Floating hip with floating acetabulum and bilateral pelvis fractures

2022 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Wael Salama ◽  
Hossam Hosny
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 1128-1135
Author(s):  
Ritwika Nandi ◽  
Mahboobur Rahman ◽  
Abhash Kumar ◽  
Sanjay Kumar ◽  
Sujit Narayan Nandi

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 264-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley C. Dodd ◽  
Nikita Lakomkin ◽  
Catherine Bulka ◽  
Rachel Thakore ◽  
Cory A. Collinge ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. McLachlin ◽  
M. Lesieur ◽  
D. Stephen ◽  
H. Kreder ◽  
C. Whyne

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-124
Author(s):  
Iulian Slavu ◽  
Adrian Tulin ◽  
Bogdan Socea ◽  
Vlad Braga ◽  
Lucian Alecu

AbstractIntroduction: Pelvis fractures that associate bleeding with hemodynamic instability warrant immediate treatment. The therapeutic options in these cases vary from angioembolization to extraperitoneal pelvic packing.Material and method: The P.I.C.O.S guidelines were used to structure the questions and the research topic as to attain clinical validity. The results of the research were filtered in accordance with the PRISMA checklist.Results: 38 papers were identified. After screening, 27 papers were used to complete the analysis.Discussion: Frequently, bleeding has a venous source in the pelvis. In the case of pelvic fractures with hemodynamic instability, extraperitoneal pelvic packing is one of the core treatments but not a stand-alone treatment, as it needs to be coupled with a pro-efficient trauma resuscitation protocol. Its intended use is as a bridge therapy until conclusive investigations regarding the place of bleeding can be obtained. Angiography is recommended if hemodynamic instability exists after pelvic packing and effective hemodynamic resuscitation.Conclusion: Even with all these recent efforts, the wide-use of this therapy is precluded due to the absence of a standardized evaluation of these patients and large multicentric studies.


2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
AlokC. Agrawal ◽  
RoopBhushan Kalia

Author(s):  
Fuziansyah BACHTAR ◽  
Xian CHEN ◽  
Toshiaki HISADA ◽  
Kunio SAIKI ◽  
Shigeru HIRABAYASHI ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 70-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Beckmann ◽  
Justin M. Haller ◽  
Michael Beebe ◽  
Ashley Ali ◽  
Angela Presson ◽  
...  

F1000Research ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean T. Burns ◽  
Zbigniew Gugala ◽  
Carlos J. Jimenez ◽  
William J. Mileski ◽  
Ronald W. Lindsey

Introduction: Motorcycles have become an increasingly popular mode of transportation despite their association with a greater risk for injury compared with automobiles. Whereas the recent incidence of annual passenger vehicle fatalities in the United States of America (USA) has progressively declined, motorcycle fatalities have steadily increased in the past 11 years. Although motorcycle injuries (MIs) have been studied, to the author’s knowledge there are no published reports on MIs in the USA during this 11-year period.Methods: Study data were derived from a prospectively collected Level I trauma center database. Data sampling included motorcycle crash injury evaluations for the 10-year period ending on 31 August 2008. This retrospective analysis included patient demographic and medical data, helmet use, Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score, injury severity score (ISS), length of hospital stay (LOS), specific injury diagnosis, and death. Data statistics were analyzed using the Spearman correlation coefficient, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and logistic regression.Results: The study identified 1252 motorcycle crash injuries. Helmets were worn by 40.7% of patients for which helmet data were available. The rates of the most common orthopedic injuries were tibia/fibula (19.01%), spine (16.21%), and forearm (10.14%) fractures. The most common non-orthopedic motorcycle crash injuries were concussions (21.09%), skull fractures (8.23%), face fractures (13.66%), and hemo- and pneumothorax (8.79%). There was a significant correlation between greater age and higher ISS (r=0.21, P<0.0001) and longer LOS (r=0.22, P<0.0001). Older patients were also less likely to wear a helmet (OR=0.99, 95% CI: 0.98, 0.997), associated with a significantly higher risk for death (after adjustment for helmet use OR=1.03, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.05). All patients without helmets had a significantly lower GCS score (P=0.0001) and a higher mortality rate (after adjustment for patient demographic data OR=2.28, 95% CI: 1.13, 4.58). Conclusion: Compared with historical reports, the prevalence of skull, face, spine, and pelvis fractures have increased in American motorcycle crashes. Compared to recent European studies, the incidence of USA skull and face fractures is much higher, while the incidence of USA spine and pelvis fractures is more comparable; however, this is not associated with increased in-hospital mortality.


2011 ◽  
Vol 71 (supplement) ◽  
pp. S58-S61 ◽  
Author(s):  
James R. Bailey ◽  
Daniel J. Stinner ◽  
Lorne H. Blackbourne ◽  
Joseph R. Hsu ◽  
Michael T. Mazurek
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document