scholarly journals Molecular Profiling of Clear Cell Ovarian Cancers: Identifying Potential Treatment Targets for Clinical Trials

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 648-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael L. Friedlander ◽  
Kenneth Russell ◽  
Sherri Millis ◽  
Zoran Gatalica ◽  
Ryan Bender ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Therapeutic Targets ◽  
Mtor Pathway ◽  
Receptor Expression ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Ovarian Cancers ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy ◽  
Generation Sequencing

BackgroundAdvanced stage/recurrent clear cell ovarian cancers (CCOCs) are characterized by a low response to chemotherapy and a poor prognosis. There is growing interest in investigating novel/molecular targeted therapies in patients with CCOC in histotype-specific trials. However, CCOCs are not a uniform entity and comprise a number of molecular subtypes and it is unlikely that a single approach to treatment will be appropriate for all patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the results of a multiplatform profiling panel in CCOCs to identify potential therapeutic targets.Patients and MethodsTumor profiling was performed on 521 CCOCs. They were grouped into pure (n = 422) and mixed (n = 99) CCOC for analysis. Testing included a combination of DNA sequencing (including next-generation sequencing) using a 46-gene panel, immunohistochemistry, fluorescent or chromogenic in situ hybridization, and RNA fragment analysis.ResultsThe most common findings were in the PIK3CA/Akt/mTOR pathway, with 61% of all CCOCs showing a molecular alteration in one of these pathway components. Next-generation sequencing revealed PIK3CA mutations in 50% of pure CCOCs. Significant differences were observed between pure and mixed CCOCs with respect to hormone receptor expression (9% vs 34.7% for ER, 13.45 vs 26.4% for PR), cMET (24.1% vs 11.6%), PD-1 tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (48.1% vs 100%), expression of PD-L1 (7.4% vs 25%), and TOPO1 (41% vs 27.1%) on immunohistochemistry, whereas next-generation sequencing revealed significant differences in mutation frequency in PIK3CA (50% vs 18.5%), TP53 (18.1% vs 57.7%), KRAS (12.4% vs 3.7%), and cMET (1.9% vs 11.1%).ConclusionsThis large study confirms that the PIK3CA/Akt/mTOR pathway is commonly altered in CCOCs, and highlights the significant differences between pure and mixed CCOCs. Clear cell ovarian cancers are molecularly heterogeneous and there are a number of potential therapeutic targets which could be tested in clinical trials.

Novel Next-Generation Sequencing and Networks-Based Therapeutic Targets: Realistic and More Effective Drug Design and Discovery

2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitrios Roukos ◽  
Giannis Baltogiannis ◽  
Christos Katsouras ◽  
Aris Bechlioulis ◽  
Katerina Naka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Drug Design ◽  
Therapeutic Targets ◽  
Effective Drug ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Generation Sequencing

scholarly journals PATH-03. CLINICAL UTILITY OF NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING IN IDH-WILDTYPE GLIOBLASTOMA: THE DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE EXPERIENCE

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii164-ii164
Author(s):  
Mary Jane Lim-Fat ◽  
Gilbert Youssef ◽  
Mehdi Touat ◽  
Bryan Iorgulescu ◽  
Eleanor Woodward ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Single Nucleotide Variants ◽  
Dana Farber Cancer Institute ◽  
Clinical Records ◽  
Ngs Data ◽  
Generation Sequencing

