The respiratory inductance plethysmograph (RIP) has recently gained popularity in both the research and clinical arenas for measuring tidal volume (VT) and changes in functional residual capacity (delta FRC). It is important however, to define the likelihood that individual RIP measurements of VT and delta FRC would be acceptably accurate (+/- 10%) for clinical and investigational purposes in spontaneously breathing individuals on continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Additionally, RIP accuracy has not been compared in these regards after calibration by two commonly employed techniques, the least squares (LSQ) and the quantitative diagnostic calibration (QDC) methods. We compared RIP with pneumotachographic (PTH) measurements of delta FRC and VT during spontaneous mouth breathing on 0-10 cmH2O CPAP. Comparisons were made after RIP calibration with both the LSQ (6 subjects) and QDC (7 subjects) methods. Measurements of delta FRC by RIPLSQ and RIPQDC were highly correlated with PTH measurements (r = 0.94 +/- 0.04 and r = 0.98 +/- 0.01 (SE), respectively). However, only an average of 30% of RIPQDC determinations per subject and 31.4% of RIPLSQ determinations per subject were accurate to +/- 10% of PTH values. An average of 55.2% (QDC) and 68.8% (LSQ) of VT determinations per subject were accurate to +/- 10% of PTH values. We conclude that in normal subjects, over a large number of determinations, RIP values for delta FRC and VT at elevated end-expiratory lung volume correlate well with PTH values. However, regardless of whether QDC or LSQ calibration is used, only about one-third of individual RIP determinations of delta FRC and one-half of two-thirds of VT measurements will be sufficiently accurate for clinical and investigational use.
Extended Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Improved Functional Residual Capacity in Infants Born Preterm