What is the most effective way to ablate the nail matrix during surgical treatment of an ingrown toenail?

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 12
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Robinson ◽  
Elizabeth Pietralczyk
Foot & Ankle ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 130-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth A. Pettine ◽  
Robert H. Cofield ◽  
Kenneth A. Johnson ◽  
Randy M. Bussey

When an ingrown toenail is unresponsive to simple treatment methods, surgical treatment options are available. At our institution, 100 patients with 142 affected toes were surgically treated by one of five techniques and observed for a mean of 9.7 years (range, 7.8 to 10.0 years). Plastic nail wall reduction was effective (four of four nail edges) for mild disease. After marginal nail excision with chemical matrix ablation, the recurrence rate was 20% (12 of 61 nail edges); eight required further surgical treatment. Marginal nail excision combined with surgical excision of the associated nail matrix (Heifetz procedure) was more successful: recurrence occurred in only 6% (6 of 95 nail edges), and only one toe required further surgical treatment. For severe nail deformity, nail ablation with matrix excision (Zadik procedure) was followed by recurrence in 33% (three of nine toes); all three required additional surgical treatment. After terminal amputation (Lapidus/Thompson-Terwilliger procedure), the recurrence rate was 12% (2 of 17 toes); only one nail required additional surgical treatment.


Author(s):  
Beom Suk Kim ◽  
Kyungho Kim ◽  
Jonathan Day ◽  
Jesse Seilern Und Seilern Und Aspang ◽  
Jaeyoung Kim

Background: Digital nerve block (DB) is a commonly utilized anesthetic procedure in ingrown toenail surgery. However, severe procedure-related pain has been reported. Although the popliteal sciatic nerve block (PB) is widely accepted in foot and ankle surgery, its use in ingrown toenail surgery has not been reported. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of PB in the surgical treatment of ingrown toenails. Methods: One-hundred-ten patients surgically treated for an ingrown toenail were enrolled. Sixty-six patients underwent DB, and 44 underwent PB. PB was performed under ultrasound-guidance via a 22-gauge needle with 15 mL of 1% lidocaine in the popliteal region. The visual analogue scale was used to assess pain at two-time points: pain with skin penetration and pain with the solution injection. Time to sensory block, duration of sensory block, need for additional injections, and adverse events were recorded. Results: PB group demonstrated significantly lower procedure-related pain than the DB group. Time to sensory block was significantly longer in the PB group (20.8 ± 4.6 versus 6.5 ± 1.6 minutes). The sensory block duration was significantly longer in the PB group (187.9 ± 22.0 versus 106.5 ± 19.1 minutes). Additional injections were required in 16 (24.2%) DB cases, while no additional injections were required in PB cases. Four adverse events occurred in the DB group and two in the PB group. Conclusion: PB was a less painful anesthetic procedure associated with a longer sensory block duration and fewer repeat injections compared with DB. The result of this study implicates that PB can be an alternative anesthetic option in the surgical treatment of ingrown toenails.


2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 227-230
Author(s):  
Ozan Beytemur ◽  
Yasar Mahsut Dincel ◽  
Oktay Adanir ◽  
Alican Baris ◽  
Ender Alagoz ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 302-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiyuki Ozawa ◽  
Kensuke Nose ◽  
Teruichi Harada ◽  
Michinari Muraoka ◽  
Masamitsu Ishii

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document