequently, the thalidomide analogue, lenalidomide, received FDA approval as a myelodysplasia therapy. In phase II/III trials, multiple myeloma response rates were 60% to 92% with lenalidomide/dex therapy. Methods: Published literature, abstracts, and package inserts were reviewed for VTE rates in lenalidomide-treated multiple myeloma. Results: VTE rates were 8.5% to 75% in multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide and dex or erythropoietin; rates were <3.4% when aspirin prophylaxis was added. The FDA approved package insert for lenalidomide preemptively includes a black box warning describing high VTE rates with off-label use of lenalidomide and advises physicians that VTE prophylaxis should be considered, although the effectiveness of various prophylaxis regimens is unknown. Conclusions: Six months after the attorney general requested that a black box warning describe high VTE rates with off-label use of thalidomide, the manufacturer preemptively included an analogous black box warning in the package insert for the thalidomide analogue, lenalidomide, but did not include similar warnings for this toxicity in the package insert for thalidomide. The FDA should require that package inserts describe severe toxicities that commonly occur with off-label use of cancer therapies. This is especially important for severe class-related toxicities such as lenalidomide- and thalidomide- associated VTE. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document