The Impact of Senior Medical Studentsʼ Personal Difficulties on Their Communication Patterns in Breaking Bad News

2009 ◽  
Vol 84 (11) ◽  
pp. 1582-1594 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dafna Meitar ◽  
Orit Karnieli-Miller ◽  
Shmuel Eidelman
2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (10) ◽  
pp. 605-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jill Thistlethwaite

Bad or unfavorable news may be defined as ‘any news that drastically and negatively alters the patient's view of her or his future’( Buckman 1992 ). When GPs talk about breaking bad news, they usually mean telling patients that they have cancer, though in fact similar communication skills may be employed when informing patients about a positive human immunodeficiency virus status, or that a relative has died. Of key importance in the process is the doctor gaining an understanding of what the patient's view of the future is or was — the expectation that now might not be met. A doctor should not assume the impact of the diagnosis without exploring the patient's worldview.


2014 ◽  
Vol 99 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A18.3-A19
Author(s):  
D Nuzum ◽  
S Meaney ◽  
K O’Donoghue

Author(s):  
Maria Setubal ◽  
Andrea Gonçalves ◽  
Sheyla Rocha ◽  
Eliana Amaral

Objective Resident doctors usually face the task to communicate bad news in perinatology without any formal training. The impact on parents can be disastrous. The objective of this paper is to analyze the perception of residents regarding a training program in communicating bad news in perinatology based on video reviews and setting, perception, invitation, knowledge, emotion, and summary (SPIKES) strategy. Methods We performed the analysis of complementary data collected from participants in a randomized controlled intervention study to evaluate the efficacy of a training program on improving residents' skills to communicate bad news. Data were collected using a Likert scale. Through a thematic content analysis we tried to to apprehend the meanings, feelings and experiences expressed by resident doctors in their comments as a response to an open-ended question. Half of the group received training, consisting of discussions of video reviews of participants' simulated encounters communicating a perinatal loss to a “mother” based on the SPIKES strategy. We also offered training sessions to the control group after they completed participation. Twenty-eight residents who were randomized to intervention and 16 from the control group received training. Twenty written comments were analyzed. Results The majority of the residents evaluated training highly as an education activity to help increase knowledge, ability and understanding about breaking bad news in perinatology. Three big categories emerged from residents' comments: SPIKES training effects; bad news communication in medical training; and doctors' feelings and relationship with patients. Conclusions Residents took SPIKES training as a guide to systematize the communication of bad news and to amplify perceptions of the emotional needs of the patients. They suggested the insertion of a similar training in their residency programs curricula.


MedEdPublish ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne Brouwers ◽  
Anne De la Croix ◽  
Roland Laan ◽  
Chris Van Weel ◽  
Evelyn Van Weel-Baumgarten

2001 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Dosanjh ◽  
Judy Barnes ◽  
Mohit Bhandari

2004 ◽  
Vol 5 (03) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Herrmann ◽  
H Ortwein ◽  
A Klambeck ◽  
C Schwarz ◽  
J Schildmann

1992 ◽  
Vol 157 (9) ◽  
pp. 615-621 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodger C Charlton

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document