Radiation Protection Devices Manufactured by Pulse Medical

1997 ◽  
Vol 27 (19) ◽  
pp. 148
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 1185-1190
Author(s):  
V. V. Karanskij ◽  
S. V. Smirnov ◽  
A. S. Klimov ◽  
E. V. Savruk

2009 ◽  
Vol 44 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 673-691 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Silari ◽  
S. Agosteo ◽  
P. Beck ◽  
R. Bedogni ◽  
E. Cale ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 277-282
Author(s):  
Lakshmi Yadav ◽  
Navreet Boora ◽  
Raushan Kumar

Aim: The aim of this study to assess the knowledge of radiographic students about radiation protection devices, their use and handling. Methods: A prospective, questionnaire-based study was carried out in Department of Radiological and Imaging Techniques. A validated questionnaire was circulated among undergraduate and postgraduate Radiographic students. Result: Out of 169 participants was 150(88.7%) of undergraduate, postgraduate and diploma students of radiological and imaging techniques filled questionnaire in this study. To assess knowledge about radiation protection devices, their use and handling, which they gain during theory classes and from hospital posting. There were 58(38.7%) were female and 92 (61.3%) were male. Conclusion: Study concluded that there should be proper theory classes for the conduction of knowledge about radiation protection devices, their use and handling in radiology department. Training session and teaching standards should be taken in account for not only the number of hours required to obtain the knowledge with the equipment required to run the classes in the simulation-based learning environment. This questionnaire-based survey demonstrates that up-to-date radiation protection devices, their use and handling skill in among radiography students of college of paramedical sciences were not sufficient, this should be improved by the well-designed training and theoretical sessions. From this study, we suggest that all members of the health care community should attend the webinars, guest lectures and training sessions about knowledge of radiation protection devices, their use and handling in radiology department. Keywords: Radiation protection devices, Lead equivalent, X-ray, Radiology department.


1988 ◽  
Vol 23 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 285-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Buxerolle ◽  
J.L. Chartier ◽  
J. Kurkdjian ◽  
R. Médioni ◽  
M. Massoutié ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 42 (06) ◽  
pp. 251-254
Author(s):  
C. Pirich ◽  
P. John ◽  
S. Ofluoglu ◽  
H. Sinzinger ◽  
E. Havlik ◽  
...  

Summary Aim: To estimate radiation doses deriving from patients treated with 166Ho ferric hydroxide. Methods: For radiation synoviorthesis about 900 ± 100 MBq 166Ho ferric hydroxide was injected into the knee joint of 16 patients. To estimate the radiation exposure of persons in the neighbourhood of the patients measurements of the dose rates were performed at 0.5 m, 1 m and 2 m distance of the treated joint 10 min after tracer injection. Measurements were carried out with and without radiation protection devices of the syringe. Results: The initial values of the dose rate were 11.9 μSv/h at 0.5 m, 3.5 μSv/h at 1 m and 1 μSv/h at 2 m distance, respectively. The whole body doses were 2.9 μSv for the physician and 4.6 μSv for the technologist. The finger doses for the technologist and the physician were ranging from 65 to 111 μSv. After discharge at home other persons might receive 118 μSv. Conclusion: Our results, under very strict assumptions, clearly demonstrate that the calculated radiation exposure to medical and non medical personnel is well below the maximum annual dose limit. The use of any additional radiation protection device as syringe shielding does not significantly lower radiation exposure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document