Abstract BACKGROUND Comprehensive next generation sequencing (NGS) is available through many academic institutions and commercial entities, and is incorporated in practice guidelines for glioblastoma (GBM). We retrospective evaluated the practice patterns and utility of incorporating NGS data into routine care of GBM patients at a clinical trials-focused academic center. METHODS We identified 1,011 consecutive adult patients with histologically confirmed GBM with OncoPanel testing, a targeted exome NGS platform of 447 cancer-associated genes at Dana Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI), from 2013-2019. We selected and retrospectively reviewed clinical records of all IDH-wildtype GBM patients treated at DFCI. RESULTS We identified 557 GBM IDH-wildtype patients, of which 227 were male (40.7%). OncoPanel testing revealed 833 single nucleotide variants and indels in 44 therapeutically relevant genes (Tier 1 or 2 mutations) including PIK3CA (n=51), BRAF (n=9), FGFR1 (n=8), MSH2 (n=4), MSH6 (n=2) and MLH1 (n=1). Copy number analysis revealed 509 alterations in 18 therapeutically relevant genes including EGFR amplification (n= 186), PDGFRA amplification (N=39) and CDKN2A/2B homozygous loss (N=223). Median overall survival was 17.5 months for the whole cohort. Seventy-four therapeutic clinical trials accrued 144 patients in the upfront setting (25.9%) and 203 patients (36.4%) at recurrence. Altogether, NGS data for 107 patients (19.2%) were utilized for clinical trial enrollment or targeted therapy indications. High mutational burden (>17mutations/Mb) was identified in 11/464 samples (2.4%); of whom 3/11 received immune checkpoint blockade. Four patients received compassionate use therapy targeting EGFRvIII (rindopepimut, n=2), CKD4/6 (abemaciclib, n=1) and BRAFV600E (dabrafenib/trametinib, n=1). CONCLUSION While NGS has greatly improved diagnosis and molecular classification, we highlight that NGS remains underutilized in selecting therapy in GBM, even in a setting where clinical trials and off-label therapies are relatively accessible. Continued efforts to develop better targeted therapies and efficient clinical trial design are required to maximize the potential benefits of genomically-stratified data.

scholarly journals P14.127 From next generation sequencing and comparative genomic hybridization to personalised medicine for adult primary brain tumors: the profiler trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii99-iii99
Author(s):  
A Bonneville-levard ◽  
D Frappaz ◽  
D Pissaloux ◽  
Q Wang ◽  
D Perol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Brain Tumors ◽  
Comparative Genomic Hybridization ◽  
Comparative Genomic ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Genomic Hybridization ◽  
Primary Brain Tumors ◽  
Generation Sequencing

Abstract BACKGROUND Personalized anti-tumoral therapies may currently be proposed on the basis of immuno-histochemistry, but also next-generation sequencing and comparative genomic hybridization. ProfiLER trial explored the feasibility, efficacy and the impact of molecular profiling for patients with solid or hematological advanced cancers including brain tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with primary brain tumors, pre-treated with at least one line of anti-cancer treatment, could be included in this multicentric prospective trial. A molecular profile (next-generation sequencing and comparative genomic hydridization) was established on fresh or archived sample. Weekly molecular tumor board analysed results to propose as far as possible a molecular targeted therapy. RESULTS between February 2013 and December 2015, 141 patients with primary brain tumor were enrolled. One hundred five samples were further analyzed as 30 samples were excluded, and 6 are on-going. The rate of screen failure was 16/33 for stereotactic biopsy (49%) versus 11/104 (11%) for removal. The main representative histologic type of tumors were glioblastoma (n=46, 43,8%), low grade glioma (n=26, 24,8%), high grade glioma (n=12, 11,4%) and atypical and anaplastic meningioma (n=8, 7,6%). Median delay between the diagnostic of the primitive tumor and the inclusion in ProfiLER study was 2.7 years (0.2 - 29 years). Median delay between the consent and the results of the multidisciplinary meeting was 2.8 months (1–7.1 months). Forty-three patients (41%) presented at least one “druggable molecular alteration”. The most frequently altered genes were CDKN2A (n=18, 29%), EGFR (n=12, 20%), PDGFRa (n=8, 13%), PTEN (n=8, 13%), CDK4 (n=7, 11%), KIT (n=6, 10%), PIK3CA (n=5, 8%), MDM2 (n=3, 5%). Sixteen patients could not have a proposition of specific treatment due to death before MBT (n=5, 31.3%), lack of available clinical trials (n=9, 56%), or ambiguous results (n=2, 12.5%). Among the 27 patients (26%) for whom a specific therapy has been proposed, only six patients ultimately received a medical targeted therapy (everolimus n=3, erlotinib n=1, ruloxitinib n=1, sorafenib n=1). Four patients discontinued the treatment for toxicity, the 2 others for clinical progression. CONCLUSION routine high-throughput sequencing is feasible for brain tumors but delays should be reduced to be able to propose targeted therapies to patients fit enough to benefit from experimental treatment. Macroscopic surgery is the best way to obtain workable samples. Specific panel genes for neurologic tumors should be developed, as well as change of practices concerning exclusion criteria in clinical trials.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document