Results of the Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid in Unilateral Hearing Loss

2001 ◽  
Vol 111 (6) ◽  
pp. 955-958 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack J. Wazen ◽  
Jaclyn Spitzer ◽  
Soha N. Ghossaini ◽  
Ashutrosh Kacker ◽  
Anne Zschommler
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Unilateral Hearing Loss ◽  
Bone Anchored Hearing Aid

scholarly journals Comparison of performance of transcranial contralateral routing of signal, pre-implanted trimmer digital and digital bone anchored hearing aid in adults with unilateral hearing loss

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Neelamegarajan Devi ◽  
Suma Chatni ◽  
Kasetty Jagannathaiah S. Ramadevi ◽  
Darga Baba Fakruddin
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Speech Perception ◽  
Sound Source ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Sound Field ◽  
Subjective Quality ◽  
Unilateral Hearing Loss ◽  
Digitally Programmable ◽  
Bone Anchored Hearing Aid ◽  
Quality Rating

Individuals with unilateral hearing loss of severe-profound degree face listening difficulties while localizing a sound source and while perceiving speech in the presence of noise. The objective was to compare the efficacy of the digitally programmable bone anchored hearing aid (BAHA), trimmer digital BAHA and the transcranial contralateral routing of signal (T-CROS) in improving the listening performance in adults with unilateral hearing loss. Twenty-four adults with unilateral hearing loss was assessed for sound field thresholds, speech perception performance in quiet and noise (direct and indirect conditions) and the subjective quality rating of speech in unaided and aided with either T-CROS or digitally programmable BAHA or trimmer digital BAHA attached to the headband. Results indicated that the participants performed better with both the digitally programmable and the trimmer digital BAHA than the T-CROS in both quiet and noise. However, the digitally programmable BAHA performed better when the speech arrived from the poorer ear side. The current study helps in prioritizing the hearing amplification devices for the trial and also helps in arriving at the appropriate hearing amplification device for the individuals with unilateral hearing loss.

An approach to bilateral bone-anchored hearing aid surgery in children: contralateral placement of sleeper fixture

2008 ◽  
Vol 123 (5) ◽  
pp. 555-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
J M Bernstein ◽  
P Z Sheehan
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Conductive Hearing Loss ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Contralateral Side ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Calvarial Bone ◽  
Optimal Position ◽  
Bone Anchored Hearing Aid ◽  
Conductive Hearing

AbstractObjective:Bone-anchored hearing aid surgery in younger children is a two-stage procedure, with a titanium fixture being allowed to osseointegrate for several months before an abutment is fitted through a skin graft. In the first procedure, it has been usual to place a reserve or sleeper fixture approximately 5 mm from the primary fixture as a backup in case the primary fixture fails to osseointegrate. This ipsilateral sleeper fixture is expensive, is often not used, and is placed in thinner calvarial bone where it is less likely to osseointegrate successfully. The authors have implanted the sleeper fixture on the contralateral side, with the additional objective of reducing the number of procedures for bilateral bone-anchored hearing aid implantation, providing a cost-effective use for the sleeper.Methods:The authors implanted the bone-anchored hearing aid sleeper fixture in the contralateral temporal bone instead of on the ipsilateral side in seven successive paediatric cases with bilateral conductive hearing loss requiring two-stage bone-anchored hearing aids, treated at the Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, UK.Results:The seven patients ranged in age from five to 15 years, with a mean age of 10 years; in addition, a 20-year-old with learning disability was also treated. In each case, the contralateral sleeper fixture was not needed as a backup fixture, but was used in four patients (57 per cent) as the basis for a second-side bone-anchored hearing aid.Conclusions:In children with bilateral conductive hearing loss, in whom a bilateral bone-anchored hearing aid is being considered and the second side is to be operated upon at a later date, we recommend placing the sleeper fixture on the contralateral side at the time of primary first-side surgery. Our technique provides a sleeper fixture located in an optimal position, where it also offers the option of use for a second-side bone-anchored hearing aid and reduces the number of procedures needed.

