Relationship between Chest Port Catheter Tip Position and Port Malfunction after Interventional Radiologic Placement

2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 581-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob C.L. Schutz ◽  
Aalpen A. Patel ◽  
Timothy W.I. Clark ◽  
Jeffrey A. Solomon ◽  
David B. Freiman ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mina S Makary ◽  
Alexander Lionberg ◽  
Mamdouh Khayat ◽  
Maryam B Lustberg ◽  
Jamal AlTaani ◽  
...  

Purpose Catheter-tip associated thrombosis is not uncommon in patients with implantable central venous ports; however, the prevalence and clinical impact of this complication on patient management is unclear. This study aims to identify risk factors for thrombus formation in a large population receiving serial echocardiograms (echo) following port placement. Methods A total of 396 female breast cancer patients underwent internal jugular vein chest port placement between 2007 and 2013 and received echo studies every third month. Catheter tip position was measured from chest radiography and catheter associated thrombus was identified by echo. Results Sixteen out of 396 patients (4%) had catheter-tip thrombus. No patients were symptomatic or prophylactically anticoagulated. Patients with thrombus were significantly younger than those without (46.4 years versus 53.4 years, respectively, p = 0.02) and had higher stage breast cancer with 75% versus 44.7% having stage III or IV cancer ( p = 0.017). Thrombus was identified after a median of 91 days. No significant difference was identified in anatomic ( p = 0.1) or measured ( p = 0.15) tip position, port laterality ( p = 0.86), or number of port lumens ( p = 0.65). Conclusions In this large cohort, younger patients and those with more advanced stage breast cancer were more associated with catheter-tip-related thrombus after port placement.


1962 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. L. Loomis Bell ◽  
William F. Haynes ◽  
Seiichi Shimomura ◽  
Donald P. Dallas
Keyword(s):  

2001 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 316-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Stas ◽  
S. Mulier ◽  
P. Pattyn ◽  
J. Vijgen ◽  
I. De Wever
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 112-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell Hostetter ◽  
Nadine Nakasawa ◽  
Kim Tompkins ◽  
Bradley Hill

Abstract Background: Long term venous catheters have been used to deliver specialized therapies since 1968. The ideal tip position of a central venous catheter provides reliable venous access with optimal therapeutic delivery, while minimizing short-and long-term complications. Ideal position limits have evolved and narrowed over time, making successful placement difficult and unreliable when depending exclusively on the landmark technique. Objective: To review and analyze contemporary literature and calculate an overall accuracy rate for first attempt placement of a PICC catheter in the ideal tip position. Methods: Key PICC placement terms were used to search the database PubMED-indexed for MEDLINE in June and October, 2009. The selection of studies required: a patient cohort without tip placement guidance technology; a documented landmark technique to place catheter tips; data documenting initial catheter placement and, that the lower third of the SVC and the cavo-atrial junction (CAJ) were included in the placement criteria. With few exceptions, articles written between 1993 and 2009 met the stated selection criteria. A composite of outcomes associated with tip placement was analyzed, and an overall percent proficiency of accurate catheter tip placement calculated. Results: Nine studies in eight articles met the selection criteria and were included for analysis. Rates of first placement success per study ranged from 39% to 75%, with the majority (7/9) being single center studies. The combined overall proficiency of these studies calculated as a weighted average was 45.87%.


2003 ◽  
Vol 50 (9) ◽  
pp. 963-963
Author(s):  
René Martin ◽  
Martine Pirlet ◽  
Michel Parent ◽  
France Gingras

Author(s):  
Philip V. Theodosopoulos ◽  
Aviva Abosch ◽  
Michael W. McDermott

ABSTRACT:Objective:Ventricular catheter placement is a common neurosurgical procedure often resulting in inaccurate intraventricular positioning. We conducted a comparison of the accuracy of endoscopic and conventional ventricular catheter placement in adults.Methods:A retrospective analysis of data was performed on 37 consecutive patients undergoing ventriculo-peritoneal shunt (VPS) insertion with endoscopy and 40 randomly selected, unmatched patients undergoing VPS insertion without endoscopy, for the treatment of hydrocephalus of varied etiology. A grading system for catheter tip position was developed consisting of five intraventricular zones, V1-V5, and three intraparenchymal zones, A, B, C. Zones V1 for the frontal approaches and V1 or V2 for the occipital approaches were the optimal catheter tip locations. Postoperative scans of each patient were used to grade the accuracy of ventricular catheter placement.Results:Seventy-six percent of all endoscopic ventricular catheters were in zone V1 and 100% were within zones V1-V3. No endoscopically inserted catheters were observed in zones V4, V5 or intraparenchymally. Thirty-eight percent of the conventionally placed catheters were in zone V1, 53% in zones V1-3 and 15% intraparenchymally. There was a statistically significant difference in the percentage of catheters in optimal location versus in any other location, favoring endoscopic guidance (p<0.001).Conclusion:We conclude that endoscopic ventricular catheter placement provides improved positioning accuracy than conventional techniques.


1988 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 613-614 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Pithie ◽  
JS Soutar ◽  
CR Pennington

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document