Role of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Literature Review

2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 801-806 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julián Di Guilmi ◽  
Gloria Salvo ◽  
Reza Mehran ◽  
Anil K. Sood ◽  
Robert L. Coleman ◽  
...  

AbstractTools that accurately predict the presence of metastatic ovarian cancer in the pleura are limited. Thus, we sought to summarize the current literature on video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and its applicability in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. A total of 187 patients with suspected ovarian cancer who underwent the VATS procedure were identified for this analysis. The median patient age was 59.4 years (range, 20.3–83 years). The median operative time for VATS was 32 minutes (range, 5–65 minutes). In 89 patients (48%), VATS revealed macroscopic disease in the pleural cavity. After VATS, 44 patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the remaining 143 patients underwent primary cytoreductive surgery. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery led to a change in disease stage or management in 76 patients (41%). Among patients with pleural effusions, VATS revealed pleural disease in 57% of patients, and 73% of patients with positive pleural cytology had evidence of pleural disease at the time of VATS. In addition, 23.5% of patients with negative pleural cytology had evidence of pleural disease at the time of VATS. Prospective trials are needed to accurately evaluate the impact of VATS on disease-free and overall survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery can help determine which patients are ideal candidates for surgical cytoreduction.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Conde Adán ◽  
S Alonso Salvador ◽  
M Fernandez Chereguini ◽  
C Yelo Docio ◽  
R Moreno Valsalobre ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Bouros ◽  
K.M. Antoniou ◽  
G. Chalkiadakis ◽  
J. Drositis ◽  
I. Petrakis ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 569-575
Author(s):  
Zenon Pogorelić ◽  
Ružica Gudelj ◽  
Dora Bjelanović ◽  
Miro Jukić ◽  
Sara Elezović Baloević ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 1662-1665 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Cohen-Mouly ◽  
Alain Badia ◽  
Anne-Sophie Bats ◽  
Françoise Barthes ◽  
Chérazade Bensaïd ◽  
...  

Objectives:To evaluate the feasibility of video-assisted thoracoscopy (VAT) for staging advanced ovarian cancer, to measure the performance of preoperative computed tomography (CT) for diagnosing pleural metastases, to assess the correlation between pleural and abdominal involvement, and to measure the impact of VAT on patient management.Methods:We retrospectively evaluated 16 VAT procedures in 15 patients with advanced ovarian malignancies and pleural effusions. The reason for VAT was either to evaluate unilateral or bilateral pleural effusions (n = 15) or to evaluate pleural metastases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 1). Preoperative CT was performed routinely, and findings were compared with those of VAT. The rates of involvement of the hepatic pedicle, mesentery, and right side of the diaphragm were compared with the rate of pleural involvement.Results:The right side of the chest was examined 12 times; and the left side, 4 times. There were no complications; 1 procedure was stopped because of ventilatory intolerance. Video-assisted thoracoscopy identified metastases smaller than 1 cm in 5 patients and larger than 1 cm in 2 additional patients; there was no evidence of pleural involvement in 6 patients. Computed tomography had 14% sensitivity and 25% specificity for pleural status determination, using VAT biopsy as the reference standard. Pleural involvement did not correlate with involvement of the hepatic pedicle, mesentery, or right side of the diaphragm.Conclusions:Video-assisted thoracoscopy performs better than CT for evaluating pleural involvement in ovarian cancer. Video-assisted thoracoscopy supplies accurate data on thoracic involvement, which does not seem predictable from the peritoneal involvement. Video-assisted thoracoscopy may impact patient management.


Onkologie ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 8-8
Author(s):  
Kyung-Do Ki ◽  
Jong-Min Lee ◽  
Seo-Yun Tong ◽  
Seon-Kyung Lee ◽  
Dae-Hyun Kim ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document