The ipsilateral and contralateral connections of the fifth somatosensory area (SV) in the cat cerebral cortex

Neuroreport ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 7 (14) ◽  
pp. 2385-2388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akio Mori ◽  
Tatsu Fuwa ◽  
Akira Kawai ◽  
Toshiaki Yoshimoto ◽  
Yasuo Hiraba ◽  
...  
1980 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 292-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. E. Bennett ◽  
D. G. Ferrington ◽  
M. Rowe

1978 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 268-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. G. Tanji ◽  
S. P. Wise ◽  
R. W. Dykes ◽  
E. G. Jones

1. The third somatosensory area (SIII) was identified in the cat cerebral cortex by the recording of surface potentials evoked by deflection of a single contralateral mystacial vibrissa. A small amount of tritiated leucine was then injected at the center of the focus of evoked activity and, after a suitable survival period, the brain was prepared for autoradiography. 2. As defined by the presence of an autoradiographic injection, the SIII focus lay in a cytoarchitectonic field characterized in particular by the presence of very large pyramidal cells in layer V and corresponding to area 5a of Hassler and Muhs-Clement (24). 3. The terminal ramifications of corticothalamic cells, as outlined by axoplasmically transported label, formed clustered aggregations in the medial division of the posterior group of thalamic nuclei (Pom) and not in the ventrobasal complex (VB). This part of Pom is known to receive fibers from the spinal cord. 4. Injections of horseradish peroxidase primarily affecting area 5a retrogradely labeled cells in Pom but not in VB. 5. Injections of isotope in the two other foci of vibrissa-evoked activity usually recorded in each brain were invariably found to label a part of area 3b of the first somatosensory area (SI) in the case of the more anterior focus. The second focus sometimes lay in area 2 of SI and sometimes in the second somatosensory area (SII).


2001 ◽  
Vol 85 (5) ◽  
pp. 1823-1835 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Q. Zhang ◽  
M. K. Zachariah ◽  
G. T. Coleman ◽  
M. J. Rowe

Responsiveness of the first somatosensory area (SI) of the cerebral cortex was investigated in the marmoset monkey ( Callithrix jacchus) in association with cooling-induced, reversible inactivation of the second somatosensory area, SII. The aim was to determine whether SI responsiveness to peripheral tactile stimulation depends on SII and therefore whether SI and SII in the marmoset occupy hierarchically equivalent positions in a parallel organizational scheme for thalamocortical tactile processing as appears to be the case in nonprimate mammals. Inactivation of SII was achieved when the temperature over SII was lowered to ≤12°C, as indicated by abolition of the SII-evoked potentials generated by brief tap stimuli to the hand or foot, and by abolition of tactile responses in single SII neurons located at the margin beneath the block. The effect of SII inactivation on SI-evoked potentials was examined in 16 experiments by simultaneous recording of the SI- and SII-evoked potentials. SI-evoked potentials were never abolished and remained unaffected in 11 cases. In three experiments there was a small reduction in amplitude and inconsistent effects in the remaining two. Responsiveness to controlled tactile stimuli was examined quantitatively in 31 individual SI neurons of different functional classes before, during, and after the inactivation of SII. Tactile responsiveness in individual SI neurons was never abolished by SII inactivation, remaining unchanged in 20 neurons (65%) while undergoing some reduction in the remaining 11 SI neurons (35%). This reduction of tactile responsiveness in one-third of SI neurons is most likely attributable to a removal of a facilitatory influence emanating from SII, based on the observation that background activity of the affected neurons was also reduced. Furthermore, phase locking of SI responses to vibrotactile stimulation was unchanged when SII was inactivated. The retention of responsiveness in SI neurons when SII was inactivated by cooling in the marmoset demonstrates that tactile inputs can reach SI without traversing an indirect, serially organized path through SII. The present results, together with our previous observations that responsiveness in the majority of SII neurons survived SI inactivation, demonstrate that there is a parallel organization of the SI and SII areas for tactile processing in the marmoset monkey and that SI and SII occupy hierarchically equivalent positions in a parallel processing network. There is therefore no longer justification for the view that there are fundamental differences in the organization of thalamocortical tactile processing for SI and SII between simian primates, in general, and other mammals.


1968 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 351-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence W. Chakrin ◽  
F.E. Shideman ◽  
Amedeo S. Marrazzi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document