scholarly journals Unilateral hearing loss and the use of hearing aid: speech recognition, benefit, self-perception of functional performance and satisfaction

Revista CEFAC ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lidiéli Dalla Costa ◽  
Sinéia Neujahr dos Santos ◽  
Maristela Julio Costa
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Speech Recognition ◽  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Functional Performance ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Brazilian Portuguese ◽  
Unilateral Hearing Loss ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Self Perception ◽  
Sound Amplification

ABSTRACT Purpose: to investigate speech recognition in silence and in noise in subjects with unilateral hearing loss with and without hearing aids, and to analyze the benefit, self-perception of functional performance, satisfaction and the use of hearing aids in these subjects. Methods: eleven adults with unilateral, mixed and sensorineural, mild to severe hearing loss participated in this study. Speech recognition was evaluated by the Brazilian Portuguese sentences lists test; functional performance of the hearing was assessed by using the Speech Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale questionnaire; satisfaction was assessed by the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life questionnaire, both in Brazilian Portuguese; and to assess the use of hearing aids, the patient's report was analyzed. Results: the adaptation of hearing aids provided benefits in speech recognition in all positions evaluated, both in silence and in noise. The subjects did not report major limitations in communication activities with the use of hearing aids. They were satisfied with the use of sound amplification. Most of the subjects did not use hearing aids, effectively. The discontinuity of hearing aids use can be justified by the difficulty on perceiving participation’s restriction caused by hearing loss, as well as the benefit of the hearing aid, besides the concern with batteries’ costs and aesthetic aspects. Conclusion: although showing benefits in speech recognition, in silence and in noise, and satisfaction with sound amplification, most subjects with unilateral hearing loss do not effectively use hearing aids.

scholarly journals Reabilitação com prótese auditiva em indivíduos com perda auditiva unilateral: revisão sistemática

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 386-393
Author(s):  
Lidiéli Dalla Costa ◽  
Maryndia Diehl Müller ◽  
Maristela Julio Costa
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Unilateral Hearing Loss

Objetivo: Determinar, por meio de uma revisão sistemática, os resultados auditivos da reabilitação por meio de prótese auditiva em indivíduos com Perda Auditiva Unilateral (PAUn), no que se refere às habilidades de reconhecimento de fala na presença de ruído competitivo, localização da fonte sonora, satisfação e tempo de uso da prótese auditiva. Método: O levantamento bibliográfico foi realizado nas bases de dados Cochrane, Lilacs, Medline, Pubmed e Scielo, buscando triar estudos publicados entre 1997 e 2017, com os seguintes descritores em português: perda auditiva unilateral e auxiliares de audição; e em inglês: unilateral hearing loss e hearing aid. Os critérios de seleção dos estudos foram, amostra de indivíduos com PAUn, com idade mínima de 18 anos, que tivessem sido submetidos a avaliações de resultados voltados para a investigação do reconhecimento de fala na presença de ruído e/ou localização da fonte sonora e/ou satisfação e/ou tempo de uso da prótese auditiva, pré e pós-adaptação de prótese auditiva. Resultados: Após o levantamento bibliográfico, seis artigos foram analisados. Conclusão: Observou-se escassez de estudos voltados para a investigação da reabilitação por meio de prótese auditiva em indivíduos com PAUn. Apesar da maioria dos estudos demonstrarem benefício e satisfação com a adaptação de prótese auditiva, parte desta população não faz uso da mesma. A adaptação de prótese auditiva nesta população deve ser incentivada, levando em consideração a avaliação da demanda comunicativa de cada indivíduo, sua restrição de participação, principais queixas auditivas deste indivíduo pré e pós-adaptação e do ajuste de programação da prótese auditiva.

