Visual Improvement After Optic Nerve Sheath Decompression in a Case of Congenital Hydrocephalus and Persistent Visual Loss Despite Intracranial Pressure Correction Via Shunting

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 297-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryant P. Carruth ◽  
Thomas A. Bersani ◽  
P. Emmet Hurley ◽  
Melissa W. Ko
Author(s):  
Thomas N. Hwang ◽  
Timothy J. McCulley

Optic nerve sheath decompression (ONSD) or fenestration refers to a surgical technique that creates a window through the dural and arachnoid meningeal layers of the retrobulbar optic nerve sheath to release pressure on the optic nerve. ONSD for treatment of visual loss secondary to refractory papilledema was first described by DeWecker in 1872. Later that century, Carter and Müller published the second case series of optic nerve sheath fenestrations. However, despite these and several additional reports, the clinical benefit of performing this procedure was still questioned. In addition, alternative cerebrospinal shunting procedures were developed for patients with increased intracranial pressure. Renewed interest arose in 1964 when Hayreh demonstrated the effectiveness of ONSD in relieving experimental papilledema in rhesus monkeys. Various supporting clinical publications have since followed, starting with Smith, Hoyt, and Newton’s description in 1969 of relief of chronic papilledema by ONSD. Surgical intervention is considered for patients with progressive visual loss secondary to elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) in whom conservative management, such as medications (acetazolamide and furosemide) and weight control, has failed. Occasionally surgery is used primarily in patients whose visual function has already reached a critical level. Examples include patients in whom vision has declined to a disabling level in hopes that rapid papilledema resolution will result in some visual return. Surgery is also considered primarily in those with little remaining vision, in whom any further visual loss would carry substantial functional impact should conservative management fail. Once surgical intervention is deemed necessary, ONSD is one of several options. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunting in the form of ventricular–peritoneal (VP) or lumbar–peritoneal (LP) shunting can be considered. A deciding factor for some is the presence of headache, which is more effectively managed with VP or LP shunting. Comparative trials of ONSD and other CSF shunting procedures are lacking. Consequently, some medical centers opt for ONSD as the first-line surgical option, while others recommend alternative shunting procedures. At present, the only uniformly accepted therapeutic indication for ONSD is management of visual loss related to elevated ICP. The most common setting for ONSD is idiopathic intracranial hypertension.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 244-251
Author(s):  
Aynur Guliyeva ◽  
Melda Apaydin ◽  
Yesim Beckmann ◽  
Gulten Sezgin ◽  
Fazil Gelal

Background Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a disease characterised by increased cerebral pressure without a mass or hydrocephalus. We aimed to differentiate migraine and IIH patients based on imaging findings. Results Patients with IIH ( n = 32), migraine patients ( n = 34) and control subjects ( n = 33) were evaluated. Routine magnetic resonance imaging, contrast-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance venography and/or T1-weighted 3D gradient-recalled echo were taken with a 1.5 T magnetic resonance scanner. Optic-nerve sheath distention, flattened posterior globe and the height of the pituitary gland were evaluated in the three groups. Transverse sinuses (TS) were evaluated with respect to score of attenuation/stenosis and distribution. Pearson chi-square, Fisher’s exact test and chi-square trend statistical analyses were used for comparisons between the groups. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Decreased pituitary gland height, optic-nerve sheath distention and flattened posterior globe were found to be statistically significant ( p < 0.001) in IIH patients. Bilateral TS stenosis was also more common in IIH patients than in the control group and migraine group ( p = 0.02). Conclusion Decreased pituitary gland height, optic-nerve sheath distention, flattened posterior globe, bilateral stenosis and discontinuity in TS are significant findings in differentiating IIH cases from healthy individuals and migraine patients. Bilateral TS stenosis may be the cause rather than the result of increased intracranial pressure. The increase in intracranial pressure, which is considered to be responsible for the pathophysiology of IIH, is not involved in the pathophysiology of migraine.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document