Possible Effects of New National Allocation Policy for Deceased Donor Kidneys in the US.

2014 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. 87-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Israni ◽  
A. Hart ◽  
S. Gustafson ◽  
N. Salkowski ◽  
J. Snyder ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. S224
Author(s):  
K. Bradbrook ◽  
K. Lindblad ◽  
R.R. Goff ◽  
R. Daly ◽  
S. Hall

2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 1842-1848 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajay K. Israni ◽  
Nicholas Salkowski ◽  
Sally Gustafson ◽  
Jon J. Snyder ◽  
John J. Friedewald ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (12) ◽  
pp. 2127-2131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip A Clayton ◽  
Kathryn Dansie ◽  
Matthew P Sypek ◽  
Sarah White ◽  
Steve Chadban ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The US Kidney Donor Risk Index (KDRI) and the UK KDRI were developed to estimate the risk of graft failure following kidney transplantation. Neither score has been validated in the Australian and New Zealand (ANZ) population. Methods Using data from the Australia and New Zealand Organ Donor (ANZOD) and Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registries, we included all adult deceased donor kidney-only transplants performed in ANZ from 2005 to 2016 (n = 6405). The KDRI was calculated using both the US donor-only and UK formulae. Three Cox models were constructed (Model 1: KDRI only; Model 2: Model 1 + transplant characteristics; Model 3: Model 2 + recipient characteristics) and compared using Harrell’s C-statistics for the outcomes of death-censored graft survival and overall graft survival. Results Both scores were strongly associated with death-censored and overall graft survival (P < 0.0001 in all models). In the KDRI-only models, discrimination of death-censored graft survival was moderately good with C-statistics of 0.63 and 0.59 for the US and UK scores, respectively. Adjusting for transplant characteristics resulted in marginal improvements of the US KDRI to 0.65 and the UK KDRI to 0.63. The addition of recipient characteristics again resulted in marginal improvements of the US KDRI to 0.70 and the UK KDRI to 0.68. Similar trends were seen for the discrimination of overall graft survival. Conclusions The US and UK KDRI scores were moderately good at discriminating death-censored and overall graft survival in the ANZ population, with the US score performing slightly better in all models.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
William S Asch ◽  
Darren Stewart ◽  
Richard N Formica

Deceased donor kidneys for transplantation represent a scarce national resource. Therefore, allocation practices must be built on fair and equitable policies that ensure the best possible use of each kidney. The current kidney allocation policy was a decade in the making and required multiple rounds of public comment and revision to create a policy that balances utility and equity. The new allocation policy improves utility by maximizing life-years gained from kidney transplantation through longevity matching: pairing those patients with the longest expected life with kidneys expected to last the longest. It also, for the first time in kidney allocation, allocates kidneys based on need by prioritizing the highly sensitized patient and giving waiting time credit for time spent on dialysis prior to registration. Finally, the system attempts to both increase recovery and promote rapid placement of kidney from older donors. This is done through an opt-in system that attempts to allocate kidneys with a shorter duration of expected function and a higher Kidney Donor Profile Index to older recipients who would trade off a greater duration of function for more rapid transplantation. Coupled with the new allocation policy, the use of biopsy results from deceased donor grafts, characteristics of blood flow when placed on mechanical perfusion devices, and molecular biomarker measurement have the potential to expand the available pool of deceased donor kidneys. The new approach to kidney allocation in the United States provides a case study into how to thoughtfully and equitably distribute a scarce resource.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document