Lumbar Sagittal Balance Influences the Clinical Outcome After Decompression and Posterolateral Spinal Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Spine ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mamoru Kawakami ◽  
Tetsuya Tamaki ◽  
Muneharu Ando ◽  
Hiroshi Yamada ◽  
Hiroshi Hashizume ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 116S
Author(s):  
Keigo Yasui ◽  
Manabu Ito ◽  
Kuniyoshi Abumi ◽  
Yoshihisa Kotani ◽  
Jun-Ichiro Okumura ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (04) ◽  
pp. 1250020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takato Aihara ◽  
Tomoaki Toyone ◽  
Yasuchika Aoki ◽  
Tomoyuki Ozawa ◽  
Gen Inoue ◽  
...  

Fifty consecutive patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis were treated surgically. The first 17 patients (FU group) underwent decompression with fusion, the second 33 patients (MED group) underwent microendoscopic decompression (MED), and the outcomes following the two surgical methods were compared. The duration of follow-up ranged from 27 to 40 months in the FU group and from 25 to 40 months in the MED group. Clinical outcomes were evaluated with use of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Although statistically not significant, the degrees of improvement in all five functional scores were greater in the MED group than in the FU group. There was no influence of instability before MED to the clinical outcome, and a large percentage of slipping in the neutral position could lead to inadequate improvement in low back pain after MED, but MED is a useful, minimally invasive operation and can lead to a good clinical outcome for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Considering the lower invasiveness of MED, this procedure is recommended in case of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with less than 20% slipping. Posterior decompression and fusion using pedicular screws is recommended in case of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with over 20% slipping.


2001 ◽  
Vol 72 (4) ◽  
pp. 354-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Finn B Christensen ◽  
Malene Laursen ◽  
John Gelineck ◽  
Ebbe S Hansen ◽  
Cody E Bünger

2015 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 186-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcel Machado da Motta ◽  
Raphael Rezende Pratali ◽  
Marcela Almeida Campos Coutinho ◽  
Carla Balkanyi Hoffman ◽  
Carlos Eduardo Gonçales Barsotti ◽  
...  

Objective:To correlate obesity with radiographic parameters of spinal and spinopelvic balance in patients undergoing spinal arthrodesis, and to correlate obesity with clinical outcome of these patients.Methods:Observational retrospective study including patients who underwent spinal arthrodesis, with minimum follow-up period of three months. We measured waist circumference, as well as height and weight to calculate body mass index (BMI) and obtained radiographs of the total column. The clinical parameters studied were pain by visual analog scale (VAS) and the Oswestry questionnaire (ODI). Obesity correlated with radiographic parameters of the sagittal and spinopelvic balance and postoperative clinical parameters.Results:32 patients were analyzed. The higher the BMI, the greater the value of VAS found, but without statistical significance (p=0.83). There was also no correlation between BMI and the ODI questionnaire. Analyzing the abdominal circumference, there was no correlation between the VAS and ODI. There was no correlation between BMI or waist circumference and the radiographic parameters of global spinopelvic sagittal alignment. Regarding the postoperative results, there was no correlation between the mean BMI and waist circumference and the postoperative results for ODI and VAS (p=0.75 and p=0.7, respectively).Conclusions:The clinical outcomes of patients who undergone spinal fusion were not affected by the BMI and waist circumference. Also, there was no correlation between radiographic parameters of spinal and spinopelvic sagittal balance with obesity in patients previously treated with arthrodesis of the spine.


Author(s):  
Maximilian Lenz ◽  
S. Oikonomidis ◽  
R. Hartwig ◽  
R. Gramse ◽  
C. Meyer ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Lumbar spinal fusion surgery is a widely accepted surgical treatment in degenerative causes of lumbar spondylolisthesis. The benefit of reduction of anterior displacement and restoration of sagittal parameters is still controversially debated. Purpose of the underlying publication was to analyze the influence of radiographic sagittal parameters of the spine in aspects of changes in postoperative clinical outcome. Materials and methods By prospective analysis, we included patients with low-grade degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (Meyerding grades I and II) with mono- or bisegmental fusion surgery with a minimum follow-up data of 3 years. For clinical outcome measures, COMI, ODI and EQ-5D were used. Spinopelvic parameters (sacral inclination, pelvic tilt, sacral slope and pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis and lumbar index as well as anterior displacement and sagittal rotation) were measured on plain radiographs. Results We could observe a significant benefit in clinical outcome after lumbar fusion surgery in low-grade spondylolisthesis in our mid-term follow-up data including 32 patients. By surgical reduction, we could see significant restoration of anterior displacement and sagittal rotation. Interestingly, a significant correlation between restoration of both sagittal rotation and sacral inclination and clinical outcome score was observed in the 3-year follow-up. Conclusion In low-grade spondylolisthesis, spinal fusion surgery is a well-established surgical procedure; however, the impact of sagittal parameters and reduction of anterior displacement remains controversial. Within our findings, restoration of sagittal parameters showed significant correlation to improvement in clinical outcome in our mid-term follow-up data.


Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. e23783
Author(s):  
Renjie Li ◽  
Xiaofeng Shao ◽  
Xuefeng Li ◽  
Yijie Liu ◽  
Weimin Jiang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document