The Vancouver Classification of Periprosthetic Fractures of the Hip: A Rational Approach to Treatment

1999 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Owen H. Brady ◽  
Robert Kerry ◽  
Bassam A. Masri ◽  
Donald S. Garbuz ◽  
Clive P. Duncan
Author(s):  
F.S. Haddad ◽  
F. Rayan

♦ Periprosthetic fractures: intraoperative or postoperative femoral or acetabular fractures♦ Third commonest reason for reoperation after THA♦ Vancouver classification Type A, B, and C♦ Three most important factors that determine treatment are:• Site of the fracture• Stability of the implant• Quality of the surrounding bone stock.


1991 ◽  
Vol 159 (S14) ◽  
pp. 29-35
Author(s):  
Francis T. Varghese

According to Kendell (Kendell, 1975) the classification of psychiatric disorders should “cleave nature at its joints”. The central task of nosology then is to discover ‘nature's joints‘. There are, generally speaking, two major approaches to this task, which as Kendell has outlined, trace their origins to the epistemological debates between Platonic and Aristotelian schools. The first is the empirical approach from Locke and Hume, which is currently in ascendancy as exemplified by DSM—III and DSM—III—R, (American Psychiatric Association, 1980, 1987) while the second can be regarded as the ‘rational‘ approach deriving from the philosophy of Kant (Varghese, 1988). Table 1 outlines the differences between nosological approaches.


Injury ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 661-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.M. Ninan ◽  
M.L. Costa ◽  
S.J. Krikler

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document