NACCHO Helps Local Health Departments Adapt to the Ever-Changing Field of Environmental Health

All local health departments in North Carolina are mandated to provide a defined set of environmental health services, yet few have the tools to understand the costs incurred in delivering these services. The objectives of this study were to (1) derive cost estimates for 2 commonly provided environmental health services—food and lodging inspections and on-site water services—and (2) explore factors that drive variations in costs, focusing on the roles of economies of scale and scope. Using data from 15 local health departments in North Carolina, we found that costs varied substantially. A bivariate analysis found evidence of economies of scale: higher volumes of services were associated with lower costs per service. Providing a greater scope of services, however, was not consistently associated with reduced costs. In-depth cost data provide public health officials with key information when deciding how to best serve their communities.

Download Full-text

Identifying Needs for Advancing the Profession and Workforce in Environmental Health

American Journal of Public Health ◽

10.2105/ajph.2019.305441 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 110 (3) ◽

pp. 288-294 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Justin A. Gerding ◽

Bryan W. Brooks ◽

Elizabeth Landeen ◽

Sandra Whitehead ◽

Kaitlyn R. Kelly ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Focus Groups ◽

Environmental Health ◽

Workforce Development ◽

Specific Problem ◽

Local Health ◽

Health Departments ◽

Local Health Departments ◽

State Health ◽

Health Agencies ◽

Emerging Issues

An ever-changing landscape for environmental health (EH) requires in-depth assessment and analysis of the current challenges and emerging issues faced by EH professionals. The Understanding the Needs, Challenges, Opportunities, Vision, and Emerging Roles in Environmental Health initiative addressed this need. After receiving responses from more than 1700 practitioners, during an in-person workshop, focus groups identified and described priority problems and supplied context on addressing the significant challenges facing EH professionals with state health agencies and local health departments. The focus groups developed specific problem statements detailing the EH profession and workforce’s prevailing challenges and needs according to 6 themes, including effective leadership, workforce development, equipment and technology, information systems and data, garnering support, and partnerships and collaboration. We describe the identified priority problems and needs and provide recommendations for ensuring a strong and robust EH profession and workforce ready to address tomorrow’s challenges.

Download Full-text

The privatization of environmental health services: a national survey of practices and perspectives in local health departments

Public Health Reports ◽

10.1016/s0033-3549(04)50109-7 ◽

2002 ◽

Vol 117 (1) ◽

pp. 62-68 ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Christopher Keane ◽

John Marx ◽

Edmund Ricci

Keyword(s):

Health Services ◽

Environmental Health ◽

National Survey ◽

Local Health ◽

Health Departments ◽

Local Health Departments

Download Full-text

Demonstration Projects for State and Local Health Departments: HIV Rapid Testing to Improve Outcomes for Partner Counseling, Testing, and Referral Services (PCTRS)

PsycEXTRA Dataset ◽

10.1037/e412192005-001 ◽

2004 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Keyword(s):

Local Health ◽

Health Departments ◽

Rapid Testing ◽

Local Health Departments ◽

Hiv Rapid Testing ◽

State And Local

Download Full-text

Patterns of Cross-Sector Collaboration in Local Health Departments: A Cluster Analysis

Health Promotion Practice ◽

10.1177/1524839920972982 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 152483992097298

Author(s):

Alexis K. Grant

Keyword(s):

Public Health ◽

Cluster Analysis ◽

Determinants Of Health ◽

Local Health ◽

Health Departments ◽

Local Health Departments ◽

Structural Determinants ◽

Cluster Assignment ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Top Executive

Local health departments (LHDs) are positioned to act as the community health strategist for their catchment area, which requires cross-sector collaboration. However, little research exists to understand how much and what types of cross-sector collaboration occur and its impact on LHD practice. Data from 490 LHDs who participated in the 2016 National Profile of Local Health Departments survey were analyzed to identify patterns of cross-sector collaboration among LHDs. In the survey, LHDs reported the presence of collaborative activities for each of 22 categories of organizations. Factor analysis was used to identify patterns in the types of organizations with which LHDs collaborate. Then, cluster analysis was conducted to identify patterns in the types of cross-sector collaboration, and cross-sectional analyses examined which LHD characteristics were associated with cluster assignment. LHDs collaborated most with traditional health care–oriented organizations, but less often with organizations focused on upstream determinants of health such as housing. Three distinct clusters represented collaboration patterns in LHDs: coordinators, networkers, and low-collaborators. LHDs who were low-collaborators were more likely to serve smaller populations, be unaccredited, have a smaller workforce, have a White top executive, and have a top executive without a graduate degree. These findings imply that public health practitioners should prioritize building bridges to a variety of organizations and engage in collaboration beyond information sharing. Furthermore, LHDs should prioritize accreditation and workforce development activities for supporting cross-sector collaboration. With these investments, the public health system can better address the social and structural determinants of health and promote health equity.

Download Full-text

Actionable lessons for the US COVID vaccine program

Israel Journal of Health Policy Research ◽

10.1186/s13584-021-00452-2 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Gary L. Freed

Keyword(s):

Public Health ◽

Local Health ◽

National Strategy ◽

Individual State ◽

Health Departments ◽

Local Health Departments ◽

Public Health Infrastructure ◽

Health Infrastructure ◽

The Us ◽

Vaccine Distribution

AbstractWhen attempting to provide lessons for other countries from the successful Israeli COVID-19 vaccine experience, it is important to distinguish between the modifiable and non-modifiable components identified in the article by Rosen, et al. Two specific modifiable components included in the Israeli program from which the US can learn are (a) a national (not individual state-based) strategy for vaccine distribution and administration and (b) a functioning public health infrastructure. As a federal government, the US maintains an often complex web of state and national authorities and responsibilities. The federal government assumed responsibility for the ordering, payment and procurement of COVID vaccine from manufacturers. In designing the subsequent steps in their COVID-19 vaccine distribution and administration plan, the Trump administration decided to rely on the states themselves to determine how best to implement guidance provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). This strategy resulted in 50 different plans and 50 different systems for the dissemination of vaccine doses, all at the level of each individual state. State health departments were neither financed, experienced nor uniformly possessed the expertise to develop and implement such plans. A national strategy for the distribution, and the workforce for the provision, of vaccine beyond the state level, similar to that which occurred in Israel, would have provided for greater efficiency and coordination across the country. The US public health infrastructure was ill-prepared and ill-staffed to take on the responsibility to deliver > 450 million doses of vaccine in an expeditious fashion, even if supply of vaccine was available. The failure to adequately invest in public health has been ubiquitous across the nation at all levels of government. Since the 2008 recession, state and local health departments have lost > 38,000 jobs and spending for state public health departments has dropped by 16% per capita and spending for local health departments has fallen by 18%. Hopefully, COVID-19 will be a wakeup call to the US with regard to the need for both a national strategy to address public health emergencies and the well-maintained infrastructure to make it happen.

Download Full-text