Predicted Gain and Functional Gain With Transcranial Routing of Signal Completely-in-the-Canal Hearing Aids

2003 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc A. Fagelson ◽  
Colleen M. Noe ◽  
Owen D. Murnane ◽  
Jennifer S. Blevins
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Mechanical Vibration ◽  
Signal Frequency ◽  
Unilateral Hearing Loss ◽  
External Canal ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Acoustic Output ◽  
Functional Gain

Transcranial routing of signal (TCROS) was accomplished using completely-in-the-canal (CIC) hearing aids in 5 profoundly unilaterally hearing-impaired individuals. The functional gain realized by the participants far exceeded the gain predicted by measuring the acoustic output and real ear aided response of the hearing aids. The difference between predicted and functional gain increased with signal frequency and was attributed at least in part to mechanical vibration of the hearing aid in the external canal. Implications for fitting unilateral hearing loss using TCROS amplifying systems are discussed.

The bone anchored hearing aid—The third option for otosclerosis

1996 ◽  
Vol 110 (21) ◽  
pp. 31-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. P. Burrell ◽  
H. C. Cooper ◽  
D. W. Proops
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Treatment Option ◽  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Queen Elizabeth Hospital ◽  
Suppurative Otitis Media ◽  
The Third ◽  
Hearing Ability ◽  
Bone Anchored Hearing Aid ◽  
Experience Difficulty

AbstractThe bone anchored hearing aid (BAHA) has mainly been used for the treatment of hearing loss in patients with congenital conductive problems or chronic suppurative otitis media.In a five-year period, 32 otosclerotic patients have been referred to the Queen Elizabeth Hospital for consideration of a BAHA. Ten of these patients have been fitted and gained benefit compared to their previous hearing aid. The benefits are not necessarily those in hearing ability but in some cases relate to cosmetic or comfort improvements. This paper demonstrates that the BAHA offers a third treatment option for otosclerosis in patients who cannot or will not undergo stapedectomy and experience difficulty with conventional hearing aids.

scholarly journals Hearing with Bone-anchored Hearing Aid (BAHA)

2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
MV Kirtane ◽  
Gauri Mankekar ◽  
Payal Bhattacharya Chitranshi
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Hearing Aids ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Bone Anchored Hearing Aid

Abstract BAHA is a surgically implantable system for treatment of hearing loss in patients wherein conventional hearing aids are unable to provide benefit. e.g. patients with microtia, chronic ear discharge or single sided hearing loss.

scholarly journals A simple masking method using earplugs and earmuffs for hearing aid fitting in patients with unilateral hearing loss

2016 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 232-237
Author(s):  
Takanori Nishiyama ◽  
Seiichi Shinden ◽  
Daisuke Suzuki ◽  
Hiroshi Okazaki ◽  
Koji Sakamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Unilateral Hearing Loss ◽  
Hearing Aid Fitting ◽  
Fitting In

Successful bone-anchored hearing aid implantation in a patient with osteogenesis imperfecta

2015 ◽  
Vol 129 (11) ◽  
pp. 1133-1136 ◽  
Author(s):  
M B Coutinho ◽  
C Marques ◽  
G J Mendes ◽  
C Gonçalves
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Osteogenesis Imperfecta ◽  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Hearing Aid ◽  
Resonance Frequency Analysis ◽  
Implant Stability ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Mixed Hearing Loss ◽  
Bone Anchored Hearing Aid

AbstractObjective:To report a case of successful bone-anchored hearing aid implantation in an adult patient with type III osteogenesis imperfecta, which is commonly regarded as a contraindication to this procedure.Case report:A 45-year-old man with type III osteogenesis imperfecta presented with mixed hearing loss. There was a mild sensorineural component in both ears, with an air–bone gap between 45 and 50 dB HL. He was implanted with a bone-anchored hearing aid. The audiological outcome was good, with no complications and good implant stability (as measured by resonance frequency analysis).Conclusion:To our knowledge, this is the first recorded case of bone-anchored hearing aid implantation in a patient with osteogenesis imperfecta.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document