Analysis of Goal-directed Fluid Therapy and Patient Monitoring in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery

2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 21-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy D. Quinn ◽  
Ethan Y. Brovman ◽  
Richard D. Urman
Keyword(s):  
Fluid Therapy ◽  
Patient Monitoring ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Goal Directed Fluid Therapy

Goal-directed Fluid Therapy Does Not Reduce Primary Postoperative Ileus after Elective Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

2017 ◽  
Vol 127 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan C. Gómez-Izquierdo ◽  
Alessandro Trainito ◽  
David Mirzakandov ◽  
Barry L. Stein ◽  
Sender Liberman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Fluid Therapy ◽  
Postoperative Ileus ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Therapy Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Goal Directed Fluid Therapy ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Inadequate perioperative fluid therapy impairs gastrointestinal function. Studies primarily evaluating the impact of goal-directed fluid therapy on primary postoperative ileus are missing. The objective of this study was to determine whether goal-directed fluid therapy reduces the incidence of primary postoperative ileus after laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program. Methods Randomized patient and assessor-blind controlled trial conducted in adult patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program. Patients were assigned randomly to receive intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy (goal-directed fluid therapy group) or fluid therapy based on traditional principles (control group). Primary postoperative ileus was the primary outcome. Results One hundred twenty-eight patients were included and analyzed (goal-directed fluid therapy group: n = 64; control group: n = 64). The incidence of primary postoperative ileus was 22% in the goal-directed fluid therapy and 22% in the control group (relative risk, 1; 95% CI, 0.5 to 1.9; P = 1.00). Intraoperatively, patients in the goal-directed fluid therapy group received less intravenous fluids (mainly less crystalloids) but a greater volume of colloids. The increase of stroke volume and cardiac output was more pronounced and sustained in the goal-directed fluid therapy group. Length of hospital stay, 30-day postoperative morbidity, and mortality were not different. Conclusions Intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy compared with fluid therapy based on traditional principles does not reduce primary postoperative ileus in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the context of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program. Its previously demonstrated benefits might have been offset by advancements in perioperative care.

scholarly journals A Randomised Controlled Trial of Fluid Restriction Compared to Oesophageal Doppler-Guided Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy in Elective Major Colorectal Surgery within an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Program

2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 752-760 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. D. Phan ◽  
V. An ◽  
B. D'Souza ◽  
M. J. Rattray ◽  
M. J. Johnston ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Fluid Therapy ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Goal Directed Therapy ◽  
Major Complications ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Goal Directed Fluid Therapy

There is continued controversy regarding the benefits of goal-directed fluid therapy, with earlier studies showing marked improvement in morbidity and length-of-stay that have not been replicated more recently. The aim of this study was to compare patient outcomes in elective colorectal surgery patients having goal-directed versus restrictive fluid therapy. Inclusion criteria included suitability for an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery care pathway and patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status score of 1 to 3. Patients were intraoperatively randomised to either restrictive or Doppler-guided goal-directed fluid therapy. The primary outcome was length-of-stay; secondary outcomes included complication rate, change in haemodynamic variables and fluid volumes. One hundred patients, 50 in each group, were included in the analysis. Compared to restrictive therapy, goal-directed therapy resulted in a greater volume of intraoperative fluid, 2115 (interquartile range 1350 to 2560) ml versus 1500 (1200 to 2000) ml, P=0.008, and was associated with an increase in Doppler-derived stroke volume index from beginning to end of surgery, 43.7 (16.3) to 54.2 (21.1) ml/m2, P <0.001, in the latter group. Length-of-stay was similar, P=0.421. The number of patients with any complication (minor or major) was similar; 60% (30) versus 52% (26), P=0.42, or major complications, 1 (2%) versus 4 (8%), P=0.36, respectively. The increased perioperative fluid volumes and increased stroke volumes at the end of surgery in patients receiving goal-directed therapy did not translate to a significant difference in length-of-stay and we did not observe a difference in the number of patients experiencing minor or major complications.

Is goal-directed fluid therapy beneficial for gastrointestinal surgery within an enhanced recovery program? A systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Fluid Therapy ◽  
Postoperative Ileus ◽  
Postoperative Morbidity ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Gastrointestinal Surgery ◽  
Postoperative Mortality ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Anastomotic Leaks ◽  
Goal Directed Fluid Therapy

Objectives: To systematically evaluate the clinical effect of intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) in gastrointestinal surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program. Methods: EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, PubMed, OVID, CNKI and other databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from the inception dates to December 2018. These studies included patients undergoing elective gastrointestinal surgery comparing regular fluid therapy versus GDFT within ERAS. The meta-analysis was carried on with RevMan 5.3. Results: A total of 10 RCT studies were included with 1216 patients. Compared with the regular fluid therapy group, the GDFT group reduced the rate of readmission [odds ratio, OR = 1.67, 95% CI (1.05, 2.65), P = 0.03] in gastrointestinal surgery patients within ERAS. However, there was no significant decrease in length of hospital stay (LOHS) [mean difference, MD = -0.11, 95% CI (-1.22, 1.00), P = 0.85], postoperative morbidity [OR = 0.78, 95% CI (0.55, 1.11), P = 0.17], postoperative mortality [OR = 0.86, 95% CI (0.30, 2.49), P = 0.78], postoperative ileus [OR = 1.24, 95% CI (0.70, 2.19), P = 0.45], anastomotic leaks [OR= 0.66, 95% CI (0.29, 1.49), P = 0.31] and the first gastrointestinal motility time [MD = -0.37, 95% CI (-1.07, 0.33), P = 0.30]. Conclusions: The current evidence demonstrates that, in gastrointestinal surgery within ERAS, GDFT decreased the rate of readmission. However, there was no advantage over regular fluid therapy in the reduction of LOHS, postoperative morbidity, postoperative mortality, postoperative ileus and anastomotic leaks.

scholarly journals Perioperative Fluid Management in the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Pathway

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (02) ◽  
pp. 114-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alyssa Zhu ◽  
Xiaodong Bao ◽  
Aalok Agarwala
Keyword(s):  
Fluid Therapy ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Fluid Management ◽  
Mechanical Bowel Preparation ◽  
Oral Intake ◽  
Perioperative Period ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Individualized Approach

AbstractFluid management is an essential component of the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) pathway. Optimal management begins in the preoperative period and continues through the intraoperative and postoperative phases. In this review, we outline current evidence-based practices for fluid management through each phase of the perioperative period. Preoperatively, patients should be encouraged to hydrate until 2 hours prior to the induction of anesthesia with a carbohydrate-containing clear liquid. When mechanical bowel preparation is necessary, with modern isoosmotic solutions, fluid repletion is not necessary. Intraoperatively, fluid therapy should aim to maintain euvolemia with an individualized approach. While some patients may benefit from goal-directed fluid therapy, a restrictive, zero-balance approach to intraoperative fluid management may be reasonable. Postoperatively, early initiation of oral intake and cessation of intravenous therapy are recommended.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document