Discussion: Long-Term Skeletal Stability after Maxillary Advancement with Distraction Osteogenesis Using a Rigid External Distraction Device in Cleft Maxillary Deformities

Author(s):  
Barry H. Grayson
2008 ◽  
Vol 66 (9) ◽  
pp. 1833-1846 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahiro Kanno ◽  
Masaharu Mitsugi ◽  
Michi Hosoe ◽  
Shintaro Sukegawa ◽  
Kensuke Yamauchi ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 1115-1122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Humam Saltaji ◽  
Michael P. Major ◽  
Mostafa Altalibi ◽  
Mohamed Youssef ◽  
Carlos Flores-Mir

2007 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 274-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiung-Shing Huang ◽  
Pandurangan Harikrishnan ◽  
Yu-Fang Liao ◽  
Ellen W. C. Ko ◽  
Eric J. W. Liou ◽  
...  

Objective: To evaluate the changes in maxillary position after maxillary distraction osteogenesis in six growing children with cleft lip and palate. Design: Retrospective, longitudinal study on maxillary changes at A point, anterior nasal spine, posterior nasal spine, central incisor, and first molar. Setting: The University Hospital Craniofacial Center. Main Outcome Measure: Cephalometric radiographs were used to measure the maxillary position immediately after distraction, at 6 months, and more than 1 year after distraction. Results: After maxillary distraction with a rigid external distraction device, the maxilla (A point) on average moved forward 9.7 mm and downward 3.5 mm immediately after distraction, moved backward 0.9 mm and upward 2.0 mm after 6 months postoperatively, and then moved further backward 2.3 mm and downward 6.8 mm after more than 1 year from the predistraction position. Conclusion: In most cases, maxilla moved forward at distraction and started to move backward until 1 year after distraction, but remained forward, as compared with predistraction position. Maxilla also moved downward during distraction and upward in 6 months, but started descending in 1 year. There also was no further forward growth of the maxilla after distraction in growing children with clefts.


2021 ◽  
pp. 105566562110056
Author(s):  
Wei-Ling Gao ◽  
Yi-Hao Lee ◽  
Chi-Yu Tsai ◽  
Te-Ju Wu ◽  
Jui-Pin Lai ◽  
...  

Objective: To evaluate the long-term stability of LeFort I osteotomy followed by distraction osteogenesis with a transcutaneous rigid external device for the treatment of severe maxillary hypoplasia in patients with cleft lip and palate. Patients and Methods: Nine patients with cleft lip and palate underwent rigid external distraction after a LeFort I osteotomy for maxillary advancement. Lateral cephalometric films were analyzed for assessment of treatment outcome and stability in 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year after distraction. Results: Significant maxillary advancement was observed in the horizontal direction, with the anterior nasal spine (ANS) distance of the maxilla increasing by an average of 20.5 ± 5.1 mm after distraction. The ANS relapse rates in 6 months and 1 year were 8.7% and 12.8%, respectively. The mean inclination of upper incisors to the palatal plane was almost unchanged (before: 109.8° ± 6.6°; after: 108.9° ± 7.5°). The movement ratios at the nasal tip/ANS, soft tissue A point/A point, and the upper vermilion border/upper incisor edge were 0.36:1, 0.72:1, and 0.83:1, respectively. Conclusion: Considerable maxillary advancement was achieved with less change of incisors inclination after distraction. Moreover, the relapse rate after 1 year was minimal. The concave facial profile was improved as well as the facial balance and aesthetics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document