Prediabetic Living Kidney Donors Have Preserved Kidney Function at 10 Years After Donation

2014 ◽  
Vol 97 (7) ◽  
pp. 748-754 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sindhu Chandran ◽  
Umesh Masharani ◽  
Allison B. Webber ◽  
David M. Wojciechowski
2016 ◽  
Vol 207 (5) ◽  
pp. 1022-1030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eli Eikefjord ◽  
Erling Andersen ◽  
Erlend Hodneland ◽  
Einar Svarstad ◽  
Arvid Lundervold ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 71 (10) ◽  
pp. 1077 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.K. Wan ◽  
E. Spalding ◽  
D. Winch ◽  
K. Brown ◽  
C.C. Geddes

2018 ◽  
Vol 102 (11) ◽  
pp. e462-e463 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Gaillard ◽  
Olivier Gribouval ◽  
Marie Courbebaisse ◽  
Catherine Fournier ◽  
Corinne Antignac ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 1590-1596
Author(s):  
M. Kwapisz ◽  
R. Kieszek ◽  
K. Jędrzejko ◽  
M. Bieniasz ◽  
J. Gozdowska ◽  
...  

Kidney360 ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 10.34067/KID.0003052021
Author(s):  
Neetika Garg ◽  
Emilio D. Poggio ◽  
Didier Mandelbrot

Living kidney donors incur a small increased risk of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), of which pre-donation glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is an important determinant. As a result, kidney function assessment is central to the donor candidate evaluation and selection process. This article reviews the different methods of GFR assessment including estimated GFR, creatinine clearance and measured GFR, and the current guidelines on GFR thresholds for donor acceptance. Estimated GFR obtained using the 2009 Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation, while the best of estimating estimations, tends to underestimate and has limited accuracy, especially near normal GFR values. In the United States, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network policy on living donation mandates either measured GFR or creatinine clearance as part of evaluation. Measured GFR is considered the gold standard, although there is some variation in performance characteristics depending on the marker and technique used. Major limitations of creatinine clearance are dependency on accuracy of timed collection, and overestimation as a result of distal tubular creatinine secretion. GFR declines with healthy aging, and most international guidelines recommend use of age-adapted selection criteria. The 2017 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Guideline for the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors diverges from other guidelines and recommends using absolute cut-off of <60 ml/min/1.73m2 for exclusion and of ≥90 ml/min/1.73m2 for acceptance, and determination of candidacy with intermediate GFR based on long-term ESKD risk. However, several concerns for this strategy exist, including inappropriate acceptance of younger candidates due to underestimation of risk, and exclusion of older candidates whose kidney function is in fact appropriate for age. Role of cystatin C and other newer biomarkers, as well as data on impact of pre-donation GFR on not just ESKD risk but also advanced chronic kidney disease risk and cardiovascular outcomes are needed.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang Hun Eum ◽  
Hanbi Lee ◽  
Eun Jeong Ko ◽  
Hyuk Jin Cho ◽  
Chul Woo Yang ◽  
...  

Abstract Computed tomography (CT) and nuclear renography are used to determine kidney procurement in living kidney donors (LKDs). The present study investigated which modality better predicts kidney function after donation. This study included 835 LKDs and they were divided into two subgroups based on whether the left-right dominance of kidney volume was concordant with kidney function (concordant group) or not (discordant group). The predictive value for post-donation kidney function between the two imaging modalities was compared at 1 month, 6 months, and > 1 year in total cohort, concordant, and discordant groups. Split kidney function (SKF) measured by both modalities showed significant correlation with each other at baseline. SKFs of remaining kidney measured using both modalities before donation showed significant correlation with eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate) after donation in the total cohort group and two subgroups, respectively. CT volumetry was superior to nuclear renography for predicting post-donation kidney function in the total cohort group and both subgroups. In the discordant subgroup, a higher tendency of kidney function recovery was observed when kidney procurement was determined based on CT volumetry. In conclusion, CT volumetry is preferred when determining procurement strategy especially when discordance is found between the two imaging modalities.


2001 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 444-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingela Fehrman-Ekholm ◽  
Fredrik Dun??r ◽  
Bo Brink ◽  
Gunnar Tyd??n ◽  
Carl-Gustaf Elinder

1976 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Edgren ◽  
L. Laasonen ◽  
B. Kock ◽  
J. W. Brotherus ◽  
A. Pasternack ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nidhi Aggarwal ◽  
Anna C. Porter ◽  
Ignatius Y. S. Tang ◽  
Bryan N. Becker ◽  
Sanjeev K. Akkina

Accurate assessment of kidney function by measurement of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is essential to the risk assessment of prospective living kidney donors. We evaluated the performance of various estimating equations for creatinine clearance (Cockcroft-Gault), GFR (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration), and 24-hour urine collections for creatinine clearance in obese potential kidney donors. We evaluated 164 potential kidney donors including 49 with a BMI of 30–35 and 32 with a BMI >35 that have completed a routine living donor evaluation with a measured GFR. All the estimating equations performed poorly in obese donors. While 24-hour urine collections performed better, only 15% had an adequate 24-hour urine collection. Since obese kidney donors may be at higher than average risk for kidney failure, accurate assessment of kidney function in these donors is crucial to ensure their long-term health postdonation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document